https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=Tabitha 2026-04-11T23:22:54Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.43.0 https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Activity_Library/Editors/Policy&diff=61940 2011-02-19T00:29:29Z

<p>Tabitha: /* Guidelines for accepting an activity */</p> <hr /> <div>{{draft}}<br /> <br /> == Technical policy ==<br /> <br /> All technical checks will happen [[Platform_Team/Recipe_Lint|automatically]] while uploading activities.<br /> <br /> == Non-technical policy ==<br /> {{:{{PAGENAME}}/Non-Technical}}<br /> <br /> == Guidelines for accepting an activity ==<br /> <br /> * Must Start/Stop cleanly<br /> ** When stopping must stop gracefully - not stay in memory.<br /> * CPU and Memory usage<br /> ** Usage must be proportional to functionality<br /> ** Must not completely tie up the machine<br /> * Interface<br /> ** Conform to Sugar standards?<br /> ** Icons to meet sugar colour guidelines<br /> ** Frame key must work from within the activity<br /> ** Must fit within screen size of the XO’s<br /> * Journal<br /> ** Is there save functionality and does it interact with the Journal well?<br /> ** Are file types registered with SugarOS correctly?<br /> * Checks<br /> ** Black and white (high contrast screen)<br /> ** Sound<br /> ***Does sound behave?<br /> ****Stutter<br /> ****lock up sound card<br /> ** Collaboration<br /> ***Must work if button is there<br /> ***Maximum number of collaborators<br /> ***Test with 3 or more?<br /> * Bugs (for updated activities)<br /> ** Are there any regressions in old functionality?<br /> ** How functional is new functionality?<br /> * Download size of application must be reasonable compared to<br /> ** similar applications<br /> ** functionality<br /> * For activities webpage<br /> ** Must have reasonable explanation of purpose for the “more about this activity” field<br /> ** Must have release notes<br /> ** Must be categorised correctly<br /> * Versions of Sugar<br /> ** Do we assume the developer has tested on all versions they say it works on?<br /> ** Tester approving activity tests on olpc stable builds?<br /> ** Who tests on SoaS and what version?<br /> * Must tell user if the activity is using web? collecting user data?<br /> <br /> == Resources ==<br /> <br /> * Original AMO [http://activities.sugarlabs.org/pages/policy policy]<br /> <br /> [[Category:Activity Library]]</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Activity_Library/Editors/Policy&diff=61939 2011-02-19T00:27:02Z

<p>Tabitha: /* Guidelines for accepting an activity */</p> <hr /> <div>{{draft}}<br /> <br /> == Technical policy ==<br /> <br /> All technical checks will happen [[Platform_Team/Recipe_Lint|automatically]] while uploading activities.<br /> <br /> == Non-technical policy ==<br /> {{:{{PAGENAME}}/Non-Technical}}<br /> <br /> == Guidelines for accepting an activity ==<br /> <br /> * Must Start/Stop cleanly<br /> ** When stopping must stop gracefully - not stay in memory.<br /> * CPU and Memory usage<br /> ** Usage must be proportional to functionality<br /> ** Must not completely tie up the machine<br /> * Interface<br /> ** Conform to Sugar standards?<br /> ** Icons to meet sugar colour guidelines<br /> ** Frame key must work from within the activity<br /> ** Must fit within screen size of the XO’s<br /> * Journal<br /> ** Is there save functionality and does it interact with the Journal well?<br /> ** Are file types registered with SugarOS correctly?<br /> * Checks<br /> ** Black and white (high contrast screen)<br /> ** Sound<br /> + Does sound behave?<br /> # Stutter<br /> # lock up sound card<br /> ** Collaboration<br /> + Must work if button is there<br /> + Maximum number of collaborators<br /> + Test with 3 or more?<br /> * Bugs (for updated activities)<br /> ** Are there any regressions in old functionality?<br /> ** How functional is new functionality?<br /> * Download size of application must be reasonable compared to<br /> ** similar applications<br /> ** functionality<br /> * For activities webpage<br /> ** Must have reasonable explanation of purpose for the “more about this activity” field<br /> ** Must have release notes<br /> ** Must be categorised correctly<br /> * Versions of Sugar<br /> ** Do we assume the developer has tested on all versions they say it works on?<br /> ** Tester approving activity tests on olpc stable builds?<br /> ** Who tests on SoaS and what version?<br /> * Must tell user if the activity is using web? collecting user data?<br /> <br /> == Resources ==<br /> <br /> * Original AMO [http://activities.sugarlabs.org/pages/policy policy]<br /> <br /> [[Category:Activity Library]]</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Activity_Library/Editors/Policy&diff=61938 2011-02-19T00:25:24Z

<p>Tabitha: /* Guidelines for accepting an activity */</p> <hr /> <div>{{draft}}<br /> <br /> == Technical policy ==<br /> <br /> All technical checks will happen [[Platform_Team/Recipe_Lint|automatically]] while uploading activities.<br /> <br /> == Non-technical policy ==<br /> {{:{{PAGENAME}}/Non-Technical}}<br /> <br /> == Guidelines for accepting an activity ==<br /> <br /> * Must Start/Stop cleanly<br /> oo When stopping must stop gracefully - not stay in memory.<br /> * CPU and Memory usage<br /> oo Usage must be proportional to functionality<br /> oo Must not completely tie up the machine<br /> * Interface<br /> oo Conform to Sugar standards?<br /> oo Icons to meet sugar colour guidelines<br /> oo Frame key must work from within the activity<br /> oo Must fit within screen size of the XO’s<br /> * Journal<br /> oo Is there save functionality and does it interact with the Journal well?<br /> oo Are file types registered with SugarOS correctly?<br /> * Checks<br /> oo Black and white (high contrast screen)<br /> oo Sound<br /> + Does sound behave?<br /> # Stutter<br /> # lock up sound card<br /> oo Collaboration<br /> + Must work if button is there<br /> + Maximum number of collaborators<br /> + Test with 3 or more?<br /> * Bugs (for updated activities)<br /> oo Are there any regressions in old functionality?<br /> oo How functional is new functionality?<br /> * Download size of application must be reasonable compared to<br /> oo similar applications<br /> oo functionality<br /> * For activities webpage<br /> oo Must have reasonable explanation of purpose for the “more about this activity” field<br /> oo Must have release notes<br /> oo Must be categorised correctly<br /> * Versions of Sugar<br /> oo Do we assume the developer has tested on all versions they say it works on?<br /> oo Tester approving activity tests on olpc stable builds?<br /> oo Who tests on SoaS and what version?<br /> * Must tell user if the activity is using web? collecting user data?<br /> <br /> == Resources ==<br /> <br /> * Original AMO [http://activities.sugarlabs.org/pages/policy policy]<br /> <br /> [[Category:Activity Library]]</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Activity_Library/Editors/Policy&diff=61937 2011-02-19T00:24:07Z

<p>Tabitha: /* Guidelines for accepting an activity */</p> <hr /> <div>{{draft}}<br /> <br /> == Technical policy ==<br /> <br /> All technical checks will happen [[Platform_Team/Recipe_Lint|automatically]] while uploading activities.<br /> <br /> == Non-technical policy ==<br /> {{:{{PAGENAME}}/Non-Technical}}<br /> <br /> == Guidelines for accepting an activity ==<br /> <br /> * Must Start/Stop cleanly<br /> o When stopping must stop gracefully - not stay in memory.<br /> * CPU and Memory usage<br /> o Usage must be proportional to functionality<br /> o Must not completely tie up the machine<br /> * Interface<br /> o Conform to Sugar standards?<br /> o Icons to meet sugar colour guidelines<br /> o Frame key must work from within the activity<br /> o Must fit within screen size of the XO’s<br /> * Journal<br /> o Is there save functionality and does it interact with the Journal well?<br /> o Are file types registered with SugarOS correctly?<br /> * Checks<br /> o Black and white (high contrast screen)<br /> o Sound<br /> + Does sound behave?<br /> # Stutter<br /> # lock up sound card<br /> o Collaboration<br /> + Must work if button is there<br /> + Maximum number of collaborators<br /> + Test with 3 or more?<br /> * Bugs (for updated activities)<br /> o Are there any regressions in old functionality?<br /> o How functional is new functionality?<br /> * Download size of application must be reasonable compared to<br /> o similar applications<br /> o functionality<br /> * For activities webpage<br /> o Must have reasonable explanation of purpose for the “more about this activity” field<br /> o Must have release notes<br /> o Must be categorised correctly<br /> * Versions of Sugar<br /> o Do we assume the developer has tested on all versions they say it works on?<br /> o Tester approving activity tests on olpc stable builds?<br /> o Who tests on SoaS and what version?<br /> * Must tell user if the activity is using web? collecting user data?<br /> <br /> == Resources ==<br /> <br /> * Original AMO [http://activities.sugarlabs.org/pages/policy policy]<br /> <br /> [[Category:Activity Library]]</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Activity_Library/Editors/Policy&diff=61936 2011-02-19T00:22:25Z

