Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sugar Labs"

From Sugar Labs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 23: Line 23:
  
 
:+1 --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 17:50, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 
:+1 --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 17:50, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 +
 +
== broken links ==
 +
 +
The recent change from referencing the calendar images directly to using wiki words breaks the use of those images as links. Was that intentional? --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 11:37, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:37, 8 April 2009

Page refresh

This page seems outdated now that we have the Community sidebar. Its at the top of the Community group, let's refresh it. --FGrose 03:00, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes. This page is very much out of date. --Walter 03:04, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

explore, express, debug, critique

is a great set of four goals.

The four goals currently listed on this page are different -- indeed, they have almost no overlap. They are improving the simplicity of

sharing activities
installing activities
writing new activities,
being secure while using activities

This is compatible with a constellation of lightly-connected developers creating appliance-style activities, each a microcosm of its own, and passing them on to users who are expected to share them as is (or send patches to their owners).

It doesn't explicitly aim to support exploring (through active, permeating view-and-modify-source interfaces suitable for all learners), debugging (ditto, along with active debugger, logging, and visualization interfaces suitable for all learners), or critiquing (through any sort of shareable annotation or commentary).

I hope this is a matter of "what comes first, and what comes second" and not a shift in goals for Sugar as a meme and environment. +sj + 22:57, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

fedora-olpc

I propose adding the fedora-olpc weekly meeting to the SL calendar as it touches some sugar-related issues. It's every thursday at 18.00 UTC. Tomeu 17:44, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

+1 --Walter 17:50, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

broken links

The recent change from referencing the calendar images directly to using wiki words breaks the use of those images as links. Was that intentional? --Walter 11:37, 8 April 2009 (UTC)