Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sugar Labs"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | This page seems outdated now that we have the Community sidebar. Its at the top of the Community page, let's refresh it. --[[User:FGrose|FGrose]] 03:00, 15 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
"'''explore, express, debug, critique'''" is a great set of four goals. | "'''explore, express, debug, critique'''" is a great set of four goals. | ||
Revision as of 23:00, 14 March 2009
This page seems outdated now that we have the Community sidebar. Its at the top of the Community page, let's refresh it. --FGrose 03:00, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
"explore, express, debug, critique" is a great set of four goals.
The four goals currently listed on this page are different -- indeed, they have almost no overlap. They are improving the simplicity of
- sharing activities
- installing activities
- writing new activities,
- being secure while using activities
This is compatible with a constellation of lightly-connected developers creating appliance-style activities, each a microcosm of its own, and passing them on to users who are expected to share them as is (or send patches to their owners).
It doesn't explicitly aim to support exploring (through active, permeating view-and-modify-source interfaces suitable for all learners), debugging (ditto, along with active debugger, logging, and visualization interfaces suitable for all learners), or critiquing (through any sort of shareable annotation or commentary).
I hope this is a matter of "what comes first, and what comes second" and not a shift in goals for Sugar as a meme and environment. +sj + 22:57, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
fedora-olpc
I propose adding the fedora-olpc weekly meeting to the SL calendar as it touches some sugar-related issues. It's every thursday at 18.00 UTC. Tomeu 17:44, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
- +1 --Walter 17:50, 11 December 2008 (UTC)