<p>Tabitha: /* Guidelines for accepting an activity */</p> <hr /> <div>{{draft}}<br /> <br /> == Technical policy ==<br /> <br /> All technical checks will happen [[Platform_Team/Recipe_Lint|automatically]] while uploading activities.<br /> <br /> == Non-technical policy ==<br /> {{:{{PAGENAME}}/Non-Technical}}<br /> <br /> == Guidelines for accepting an activity ==<br /> <br /> * Must Start/Stop cleanly<br /> o When stopping must stop gracefully - not stay in memory.<br /> * CPU and Memory usage<br /> o Usage must be proportional to functionality<br /> o Must not completely tie up the machine<br /> * Interface<br /> o Conform to Sugar standards?<br /> o Icons to meet sugar colour guidelines<br /> o Frame key must work from within the activity<br /> o Must fit within screen size of the XO’s<br /> * Journal<br /> o Is there save functionality and does it interact with the Journal well?<br /> o Are file types registered with SugarOS correctly?<br /> * Checks<br /> o Black and white (high contrast screen)<br /> o Sound<br /> + Does sound behave?<br /> # Stutter<br /> # lock up sound card<br /> o Collaboration<br /> + Must work if button is there<br /> + Maximum number of collaborators<br /> + Test with 3 or more?<br /> * Bugs (for updated activities)<br /> o Are there any regressions in old functionality?<br /> o How functional is new functionality?<br /> * Download size of application must be reasonable compared to<br /> o similar applications<br /> o functionality<br /> * For activities webpage<br /> o Must have reasonable explanation of purpose for the “more about this activity” field<br /> o Must have release notes<br /> o Must be categorised correctly<br /> * Versions of Sugar<br /> o Do we assume the developer has tested on all versions they say it works on?<br /> o Tester approving activity tests on olpc stable builds?<br /> o Who tests on SoaS and what version?<br /> * Must tell user if the activity is using web? collecting user data?<br /> <br /> == Resources ==<br /> <br /> * Original AMO [http://activities.sugarlabs.org/pages/policy policy]<br /> <br /> [[Category:Activity Library]]</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Activity_Library/Editors/Policy&diff=61934 2011-02-19T00:21:24Z

<p>Tabitha: </p> <hr /> <div>{{draft}}<br /> <br /> == Technical policy ==<br /> <br /> All technical checks will happen [[Platform_Team/Recipe_Lint|automatically]] while uploading activities.<br /> <br /> == Non-technical policy ==<br /> {{:{{PAGENAME}}/Non-Technical}}<br /> <br /> == Guidelines for accepting an activity ==<br /> <br /> * Must Start/Stop cleanly<br /> o When stopping must stop gracefully - not stay in memory.<br /> * CPU and Memory usage<br /> o Usage must be proportional to functionality<br /> o Must not completely tie up the machine<br /> * Interface<br /> o Conform to Sugar standards?<br /> o Icons to meet sugar colour guidelines<br /> o Frame key must work from within the activity<br /> o Must fit within screen size of the XO’s<br /> * Journal<br /> o Is there save functionality and does it interact with the Journal well?<br /> o Are file types registered with SugarOS correctly?<br /> * Checks<br /> o Black and white (high contrast screen)<br /> o Sound<br /> + Does sound behave?<br /> # Stutter<br /> # lock up sound card<br /> o Collaboration<br /> + Must work if button is there<br /> + Maximum number of collaborators<br /> + Test with 3 or more?<br /> * Bugs (for updated activities)<br /> o Are there any regressions in old functionality?<br /> o How functional is new functionality?<br /> * Download size of application must be reasonable compared to<br /> o similar applications<br /> o functionality<br /> * For activities webpage<br /> o Must have reasonable explanation of purpose for the “more about this activity” field<br /> o Must have release notes<br /> o Must be categorised correctly<br /> * Versions of Sugar<br /> o Do we assume the developer has tested on all versions they say it works on?<br /> o Tester approving activity tests on olpc stable builds?<br /> o Who tests on SoaS and what version?<br /> * Must tell user if the activity is using web? collecting user data? <br /> <br /> == Resources ==<br /> <br /> * Original AMO [http://activities.sugarlabs.org/pages/policy policy]<br /> <br /> [[Category:Activity Library]]</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Activity_Library/Editors/Policy/Non-Technical&diff=61933 2011-02-19T00:19:42Z

<p>Tabitha: /* Who can be an editor ? */</p> <hr /> <div>=== Who can be an editor ? ===<br /> Any sugar learner should and can be an editor of the Activity Library, <br /> we only advise that the editor can't be the same developer of the activity, this is truth for not-trusted activities. (see definitions bellow) <br /> <br /> * ''Trusted Activities'' <br /> These are activities that don't need an editor approval for publicize new updated versions. <br /> <br /> * ''Not-trusted Activities'' <br /> These are activities that need an editor approval in order to publicize new updated versions of the activities<br /> <br /> Maintained activities are entitled to be trusted, and all activities that fulfill technical and non-technical policies can be trusted.<br /> <br /> == Removing, reviewing, sandboxing activities ==<br /> <br /> Some points that should be considered during activity review, some activities may be entirely removed.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> === Reasons for removing ===<br /> <br /> * inappropriate (violent, sexual, subversive) content<br /> * inappropriate license, see Oversight Board [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-12-11#Non-FOSS_content|meeting notes]] for details.<br /> <br /> === Reasons for keeping or moving to the Sandbox ===<br /> <br /> Activities that are experimental are kept in Activity's Library sandbox (i.e., only registered users can download them).<br /> <br /> * '''Any confusion with already-published activities'''&lt;br&gt;<br /> <br /> '''A''': Make the difference more clear, by obvious renaming, providing notice in the description, or not launching activity, etc. <br /> <br /> * '''Buggy activities'''&lt;br&gt;<br /> If the activity is proving to not start or is having serious functionality problems, it should be moved to the sandbox or removed.<br /> <br /> '''A''': Contact the maintainer or Developer to notify them of the issue.<br /> <br /> ** At the same time we should stimulate experiments, changing existing activities and, very importantly, sharing results of these experiments. A new ASLO code base might support having several implementations (&quot;forks&quot; might be too hard a word for them) of the same activity. Need to think how this can be achieved.&lt;br&gt;[[User:Alsroot|alsroot]] 07:32, 25 October 2010 (EDT)<br /> <br /> * '''Obvious misuse of categories, e.g., FireFox activity in Teaching tools'''&lt;br&gt;<br /> '''A''': Contact the uploader to clarify the category choice.</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Global_education_conference&diff=59386 2010-11-17T04:18:02Z

<p>Tabitha: /* Global Education Conference 15-19 November 2010 */</p> <hr /> <div>== Global Education Conference 15-19 November 2010 ==<br /> <br /> <br /> The 2010 Global Education Conference will be held November 15 - 19, 2010, online and free - I am wondering how much Sugar community support I could get if I proposed a Sugar session, It would mean that before the session attendees would need to download Sugar on a Stick, I think it would be good if we had community involved and able to help with running it in more than just English and helping people, anyone want to be involved?<br /> <br /> I am thinking of proposing an open discussion, where people who have tried downloading Sugar on a Stick and using it give us feedback on their experience and can ask questions of the Sugar community. If people are having installation problems we divert them to IRC channel (maybe #sugar-newbies) for instant support, and keep the elluminate session focused on education benefits, suggestions, etc.<br /> <br /> So far we have English and Hindi listed, thanks Manu for offering support for this session and bringing your experience with grade 6 and 7 in New Delhi Sugar on a Stick deployment.<br /> <br /> <br /> ELLUMINATE SESSION ROOM (open one hour before session): https://sas.elluminate.com/d.jnlp?sid=gec2010&amp;password=D.ADFE930D6A553757A0A2BC4C7412C9 <br /> <br /> TIME: <br /> * Auckland, NZ - 20:00 Thursday 18 September<br /> * Boston, US - 02:00 Thursday 18 September<br /> * London, UK - 07:00 Thursday 18 September<br /> * New Delhi, India - 12:30 Thursday 18 September<br /> <br /> FORMAT: Open Discussion <br /> <br /> LANGUAGE: English <br /> <br /> SHORT DESCRIPTION: The award-winning Sugar Learning Platform promotes collaborative learning through Sugar Activities that encourage critical thinking, the heart of a quality education. Designed from the ground up especially for children, Sugar offers an alternative to traditional “office-desktop” software. This open discussion is an opportunity to ask questions about Sugar and how it is used, give feedback and make suggestions, and discuss the educational benefits in using Sugar as an educational tool in schools. During this session, volunteers in the Sugar community will be available to participate in the discussion and answer questions. Participants need to download Sugar on a Stick in advance and try it out in preparation for this open discussion.</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Global_education_conference&diff=59385 2010-11-17T04:17:04Z

