Talk:File Sharing Utility - Revision history

Kashes911 at 08:46, 3 April 2009

2009-04-03T08:46:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:46, 3 April 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Looks pretty good overall. One small question: do you intend to try to integrate glade-based interfaces with existing journal interfaces (non-glade-based)? [[User:Homunq\|Homunq]] 02:51, 24 March 2009 (UTC)		Looks pretty good overall. One small question: do you intend to try to integrate glade-based interfaces with existing journal interfaces (non-glade-based)? [[User:Homunq\|Homunq]] 02:51, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

	Reply : Thanks Homunq for reviewing it. On thorough research I found out that making glade work on Sugar will be a big project in it self. Therefore sue to fixed schedule of the Gsoc I wont be doing that. I definitely will like to work on such a project though after Gsoc as it will greatly improve development experience on Sugar. PyGTK for now !		'''Reply''' : Thanks Homunq for reviewing it. On thorough research I found out that making glade work on Sugar will be a big project in it self. Therefore sue to fixed schedule of the Gsoc I wont be doing that. I definitely will like to work on such a project though after Gsoc as it will greatly improve development experience on Sugar. PyGTK for now !


	Why not try to us Telepathy for the sharing? [[User:BryanWB\|BryanWB]] 11:03, 24 March 2009 (UTC)		Why not try to us Telepathy for the sharing? [[User:BryanWB\|BryanWB]] 11:03, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

	Reply : Thanks BryanWB for spending time to review my application. Telepathy will indeed be used for many purposes. I will be detailing on it in the proposal shortly.		'''Reply''' : Thanks BryanWB for spending time to review my application. Telepathy will indeed be used for many purposes. I will be detailing on it in the proposal shortly.


Line 15:		Line 15:

	You're more than half way there, but you need to flesh this out a little bit. [[User:Homunq\|Homunq]] 00:11, 31 March 2009 (UTC)		You're more than half way there, but you need to flesh this out a little bit. [[User:Homunq\|Homunq]] 00:11, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

			'''Reply''' : I have added detailed time line, answered few of the remaining questions and also included a link to the draft (work in progress) of the first step of my project. Hope you find this sufficient.

Homunq: /* good, but needs detail */ new section

2009-03-31T00:11:21Z

good, but needs detail: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:11, 30 March 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:

	I will appreciate any kind of queries/recommendation on my application.		I will appreciate any kind of queries/recommendation on my application.

			== good, but needs detail ==

			You're more than half way there, but you need to flesh this out a little bit. [[User:Homunq\|Homunq]] 00:11, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Kashes911 at 01:07, 26 March 2009

2009-03-26T01:07:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:07, 25 March 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Looks pretty good overall. One small question: do you intend to try to integrate glade-based interfaces with existing journal interfaces (non-glade-based)? [[User:Homunq\|Homunq]] 02:51, 24 March 2009 (UTC)		Looks pretty good overall. One small question: do you intend to try to integrate glade-based interfaces with existing journal interfaces (non-glade-based)? [[User:Homunq\|Homunq]] 02:51, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

	Reply : Thanks ~~Homonuq~~ for reviewing it. On thorough research I found out that making glade work on Sugar will be a big project in it self. Therefore sue to fixed schedule of the Gsoc I wont be doing that. I definitely will like to work on such a project though after Gsoc as it will greatly improve development experience on Sugar. PyGTK for now !		Reply : Thanks Homunq for reviewing it. On thorough research I found out that making glade work on Sugar will be a big project in it self. Therefore sue to fixed schedule of the Gsoc I wont be doing that. I definitely will like to work on such a project though after Gsoc as it will greatly improve development experience on Sugar. PyGTK for now !

Kashes911 at 01:06, 26 March 2009

2009-03-26T01:06:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:06, 25 March 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:


	I will ~~invite~~ any kind of queries/recommendation on my application.		I will appreciate any kind of queries/recommendation on my application.

Kashes911 at 06:48, 25 March 2009

2009-03-25T06:48:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:48, 25 March 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Looks pretty good overall. One small question: do you intend to try to integrate glade-based interfaces with existing journal interfaces (non-glade-based)? [[User:Homunq\|Homunq]] 02:51, 24 March 2009 (UTC)		Looks pretty good overall. One small question: do you intend to try to integrate glade-based interfaces with existing journal interfaces (non-glade-based)? [[User:Homunq\|Homunq]] 02:51, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

			Reply : Thanks Homonuq for reviewing it. On thorough research I found out that making glade work on Sugar will be a big project in it self. Therefore sue to fixed schedule of the Gsoc I wont be doing that. I definitely will like to work on such a project though after Gsoc as it will greatly improve development experience on Sugar. PyGTK for now !


	Why not try to us Telepathy for the sharing? [[User:BryanWB\|BryanWB]] 11:03, 24 March 2009 (UTC)		Why not try to us Telepathy for the sharing? [[User:BryanWB\|BryanWB]] 11:03, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

			Reply : Thanks BryanWB for spending time to review my application. Telepathy will indeed be used for many purposes. I will be detailing on it in the proposal shortly.



			I will invite any kind of queries/recommendation on my application.

BryanWB at 11:03, 24 March 2009

2009-03-24T11:03:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:03, 24 March 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Looks pretty good overall. One small question: do you intend to try to integrate glade-based interfaces with existing journal interfaces (non-glade-based)? [[User:Homunq\|Homunq]] 02:51, 24 March 2009 (UTC)		Looks pretty good overall. One small question: do you intend to try to integrate glade-based interfaces with existing journal interfaces (non-glade-based)? [[User:Homunq\|Homunq]] 02:51, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

			Why not try to us Telepathy for the sharing? [[User:BryanWB\|BryanWB]] 11:03, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Homunq: New page: Looks pretty good overall. One small question: do you intend to try to integrate glade-based interfaces with existing journal interfaces (non-glade-based)? ~~~~

2009-03-24T02:51:29Z

New page: Looks pretty good overall. One small question: do you intend to try to integrate glade-based interfaces with existing journal interfaces (non-glade-based)? ~~~~

New page

Looks pretty good overall. One small question: do you intend to try to integrate glade-based interfaces with existing journal interfaces (non-glade-based)? [[User:Homunq|Homunq]] 02:51, 24 March 2009 (UTC)