Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sugar Labs/Members/List"
< Talk:Sugar Labs | Members
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Talk:Sugar Labs/initial members list moved to Talk:Sugar Labs/Initial Members List: fix title) |
m (fix camelcase links) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | A drafty description of "who are members" would be helpful - nothing so formal as a set of criteria, just a basic discussion; and a sense of "if you are like this, you may [ask to/want to] be a member of | + | A drafty description of "who are members" would be helpful - nothing so formal as a set of criteria, just a basic discussion; and a sense of "if you are like this, you may [ask to/want to] be a member of Sugar Labs". [[User:Sj|+sj]] [[User Talk:Sj|<font color="#ff6996">+</font>]] 23:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC) |
:From my email: "The criteria I used was in regard to activity on the Sugar and Education mailing lists, contribution to the codebase and to the wiki (and other forms of documentation). I hope to broaden the reach of Sugar Labs membership to include more educators--they are underrepresented." --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 02:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC) | :From my email: "The criteria I used was in regard to activity on the Sugar and Education mailing lists, contribution to the codebase and to the wiki (and other forms of documentation). I hope to broaden the reach of Sugar Labs membership to include more educators--they are underrepresented." --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 02:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:51, 8 April 2009
A drafty description of "who are members" would be helpful - nothing so formal as a set of criteria, just a basic discussion; and a sense of "if you are like this, you may [ask to/want to] be a member of Sugar Labs". +sj + 23:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
- From my email: "The criteria I used was in regard to activity on the Sugar and Education mailing lists, contribution to the codebase and to the wiki (and other forms of documentation). I hope to broaden the reach of Sugar Labs membership to include more educators--they are underrepresented." --Walter 02:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)