<p>Tabitha: /* Global Education Conference 15-19 November 2010 */</p> <hr /> <div>== Global Education Conference 15-19 November 2010 ==<br /> <br /> <br /> The 2010 Global Education Conference will be held November 15 - 19, 2010, online and free - I am wondering how much Sugar community support I could get if I proposed a Sugar session, It would mean that before the session attendees would need to download Sugar on a Stick, I think it would be good if we had community involved and able to help with running it in more than just English and helping people, anyone want to be involved?<br /> <br /> I am thinking of proposing an open discussion, where people who have tried downloading Sugar on a Stick and using it give us feedback on their experience and can ask questions of the Sugar community. If people are having installation problems we divert them to IRC channel (maybe #sugar-newbies) for instant support, and keep the elluminate session focused on education benefits, suggestions, etc.<br /> <br /> So far we have English and Hindi listed, thanks Manu for offering support for this session and bringing your experience with grade 6 and 7 in New Delhi Sugar on a Stick deployment.<br /> <br /> <br /> ELLUMINATE SESSION ROOM (open one hour before session): https://sas.elluminate.com/d.jnlp?sid=gec2010&amp;password=D.ADFE930D6A553757A0A2BC4C7412C9 <br /> <br /> TIME: <br /> Auckland, NZ - 20:00 Thursday 18 September<br /> Boston, US - 02:00 Thursday 18 September<br /> London, UK - 07:00 Thursday 18 September<br /> New Delhi, India - 12:30 Thursday 18 September<br /> <br /> FORMAT: Open Discussion <br /> <br /> LANGUAGE: English <br /> <br /> SHORT DESCRIPTION: The award-winning Sugar Learning Platform promotes collaborative learning through Sugar Activities that encourage critical thinking, the heart of a quality education. Designed from the ground up especially for children, Sugar offers an alternative to traditional “office-desktop” software. This open discussion is an opportunity to ask questions about Sugar and how it is used, give feedback and make suggestions, and discuss the educational benefits in using Sugar as an educational tool in schools. During this session, volunteers in the Sugar community will be available to participate in the discussion and answer questions. Participants need to download Sugar on a Stick in advance and try it out in preparation for this open discussion.</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Global_education_conference&diff=59384 2010-11-17T04:13:08Z

<p>Tabitha: </p> <hr /> <div>== Global Education Conference 15-19 November 2010 ==<br /> <br /> <br /> The 2010 Global Education Conference will be held November 15 - 19, 2010, online and free - I am wondering how much Sugar community support I could get if I proposed a Sugar session, It would mean that before the session attendees would need to download Sugar on a Stick, I think it would be good if we had community involved and able to help with running it in more than just English and helping people, anyone want to be involved?<br /> <br /> I am thinking of proposing an open discussion, where people who have tried downloading Sugar on a Stick and using it give us feedback on their experience and can ask questions of the Sugar community. If people are having installation problems we divert them to IRC channel (maybe #sugar-newbies) for instant support, and keep the elluminate session focused on education benefits, suggestions, etc.<br /> <br /> So far we have English and Hindi listed, thanks Manu for offering support for this session and bringing your experience with grade 6 and 7 in New Delhi Sugar on a Stick deployment.<br /> <br /> <br /> ELLUMINATE SESSION ROOM (open one hour before session): https://sas.elluminate.com/d.jnlp?sid=gec2010&amp;password=D.ADFE930D6A553757A0A2BC4C7412C9 <br /> <br /> FORMAT: Open Discussion <br /> <br /> LANGUAGE: English <br /> <br /> SHORT DESCRIPTION: The award-winning Sugar Learning Platform promotes collaborative learning through Sugar Activities that encourage critical thinking, the heart of a quality education. Designed from the ground up especially for children, Sugar offers an alternative to traditional “office-desktop” software. This open discussion is an opportunity to ask questions about Sugar and how it is used, give feedback and make suggestions, and discuss the educational benefits in using Sugar as an educational tool in schools. During this session, volunteers in the Sugar community will be available to participate in the discussion and answer questions. Participants need to download Sugar on a Stick in advance and try it out in preparation for this open discussion.</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Emulator_image_files&diff=57783 2010-10-01T23:28:09Z

