Difference between revisions of "Talk:Infrastructure Team/Migrating to GitHub"

From Sugar Labs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
A lot of the repos listed at the bottom of the page are clearly not the canonical repositories of these activities.  We should probably delete them from the list (or at least flag them as non-canonical.  ----
+
A lot of the repos listed at the bottom of the page are clearly not the canonical repositories of these activities.  We should probably delete them from the list (or at least flag them as non-canonical.  [[User:Cjl|Cjl]] ([[User talk:Cjl|talk]]) 15:44, 17 May 2016 (EDT)
 +
: Exactly, but they are on github, so they should be transferred, or removed and forked from the upstream repo [[User:Davelab6|Davelab6]] ([[User talk:Davelab6|talk]]) 17:10, 17 May 2016 (EDT)
 +
: I have run through all the duplicate repos I found in the list, and I explained my process plan in the main article text :) [[User:Davelab6|Davelab6]] ([[User talk:Davelab6|talk]]) 18:12, 17 May 2016 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 18:12, 17 May 2016

A lot of the repos listed at the bottom of the page are clearly not the canonical repositories of these activities. We should probably delete them from the list (or at least flag them as non-canonical. Cjl (talk) 15:44, 17 May 2016 (EDT)

Exactly, but they are on github, so they should be transferred, or removed and forked from the upstream repo Davelab6 (talk) 17:10, 17 May 2016 (EDT)
I have run through all the duplicate repos I found in the list, and I explained my process plan in the main article text :) Davelab6 (talk) 18:12, 17 May 2016 (EDT)