<p>Tabitha: added usr virtualbox guest additions instructions</p> <hr /> <div>&lt;noinclude&gt;[[Category:Virtual machine or platform emulator]]&lt;/noinclude&gt;<br /> <br /> This is a quick guide to the locations of various forms of Sugar and the XS school server software that can run in QEMU emulation or VMware or VirtualBox virtualization. You can download installation .isos for other Linux distributions that support Sugar and create your own bootable images with Sugar installed. See [[QEMU]] or [[VirtualBox]] for how to run an image, and [[Supported systems]] for more information on what is available.<br /> <br /> ==Other virtual machines==<br /> ==='''[[VirtualBox]]'''===<br /> * Appliance of Sugar on a Stick v3 [[Sugar on a Stick/Mirabelle|Mirabelle]]&lt;br&gt;[http://people.sugarlabs.org/Tgillard/soas-v3-MirabelleREADME_FIRST.txt read this first]<br /> :'''download and import 3 files''': [http://people.sugarlabs.org/Tgillard/soas-v3-Mirabelle.ovf soas-v3-Mirabelle.ovf] [http://people.sugarlabs.org/Tgillard/soas-v3-Mirabelle.mf soas-v3-Mirabelle.mf] [http://people.sugarlabs.org/Tgillard/soas-v3-Mirabelle.vmdk soas-v3-Mirabelle.vmdk]<br /> <br /> * Appliance of Sugar on a Stick v2 [[Sugar on a Stick/Blueberry|Blueberry]]&lt;br&gt;[http://people.sugarlabs.org/Tgillard/soas-2-blueberry_ovf_README_FIRST.txt read this first]<br /> :'''download and import 3 files''': [http://people.sugarlabs.org/Tgillard/soas-2-blueberry.ovf soas-2-blueberry.ovf] [http://people.sugarlabs.org/Tgillard/soas-2-blueberry.mf soas-2-blueberry.mf] [http://people.sugarlabs.org/Tgillard/soas-2-blueberry.vmdk soas-2-blueberry.vmdk]<br /> <br /> * VirtualBox disc image of Sugar on a Stick v1 [[Sugar on a Stick/Strawberry|Strawberry]]&lt;br&gt;See [[VirtualBox#Sugar_on_a_Stick|SoaS on VirtualBox]] for more context.<br /> : [http://www.sugarlabs.org/static/soas/soas-strawberry-vdi.zip soas-strawberry-vdi.zip] Sugar 0.84 (22 June 2009) <br /> <br /> * Appliance of openSUSE-Sugar-11.3 [http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Education/images/iso/openSUSE-Sugar-11.3.i686-1.0.0-Build6.3.iso] Uploaded 26 September 2010&lt;br&gt;<br /> :'''download and import 3 files''':openSUSE_sugar.ovf [http://people.sugarlabs.org/Tgillard/openSUSE_sugar.ovf openSUSE_sugar.ovf] [http://people.sugarlabs.org/Tgillard/openSUSE_sugar.mf openSUSE_sugar.mf] [http://people.sugarlabs.org/Tgillard/openSUSE-Sugar-11.3.vmdk mfopenSUSE-Sugar-11.3.vmdk]<br /> ::8-GB VirtualBox hard disc<br /> ::English and English keyboard<br /> ::USA-Los Angeles (Pacific timezone)<br /> ::Autologin- user=sugar password=sugaruser<br /> :::Ready to auto-configure to your hardware on first booting.<br /> :::'''note choose /dev/sda2 when prompted to do so on first run'''<br /> <br /> * Appliance of '''U'''buntu'''S'''ugar'''''R'''emix''<br /> : Reference links: [[Community/Distributions/Ubuntu]], https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Sugar<br /> <br /> :'''download and import 3 files''': [http://people.sugarlabs.org/Tgillard/USR-922-IRC-Remix.ovf USR-922-IRC-Remix.ovf] [http://people.sugarlabs.org/Tgillard/USR-922-IRC-Remix.mf USR-922-IRC-Remix.mf] [http://people.sugarlabs.org/Tgillard/USR-i386-20100922.vmdk USR-i386-20100922.vmdk]<br /> ::TZ=LA USA USA Keyboard 8-GB HD fully updated on 22 September 2010 with<br /> ::apt-get Updates<br /> ::apt-get Upgrade<br /> ::Remixed to add<br /> :::Surf-115.xo browser<br /> :::IRC.xo -(edited to log in to #sugar and #ubuntu-sugarteam)<br /> :::Analyze.xo<br /> :::'''Import the 3 files into Oracle Virtualbox'''<br /> ::: User=sugar autologin<br /> ::: Password=sugaruser<br /> <br /> You need to install the virtualbox guest additions with ''sudo apt-get install virtualbox-ose-guest-utils''<br /> <br /> ==='''[[VMware]] Player'''===<br /> * VMware Player appliance of [[Sugar on a Stick/Beta |nightly composes of Sugar on a Stick]] (soas-i386-20100818.16.iso)<br /> :[http://people.sugarlabs.org/Tgillard/soas-i386-20100818-Vmplayer-ReadMe.txt read this first]<br /> :[http://people.sugarlabs.org/Tgillard/soas-i386-20100818-Vmplayer.tar.bz2 download]<br /> * VMware Player of Sugar on a Stick v2 (Blueberry)<br /> :[http://people.sugarlabs.org/Tgillard/Blueberry-vmx.txt read this first]<br /> :[http://people.sugarlabs.org/Tgillard/Blueberry-vmx.tar.gz download]<br /> * Open-suse-education<br /> :[[VMware#openSUSE |read this first]]<br /> :[http://sourceforge.net/projects/opensuse-edu/files/Sugar/openSUSE-Sugar-vmware-vmx.tar.bz2/download download]<br /> :[[VMware#change_networking|networking help]]<br /> :[http://old-en.opensuse.org/How_to_use_downloaded_SUSE_Studio_appliances how to use]<br /> <br /> ==='''[[QEMU]]'''===<br /> :[[Sugar_Creation_Kit#QEMU_Virtualization|instructions, downloads]]<br /> == Image installation tools ==<br /> ==='''[[Sugar_on_a_Stick/ZyX-LiveInstaller|ZyX-LiveInstaller]]'''===<br /> : ZyX-LiveInstaller allows you to install Sugar from either a booted Live USB device or Live CD media to a system or external disk. It creates a traditional operating system installation on disk (or removable media such as SD or USB storage devices).<br /> : This program can be useful for installing to a virtualized hard disk. It is not included in builds after soas-v2 Blueberry, so it must be downloaded and installed to use.<br /> : In a running SoaS Terminal session or console, execute the following commands:<br /> : {{Code|su}} <br /> : {{Code|yum install zyx-liveinstaller gparted}}<br /> <br /> ===easyvmx===<br /> :'''Make a VMplayer Appliance with-out needing copy of VMworkstation'''<br /> *web site that builds a vmx file to your specifications (free)<br /> ::'''http://www.easyvmx.com/'''<br /> : Works Fine, runs on most platforms, and has persistence<br /> : VMplayer download (free):https://www.vmware.com/tryvmware/<br /> <br /> :EXAMPLE: soas-i386-20100926.17.iso burned to a CD<br /> <br /> ::specified a 8 GB Hard Drive and other parameters<br /> ::downloaded, in browse, the Custom vmx file as a .zip file<br /> ::Decompressed the .zip file<br /> ::Put soas-i386-20100926.17 CD in your CD Drive<br /> ::Open VMPlayer and point it to this vmx file<br /> ::CD boots in VMplayer application<br /> ::Sugar Starts<br /> *To install to VMplayer Hard Disk:<br /> :Open Sugar-terminal:<br /> su<br /> liveinst<br /> Anaconda installer opens<br /> Initialize all disks<br /> Install procedes normally<br /> reboot<br /> firstboot<br /> Log in to user you specified<br /> <br /> '''HINT: put the VMplayer Hard Disk Files on a 2 GB USB stick.'''<br /> ::'''(note runs about 10x slower on a USB stick)'''<br /> ::Example above created a 1.4 GB set of files'<br /> :Copy-Paste all files<br /> : Sugar on a Stick in VM Player form with persistence<br /> ::Portable (Student can take home and run on home Computer)<br /> ::Run it on different Platforms<br /> <br /> ==Sugar on a Stick==<br /> {{Dated}}<br /> Current<br /> <br /> * '''Mirabelle-v3 (Current)''' [http://spins.fedoraproject.org/soas/#downloads]<br /> * [[Sugar_on_a_Stick/Downloads|SoaS Downloads page]] (includes Legal Torrent sites) - See [[Sugar on a Stick/Strawberry | SoaS Strawberry]] and [[Sugar_on_a_Stick| Main SoaS ]] pages for more context.<br /> * [[VMware#Soas-Strawberry.iso_installed_to_VM_Hard_Disk]]How TO: Soas-strawberry VMPlayer Appliance<br /> * [[VMware#Prebuilt_Sugar_Appliance]]openSUSE prebuilt vmx file<br /> <br /> Prebuilt VirtualBox Appliances:<br /> <br /> * Blueberry-v2: [http://people.sugarlabs.org/Tgillard/Blueberry-vmx.tar.gz] ReadME:[http://people.sugarlabs.org/Tgillard/Blueberry-vmx.txt]<br /> * '''Mirabelle-v3-(Current)''': [[Sugar_Creation_Kit#Prebuilt_Virtualbox_Appliance]] ReadME:[http://people.sugarlabs.org/Tgillard/soas-v3-MirabelleREADME_FIRST.txt]<br /> <br /> Older builds<br /> <br /> * [http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/ Sugar on a Stick downloads]<br /> * [http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/snapshots/2/ Snapshots] 0.84, bleeding edge<br /> * [http://www.sugarlabs.org/static/soas/soas-beta-1.zip soas-beta-1 Zip] vdi (dated: 20 April 2009) for use with [[VirtualBox]]<br /> * [http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/VMware Boot USB Stick with VMPlayer and VM Appliances] (testing)<br /> <br /> ==Routine (formerly daily) Builds==<br /> <br /> * [[olpc:Rainbow]] Security testing. Not recommended for Sugar users.<br /> * [http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/rawhide-xo/?C=M;O=D Fedora Rawhide] Both .isos and .imgs. These are [https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-olpc-list/2009-May/msg00059.html no longer LiveCD images], so changes will persist between boots.<br /> * [[olpc:Joyride]] Not being maintained; to be replaced by builds of various Linux distributions.<br /> <br /> ==XO 1.5 test==<br /> <br /> Fedora 11 with Sugar 0.84 and Gnome. There are [http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/rawhide-xo/ preliminary versions] of this software built for XO 1.0, in .img and .iso files. In a menu at the bottom of the initial screen, you can choose either Sugar or Gnome sessions before logging in.<br /> <br /> [[olpc:User:cjb|Chris Ball]] promises a regular release schedule of 1.5 builds by the time XO 1.5 prototypes enter production. If you're interested in contributing or testing, they would certainly love your help. You can find them on the [http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-olpc-list fedora-olpc mailing list], and freenode IRC's #fedora-olpc channel.<br /> <br /> ==Releases==<br /> <br /> * Prebuilt Sugar 0.84 images are not yet regularly available.<br /> * [[Community/Distributions/Fedora|Fedora]] [https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-olpc-list/2008-December/msg00061.html Sugar Spin] [http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/olpc/0.82-2/i686/sugar-spin.iso image]<br /> *: NOTE:later Fedora 12 SUGAR 0.86 Spin: http://spins.fedoraproject.org/edu/<br /> * [[olpc:XS_LiveCD XS Installer]] '''Warning''': If you are not paying attention, this will format your hard drive. Of course, if you boot this in kvd/qemu/VirtualBox alongside an empty hard drive image, you probably want it to format your drive image and install the School Server.<br /> * Various [[Supported systems|Linux distro installation images]], where Sugar can be installed from packages: Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu Intrepid (but not Jaunty so far), ALT Linux, Mandriva, Caixa Mágica, Gentoo, OpenSUSE, Slackware. Not all of them work. Note that the command to start Sugar is usually 'sugar-emulator'. The command 'sugar' will seem to start, but will have a broken UI, and packages will not start.<br /> <br /> ==Live CDs==<br /> <br /> * [[olpc:Live_Cd| Live CDs]] by Wolfgang Rohrmoser (8.2)<br /> * [[Live_CD|Build your own Sugar Live CDs]]<br /> * [[0.84/Sugar LiveCD|Sugar 0.84 LiveCD proposal]]<br /> <br /> ==sugar-jhbuild==<br /> <br /> * [http://download.sugarlabs.org/sugar/liveimages/debian-jhbuild/binary.iso binary.iso] 27-Nov-2008. You would do better to install Fedora in an image, and build sugar-jhbuild there. Unfortunately, sugar-jhbuild does not build reliably on Debian-based distributions.<br /> <br /> ==Sugar on Windows Installer==<br /> <br /> * [[Supported_systems/Windows]]<br /> <br /> ==See also==<br /> <br /> * [http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2008-September/019643.html Tom van Overbeek describes how to run Sugar using QEMU]</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Global_education_conference&diff=57694 2010-09-29T23:06:34Z

<p>Tabitha: Created page with &quot; == Global Education Conference 15-19 November 2010 == The 2010 Global Education Conference will be held November 15 - 19, 2010, online and free - I am wondering how much Sugar...&quot;</p> <hr /> <div><br /> == Global Education Conference 15-19 November 2010 ==<br /> <br /> <br /> The 2010 Global Education Conference will be held November 15 - 19, 2010, online and free - I am wondering how much Sugar community support I could get if I proposed a Sugar session, It would mean that before the session attendees would need to download Sugar on a Stick, I think it would be good if we had community involved and able to help with running it in more than just English and helping people, anyone want to be involved?<br /> <br /> I am thinking of proposing an open discussion, where people who have tried downloading Sugar on a Stick and using it give us feedback on their experience and can ask questions of the Sugar community. If people are having installation problems we divert them to IRC channel (maybe #sugar-newbies) for instant support, and keep the elluminate session focused on education benefits, suggestions, etc.<br /> <br /> So far we have English and Hindi listed, thanks Manu for offering support for this session and bringing your experience with grade 6 and 7 in New Delhi Sugar on a Stick deployment.</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=%22global_education_conference%22&diff=57693 2010-09-29T23:04:53Z

<p>Tabitha: Created page with &quot; == Global Education Conference 15-19 November 2010 == The 2010 Global Education Conference will be held November 15 - 19, 2010, online and free - I am wondering how much Sugar...&quot;</p> <hr /> <div><br /> == Global Education Conference 15-19 November 2010 ==<br /> <br /> The 2010 Global Education Conference will be held November 15 - 19, 2010, online and free - I am wondering how much Sugar community support I could get if I proposed a Sugar session, It would mean that before the session attendees would need to download Sugar on a Stick, I think it would be good if we had community involved and able to help with running it in more than just English and helping people, anyone want to be involved?<br /> <br /> I am thinking of proposing an open discussion, where people who have tried downloading Sugar on a Stick and using it give us feedback on their experience and can ask questions of the Sugar community. If people are having installation problems we divert them to IRC channel (maybe #sugar-newbies) for instant support, and keep the elluminate session focused on education benefits, suggestions, etc.<br /> <br /> So far we have English and Hindi listed, thanks Manu for offering support for this session and bringing your experience with grade 6 and 7 in New Delhi Sugar on a Stick deployment.</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=User:Tabitha&diff=52456 2010-05-25T09:33:46Z

<p>Tabitha: </p> <hr /> <div>{| class=&quot;wikitable&quot;<br /> |-<br /> |-<br /> | [[image:Tabitha.jpg]]<br /> | Kia ora<br /> I am Tabitha Roder. I coordinate the [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_New_Zealand volunteer efforts in New Zealand]. We have a volunteer group based in Wellington that started meeting weekly middle of 2008 and are still going strong. We have another volunteer group in Auckland who also meet weekly. We are spreading out across the country, with volunteers in Christchurch, Tauranga, and Hamilton. <br /> <br /> We use [http://laptop.org.nz laptop.org.nz] to keep people informed about what we are doing.<br /> <br /> [http://www-old.laptop.org/team/index.php/User:Shiny/Interviews/TabithaRoder An interview about me completed by Brenda]<br /> <br /> Join our mail distribution list: [[http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/olpc-nz olpc-nz]]<br /> <br /> In January 2010 I was education miniconf organiser at [http://lca2010.org.nz LCA2010] where we showed the XO laptop and had a hacking sugar session. I also ensure XOs make it to other events related to education and or to computing. <br /> <br /> Kotahi tamaiti, Kotahi rorohiko iti: nō Aotearoa<br /> <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Some ways to find me:<br /> {|<br /> <br /> ||Emailing<br /> ||[mailto:tabitha@tabitha.net.nz tabitha@tabitha.net.nz]<br /> ||IRC tabs<br /> ||freenode.net - #olpc-au<br /> |-<br /> ||Twitter <br /> ||[http://twitter.com/tabitharoder tabitharoder]<br /> ||Identi.ca <br /> ||[http://identi.ca/tabitha tabitha]<br /> |-<br /> ||Facebook <br /> ||[http://www.facebook.com/tabitharoder tabitharoder]<br /> ||Skype <br /> ||tabitharoder<br /> |-<br /> ||LinkedIn <br /> ||[http://www.linkedin.com/in/tabitharoder tabitharoder]<br /> ||My blog <br /> ||[http://tabitha.net.nz/mahara/view/view.php?id=4 using Mahara]<br /> |-<br /> ||Facebook <br /> ||Join [http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=106404228986 group]<br /> ||My website <br /> ||[http://tabitha.net.nz/moodle using Moodle]<br /> |}</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=User:Tabitha/Events/LCA2010&diff=42742 2010-01-09T19:36:21Z

<p>Tabitha: /* Schedule */</p> <hr /> <div>= LCA 2010 =<br /> <br /> [[File:LCA2010_logo.png|right]]<br /> <br /> == Event Details ==<br /> <br /> 18 - 23 January 2010, Wellington New Zealand<br /> <br /> For more information, go to the [http://www.lca2010.org.nz/ LCA2010 website].<br /> <br /> == Sugar Organizer ==<br /> <br /> [[User:Tabitha | Tabitha Roder]] (tabitha at hrdnz dot com) will be organizing Sugar's presence at LCA2010.<br /> <br /> == Attendees ==<br /> <br /> Are you planning to attend? Add your name and contact info below!<br /> <br /> # Tabitha Roder (tabitha at hrdnz dot com)<br /> # Alastair Munro<br /> # Brenda Wallace<br /> # Grant Patterson<br /> # Tim McNamara<br /> <br /> == Lodging ==<br /> <br /> See [http://www.lca2010.org.nz/ LCA2010 website]<br /> <br /> == Schedule ==<br /> <br /> See [http://www.lca2010.org.nz/ LCA2010 website]<br /> <br /> During the Education Miniconference: Tuesday 19 January at 11:30am. Workshop - how to hack Sugar activities layout.<br /> During the Open Day: Saturday 23 January 11am-2pm. Get some Sugar - SoaS and Sugar installation help stand.<br /> <br /> [[Category:Event]]<br /> <br /> __NOTOC__</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=User:Tabitha/Events/LCA2010&diff=42741 2010-01-09T19:34:40Z

<p>Tabitha: /* Attendees */</p> <hr /> <div>= LCA 2010 =<br /> <br /> [[File:LCA2010_logo.png|right]]<br /> <br /> == Event Details ==<br /> <br /> 18 - 23 January 2010, Wellington New Zealand<br /> <br /> For more information, go to the [http://www.lca2010.org.nz/ LCA2010 website].<br /> <br /> == Sugar Organizer ==<br /> <br /> [[User:Tabitha | Tabitha Roder]] (tabitha at hrdnz dot com) will be organizing Sugar's presence at LCA2010.<br /> <br /> == Attendees ==<br /> <br /> Are you planning to attend? Add your name and contact info below!<br /> <br /> # Tabitha Roder (tabitha at hrdnz dot com)<br /> # Alastair Munro<br /> # Brenda Wallace<br /> # Grant Patterson<br /> # Tim McNamara<br /> <br /> == Lodging ==<br /> <br /> See [http://www.lca2010.org.nz/ LCA2010 website]<br /> <br /> == Schedule ==<br /> <br /> See [http://www.lca2010.org.nz/ LCA2010 website]<br /> <br /> [[Category:Event]]<br /> <br /> __NOTOC__</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Marketing_Team/Presentations&diff=42740 2010-01-09T19:04:11Z

<p>Tabitha: /* Previous events */</p> <hr /> <div>{{TOCright}}<br /> {{Dated}}<br /> == Sugar Labs bullet points ==<br /> <br /> * [[How to present Sugar]]<br /> * [[:Image:Sugarlabs-onepager.odp|A one-slide overview]] of Sugar Labs<br /> * [[:Image:Sugarlabs-bullets.odp]]<br /> <br /> == Previous events ==<br /> ===2010===<br /> * [http://docs.google.com/present/edit?id=0AaE4gRWaGNm1ZHFyaDNqcl8xOWNjeDV4eGg2&amp;hl=en OLPC/Sugarlabs overview and workshop on hacking activity layouts] - [http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:Tabitha LCA2010], presentation by [http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:Tabitha Tabitha Roder] and [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Aly Alastair Munro], [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_New_Zealand New Zealand volunteers]; [http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:Tabitha/Events/LCA2010 Event page]<br /> <br /> <br /> ===2009===<br /> <br /> * [http://wiki.laptop.org/images/d/d6/BozLUGTiny.pdf OLPC / Sugar Labs overview presentation]<br /> <br /> ====NECC====<br /> * [[File:NECCunplugged-Bender.pdf]]<br /> <br /> ====FOSSVT====<br /> * [[Image:FOSSVT.xol]]<br /> <br /> ====CoSN (Consortium for School Networking) 2009 Annual Conference, Austin, TX====<br /> '''12 March 2009'''<br /> * [[Media:Sugar_User-Interface_Opportunity.pdf | Sugar User Interface Opportunity]], Anne Gentle presenting on behalf of Walter Bender.<br /> <br /> ====CUE (Computer Using Educators)Conference, Palm Springs CA====<br /> '''March 2009'''<br /> * [[olpc:Image:CUE_XO_03-05-09.pdf | One Laptop Per Child: What's The Fuss All About?]], Caryl Bigenho's overview of OLPC, the XO, and Sugar for Califonia Educators. Ppt version to follow.<br /> <br /> ==== FOSDEM 2009 ====<br /> <br /> * [[Media:FOSDEM2009.odp|The Sugar platform: Why GNOME may care?]] by Tomeu Vizoso<br /> <br /> ===2008===<br /> <br /> * [[:Image:Netbook.odp| Walter's Netbook World Summit talk]]<br /> <br /> * [http://stud4.tuwien.ac.at/~e0425826/FUDCon.odp FUDCon 2008 Brno] (Christoph Derndorfer)<br /> <br /> * [http://www.codewiz.org/pub/sugar/slides/SugarBeagle.odp ESC Boston 2008] ([[User:Bernie|Bernie Innocenti]])<br /> <br /> * [http://www.codewiz.org/pub/sugar/slides/ Bernie's collection of OLPC &amp; Sugar marketing material]<br /> <br /> * [[:Image:Bolzano.odp| Walter's talk in Bolzano, Italy]]<br /> <br /> * [[:Image:USMP.odp|Walter's talk at the University of San Martin de Porres, Lima Peru]]<br /> <br /> === 2008 SugarCamp ===<br /> <br /> Video for many of these is available in raw form at http://download.laptop.org/content/conf/20081117-sugarcamp/ -- help is welcome in editing &amp; converting to free formats!<br /> <br /> John Tierney was so nice to share with us the mind maps he took while attending the talks: [[Image:SugarCamp_Mind_Map_Collection.pdf]].<br /> <br /> === Monday ===<br /> <br /> * [http://www.codewiz.org/pub/olpc/slides/sugarcamp/SugarcampIntro.odp Sugarcamp intro] ([[User:Bernie|Bernie Innocenti]])<br /> <br /> === Tuesday ===<br /> <br /> * [http://people.collabora.co.uk/~cassidy/talks/sugar-camp-collab-archi-and-state-of-implementation.pdf Collaboration state of the art] (Guillaume Desmottes)<br /> <br /> * [http://people.collabora.co.uk/~cassidy/talks/sugar-camp-futur-of-collab.pdf Future of collaboration] (Guillaume Desmottes)<br /> <br /> * [http://docs.google.com/EmbedSlideshow?docid=dcfrb5jw_1dqrh9sgr The medium is the message] (Yama)<br /> <br /> === Wednesday ===<br /> <br /> * [[Media:Sugarcamp-cscott-legacy.pdf | Desktop legacy compatibility]] ([[User:CScott|CScott]])<br /> * [[Media:I18n.pdf | Internationalization]] (Sayamindu)<br /> * [http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=users/cscott/talks;a=blob_plain;f=sugarcamp-i18n.pdf;hb=HEAD Internationalization] ([[User:CScott|CScott]])<br /> * [http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=users/cscott/talks;a=blob_plain;f=sugarcamp-misc.pdf;hb=HEAD Misc. Topics] ([[User:CScott|CScott]])<br /> * [Media:Sugarcamp-cscott-network.pdf | Network]] ([[User:CScott|CScott]])<br /> <br /> === Thursday ===<br /> <br /> * [[Media:Sugar-meeting.odp|working with users Open Office presentation by Greg Smith]]<br /> * [http://www.resara.com/presentation.ppt Resara and LTSP by Brendan Powers] (PowerPoint &amp;mdash; [http://docs.google.com/Presentation?id=dcvvrqtp_241fjp7rdgm view in Google Docs])<br /> * [http://docs.google.com/Presentation?id=dddknwgs_360gwgwbnf2 Caroline Meeks - Sugar on a Stick]<br /> * [http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=users/cscott/talks;a=blob_plain;f=sugarcamp-collab.pdf;hb=HEAD Collaboration] ([[User:CScott|CScott]])<br /> <br /> === Friday ===<br /> <br /> * [[Media:Portfolios.odp|Sugar portfolios presentation by Walter Bender and Evangeline Harris Stefanakis]]<br /> * [[Media:SugarLabsOverview.odp|Sugar Labs overview by Walter Bender]]<br /> * [http://www.christianmarcschmidt.com/components/schmidt_sugar_design.pdf Design Opportunities for Sugar, by Christian Marc Schmidt and Eben Eliason]<br /> <br /> === Saturday ===<br /> * [http://www.codewiz.org/pub/sugar/slides/sugarcamp/SugarLabsInfrastructure.odp Sugar Labs infrastructure] ([[User:Bernie|Bernie Innocenti]])</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Teacher%27s_Tools&diff=42701 2010-01-08T08:58:52Z

<p>Tabitha: /* Overview */</p> <hr /> <div>=Overview=<br /> This is a collection of tools designed for using in the classroom by teachers to make their lives easier.<br /> <br /> ==Existing Tools==<br /> <br /> ===[[Pop Quiz]]===<br /> This is an activity originally designed by [[User:acj3840|Alex Jones]] to get quick and organized feedback from students about their knowledge of a subject. Possible uses include but are not limited to: quizzes, surveys, and polls.</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=User:Tabitha&diff=42487 2010-01-02T04:04:25Z

<p>Tabitha: </p> <hr /> <div>{| class=&quot;wikitable&quot;<br /> |-<br /> |-<br /> | [[image:Tabitha.jpg]]<br /> | Kia ora<br /> I am Tabitha Roder. I coordinate the [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_New_Zealand volunteer efforts in New Zealand]. We have a volunteer group based in Wellington that started meeting weekly middle of 2008 and are still going strong. We are spreading out across the country, with a group in Auckland (meeting fortnightly) and Christchurch. <br /> <br /> We use [http://laptop.org.nz laptop.org.nz] to keep people informed about what we are doing.<br /> <br /> [http://www-old.laptop.org/team/index.php/User:Shiny/Interviews/TabithaRoder An interview about me completed by Brenda]<br /> <br /> Join our mail distribution list: [[http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/olpc-nz olpc-nz]]<br /> <br /> To ensure I don't have too much spare time, I am also the [http://lca2010.org.nz LCA2010] education miniconf organiser<br /> <br /> Kotahi tamaiti, Kotahi rorohiko iti: nō Aotearoa<br /> <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> Some ways to find me:<br /> {|<br /> <br /> ||Emailing<br /> ||[mailto:tabitha@hrdnz.com tabitha@hrdnz.com]<br /> ||IRC tabs<br /> ||freenode.net - #olpc-au<br /> |-<br /> ||Twitter <br /> ||[http://twitter.com/tabitharoder tabitharoder]<br /> ||Identi.ca <br /> ||[http://identi.ca/tabitha tabitha]<br /> |-<br /> ||Facebook <br /> ||[http://www.facebook.com/tabitharoder tabitharoder]<br /> ||Skype <br /> ||tabitharoder<br /> |-<br /> ||LinkedIn <br /> ||[http://www.linkedin.com/in/tabitharoder tabitharoder]<br /> ||My blog <br /> ||[http://eduspaces.net/tabithar/weblog tabithar]<br /> |}<br /> <br /> Join our [http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=106404228986 Facebook group]</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=User:Tabitha&diff=40548 2009-11-24T07:17:09Z

<p>Tabitha: </p> <hr /> <div>{| class=&quot;wikitable&quot;<br /> |-<br /> |-<br /> | [[image:Tabitha.jpg]]<br /> | Kia ora<br /> I am Tabitha Roder. I coordinate the [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_New_Zealand volunteer efforts in New Zealand]. We have a volunteer group based in Wellington that started meeting weekly middle of 2008 and are still going strong. We are spreading out across the country, with a group in Auckland (meeting fortnightly) and Christchurch. <br /> <br /> We use [http://laptop.org.nz laptop.org.nz] to keep people informed about what we are doing.<br /> <br /> Join our mail distribution list: [[http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/olpc-nz olpc-nz]]<br /> <br /> To ensure I don't have too much spare time, I am also the [http://lca2010.org.nz LCA2010] education miniconf organiser<br /> <br /> Kotahi tamaiti, Kotahi rorohiko iti: nō Aotearoa<br /> <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> Some ways to find me:<br /> {|<br /> <br /> ||Emailing<br /> ||[mailto:tabitha@hrdnz.com tabitha@hrdnz.com]<br /> ||IRC tabs<br /> ||freenode.net - #olpc-au<br /> |-<br /> ||Twitter <br /> ||[http://twitter.com/tabitharoder tabitharoder]<br /> ||Identi.ca <br /> ||[http://identi.ca/tabitha tabitha]<br /> |-<br /> ||Facebook <br /> ||[http://www.facebook.com/tabitharoder tabitharoder]<br /> ||Skype <br /> ||tabitharoder<br /> |-<br /> ||LinkedIn <br /> ||[http://www.linkedin.com/in/tabitharoder tabitharoder]<br /> ||My blog <br /> ||[http://eduspaces.net/tabithar/weblog tabithar]<br /> |}<br /> <br /> Join our [http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=106404228986 Facebook group]</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=User:Tabitha&diff=39049 2009-10-09T21:05:59Z

<p>Tabitha: </p> <hr /> <div>{| class=&quot;wikitable&quot;<br /> |-<br /> |-<br /> | [[image:Tabitha.jpg]]<br /> | Kia ora<br /> I am Tabitha Roder. I coordinate the [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_New_Zealand volunteer efforts in New Zealand]. We have a volunteer group based in Wellington that started meeting weekly middle of 2008 and are still going strong. We are spreading out across the country, with a group in Auckland and Christchurch. <br /> <br /> We use [http://laptop.org.nz laptop.org.nz] to keep people informed about what we are doing.<br /> <br /> Join our mail distribution list: [[http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/olpc-nz olpc-nz]]<br /> <br /> To ensure I don't have too much spare time, I am also the [http://lca2010.org.nz LCA2010] education miniconf organiser<br /> <br /> Kotahi tamaiti, Kotahi rorohiko iti: nō Aotearoa<br /> <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> Some ways to find me:<br /> {|<br /> <br /> ||Emailing<br /> ||[mailto:tabitha@hrdnz.com tabitha@hrdnz.com]<br /> ||IRC tabs<br /> ||freenode.net - #olpc-au<br /> |-<br /> ||Twitter <br /> ||[http://twitter.com/tabitharoder tabitharoder]<br /> ||Identi.ca <br /> ||[http://identi.ca/tabitha tabitha]<br /> |-<br /> ||Facebook <br /> ||[http://www.facebook.com/tabitharoder tabitharoder]<br /> ||Skype <br /> ||tabitharoder<br /> |-<br /> ||LinkedIn <br /> ||[http://www.linkedin.com/in/tabitharoder tabitharoder]<br /> ||My blog <br /> ||[http://eduspaces.net/tabithar/weblog tabithar]<br /> |}<br /> <br /> Join our [http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=106404228986 Facebook group]</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Decision_panels/SOAS/Report&diff=39031 2009-10-09T09:23:26Z

<p>Tabitha: /* Question 3 */</p> <hr /> <div>&lt;center&gt;'''''This is a draft, and not a final report.'''''&lt;/center&gt;<br /> <br /> ===Introduction===<br /> <br /> This constitutes the report of the SoaS decision panel (DP), [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008746.html convened by SLOB].<br /> <br /> The structure of this report is:<br /> <br /> # Introduction (this section)<br /> # Executive Summary<br /> # Mandate<br /> # Members<br /> # Report on Questions 1-3<br /> # Conclusion<br /> # Appendices<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Executive Summary===<br /> <br /> The Decision Panel was [[#Mandate|mandated]] to answer three questions. The Decision Panel's answers are below:<br /> <br /> ;Question 1: &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot;<br /> ;Answer: [[#Question_1|TBD - see below for opinions]]<br /> <br /> ;Question 2: &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot;<br /> ;Answer: [[#Question_2|TBD - see below for opinions]]<br /> <br /> ;Question 3: &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot;<br /> ;Answer: [[#Question_3|TBD - see below for opinions]]<br /> <br /> <br /> In addition, [[#Mandate|the mandate]] allows the Decision Panel to raise and answer any other question the DP deems required to provide an answer to the original question: &quot;Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?&quot; (Question 0).<br /> <br /> The Decision Panel has not raised any additional questions, outside of requesting clarification of terms in questions 2 and 3. <br /> <br /> ===Mandate===<br /> <br /> {{quote|<br /> :&quot;Investigate the situation of how SoaS should be treated by Sugar Labs, and related questions, including answers to the following:<br /> :* &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot;<br /> :* &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot;<br /> :* &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot;<br /> :* Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question:&quot;Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?&quot;<br /> }}<br /> <br /> ===Members===<br /> <br /> * Sebastian Dziallas<br /> * Luke Faraone<br /> * Martin Dengler<br /> * Bill Bogstad<br /> * Faisal Khan<br /> * Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> * Samuel Klein<br /> * Sean Daly<br /> * Tabitha Roder<br /> * Caryl Bigenho<br /> * Daniel Drake<br /> * Abhishek Indoria<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Report on Questions 1-3===<br /> <br /> ==== Q1: OS distributor v. upstream ====<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 1: &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot;<br /> <br /> '''Proposed answers:'''<br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; class=&quot;wikitable&quot; style=&quot;border-collapse:collapse;&quot;<br /> |-<br /> !width=25%| Yes<br /> !width=25%| No<br /> !width=25%| Invalid<br /> ! Undecided<br /> |-<br /> |<br /> # Yes. Without it Sugar Labs has nothing to encourage the use of or promote that is of direct use to anyone other then programmers or the people who assemble Linux distributions. [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000029.html (reference)] [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000032.html counterpoint]. There is real interest and are real plans to do this [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000100.html (reference)].<br /> # Yes. We greatly appreciate the work of those who have contributed to SoaS Strawberry and Blueberry. We regard these products as valuable, critical distribution mechanism for Sugar, and we will do what we can to ensure their continued development. [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008681.html (reference)]<br /> |<br /> # No, not now. SL is not now a full-service GNU/Linux distributor and being one is not in SL's [[Sugar Labs#Mission|mission statment]]; &quot;[[What_is_Sugar%3F|Sugar learning platform]]&quot; is *not* a GNU/Linux distribution. [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000056.html counterpoint] [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000057.html counter-counterpoint]. However many contributors volunteer to help with individual tasks thereof; and an official plan is part of a number of SugarLabs' members published plans. Sugar Labs is better off spending its scarce resources on the [[What_is_Sugar%3F|Sugar learning platform]]. Distribution work is is really hard and labour-intensive and being done by major distro vendors already (Debian, Fedora [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000168.html (reference)]<br /> |<br /> # Invalid question. An answer to this question is not needed for Sugar Labs' members to get on with their work, and the results from a decision panel will not have any effect [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008751.html ref].<br /> |<br /> # Undecided. The two sides of the argument don't seem to be speaking directly to one anothers' issue [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000175.html (reference)] [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000178.html counterpoint]<br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ==== Q2: distro endorsement v. neutrality ====<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 2: &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot;<br /> <br /> '''Proposed answers:'''<br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;border-collapse:collapse;&quot;<br /> |-<br /> !width=25%| Yes<br /> !width=25%| No<br /> !width=25%| Invalid<br /> ! Undecided<br /> |-<br /> |<br /> # Yes.<br /> |<br /> # No. Sugar On a Stick, the Fedora-derived distribution, will be the endorsed distribution. SL needs to influence the distribution so drastically that it is effectively controlling it [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000125.html (reference)] [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000128.html counterpoint]<br /> |<br /> # Invalid question. An answer to this question is not needed for Sugar Labs' members to get on with their work, and the results from a decision panel will not have any effect [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008751.html ref].<br /> |<br /> # Undecided: what do &quot;neutral&quot; and &quot;endorse&quot; mean? We need to be more clear about these definitions in order to answer [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000169.html (reference)]<br /> |}<br /> <br /> ==== Q3: SoaS name ====<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 3: &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot;<br /> <br /> '''Proposed answers:'''<br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;border-collapse:collapse;&quot;<br /> |-<br /> !width=25%| Yes<br /> !width=25%| No<br /> !width=25%| Invalid<br /> ! Undecided<br /> |-<br /> |<br /> # Yes. Sugar on a Stick is the central pillar of our marketing strategy [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000048.html (reference)]. It's not trademarked, but should be [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000045.html (reference)]. SL does not want to confuse its users and a light touch like this is all that's needed [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008403.html (reference)]<br /> |<br /> # No.<br /> |<br /> # Invalid question. An answer to this question is not needed for Sugar Labs' members to get on with their work, and the results from a decision panel will not have any effect [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008751.html ref].<br /> |<br /> # Undecided. While it's reasonable for SL as a community to have a &quot;don't be confusing&quot; policy that applies equally to all of its projects, that has nothing to do with trademark per se. [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000175.html (reference)]<br /> |}<br /> <br /> ===Conclusion===<br /> ''to come''<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Appendices===<br /> <br /> ==== Recorded opinions ====<br /> <br /> ===== Question 1 =====<br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;border-collapse:collapse;&quot;<br /> |+ Question 1: &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing<br /> Sugar releases?&quot;<br /> |-<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| Yes<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| No<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| Defer<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| Invalid<br /> ! Undecided <br /> |-<br /> | &lt;!-- yes --&gt;<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000100.html Sean Daly]<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000029.html Bill Bogstead]<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]<br /> # Luke Faraone<br /> | &lt;!-- no --&gt;<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000154.html Tabitha Roder]<br /> # Caryl Bigenho<br /> | &lt;!-- defer --&gt;<br /> # Samuel Klein<br /> | &lt;!-- invalid question --&gt;<br /> | &lt;!-- undecided --&gt;<br /> # Sebastian Dziallas<br /> # Faisal Khan<br /> # Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> # Daniel Drake<br /> |}<br /> <br /> =====Question 2=====<br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;border-collapse:collapse;&quot;<br /> |+ Question 2: &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot;<br /> |-<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| Yes<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| No<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| Defer<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| Invalid<br /> ! Undecided <br /> |-<br /> | &lt;!-- yes --&gt;<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000154.html Tabitha Roder]<br /> # Caryl Bigenho<br /> # Luke Faraone<br /> | &lt;!-- no --&gt;<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]<br /> | &lt;!-- defer --&gt;<br /> | &lt;!-- invalid question --&gt;<br /> | &lt;!-- undecided --&gt;<br /> # Sebastian Dziallas<br /> # Martin Dengler<br /> # Bill Bogstad<br /> # Faisal Khan<br /> # Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> # Samuel Klein<br /> # Daniel Drake<br /> |}<br /> <br /> =====Question 3=====<br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;border-collapse:collapse;&quot;<br /> |+ Question 3: &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot;<br /> |-<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| Yes<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| No<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| Defer<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| Invalid<br /> ! Undecided <br /> |-<br /> | &lt;!-- yes --&gt;<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000045.html Sean Daly]<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000154.html Tabitha Roder]<br /> # Luke Faraone<br /> | &lt;!-- no --&gt;<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]<br /> # Caryl Bigenho<br /> | &lt;!-- defer --&gt; <br /> | &lt;!-- invalid question --&gt;<br /> | &lt;!-- undecided --&gt;<br /> # Bill Bogstad<br /> # Sebastian Dziallas<br /> # Faisal Khan<br /> # Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> # Samuel Klein<br /> # Daniel Drake<br /> |}</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Decision_panels/SOAS/Report&diff=39030 2009-10-09T09:23:09Z

<p>Tabitha: /* Question 2 */</p> <hr /> <div>&lt;center&gt;'''''This is a draft, and not a final report.'''''&lt;/center&gt;<br /> <br /> ===Introduction===<br /> <br /> This constitutes the report of the SoaS decision panel (DP), [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008746.html convened by SLOB].<br /> <br /> The structure of this report is:<br /> <br /> # Introduction (this section)<br /> # Executive Summary<br /> # Mandate<br /> # Members<br /> # Report on Questions 1-3<br /> # Conclusion<br /> # Appendices<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Executive Summary===<br /> <br /> The Decision Panel was [[#Mandate|mandated]] to answer three questions. The Decision Panel's answers are below:<br /> <br /> ;Question 1: &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot;<br /> ;Answer: [[#Question_1|TBD - see below for opinions]]<br /> <br /> ;Question 2: &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot;<br /> ;Answer: [[#Question_2|TBD - see below for opinions]]<br /> <br /> ;Question 3: &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot;<br /> ;Answer: [[#Question_3|TBD - see below for opinions]]<br /> <br /> <br /> In addition, [[#Mandate|the mandate]] allows the Decision Panel to raise and answer any other question the DP deems required to provide an answer to the original question: &quot;Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?&quot; (Question 0).<br /> <br /> The Decision Panel has not raised any additional questions, outside of requesting clarification of terms in questions 2 and 3. <br /> <br /> ===Mandate===<br /> <br /> {{quote|<br /> :&quot;Investigate the situation of how SoaS should be treated by Sugar Labs, and related questions, including answers to the following:<br /> :* &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot;<br /> :* &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot;<br /> :* &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot;<br /> :* Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question:&quot;Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?&quot;<br /> }}<br /> <br /> ===Members===<br /> <br /> * Sebastian Dziallas<br /> * Luke Faraone<br /> * Martin Dengler<br /> * Bill Bogstad<br /> * Faisal Khan<br /> * Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> * Samuel Klein<br /> * Sean Daly<br /> * Tabitha Roder<br /> * Caryl Bigenho<br /> * Daniel Drake<br /> * Abhishek Indoria<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Report on Questions 1-3===<br /> <br /> ==== Q1: OS distributor v. upstream ====<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 1: &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot;<br /> <br /> '''Proposed answers:'''<br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; class=&quot;wikitable&quot; style=&quot;border-collapse:collapse;&quot;<br /> |-<br /> !width=25%| Yes<br /> !width=25%| No<br /> !width=25%| Invalid<br /> ! Undecided<br /> |-<br /> |<br /> # Yes. Without it Sugar Labs has nothing to encourage the use of or promote that is of direct use to anyone other then programmers or the people who assemble Linux distributions. [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000029.html (reference)] [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000032.html counterpoint]. There is real interest and are real plans to do this [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000100.html (reference)].<br /> # Yes. We greatly appreciate the work of those who have contributed to SoaS Strawberry and Blueberry. We regard these products as valuable, critical distribution mechanism for Sugar, and we will do what we can to ensure their continued development. [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008681.html (reference)]<br /> |<br /> # No, not now. SL is not now a full-service GNU/Linux distributor and being one is not in SL's [[Sugar Labs#Mission|mission statment]]; &quot;[[What_is_Sugar%3F|Sugar learning platform]]&quot; is *not* a GNU/Linux distribution. [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000056.html counterpoint] [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000057.html counter-counterpoint]. However many contributors volunteer to help with individual tasks thereof; and an official plan is part of a number of SugarLabs' members published plans. Sugar Labs is better off spending its scarce resources on the [[What_is_Sugar%3F|Sugar learning platform]]. Distribution work is is really hard and labour-intensive and being done by major distro vendors already (Debian, Fedora [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000168.html (reference)]<br /> |<br /> # Invalid question. An answer to this question is not needed for Sugar Labs' members to get on with their work, and the results from a decision panel will not have any effect [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008751.html ref].<br /> |<br /> # Undecided. The two sides of the argument don't seem to be speaking directly to one anothers' issue [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000175.html (reference)] [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000178.html counterpoint]<br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ==== Q2: distro endorsement v. neutrality ====<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 2: &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot;<br /> <br /> '''Proposed answers:'''<br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;border-collapse:collapse;&quot;<br /> |-<br /> !width=25%| Yes<br /> !width=25%| No<br /> !width=25%| Invalid<br /> ! Undecided<br /> |-<br /> |<br /> # Yes.<br /> |<br /> # No. Sugar On a Stick, the Fedora-derived distribution, will be the endorsed distribution. SL needs to influence the distribution so drastically that it is effectively controlling it [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000125.html (reference)] [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000128.html counterpoint]<br /> |<br /> # Invalid question. An answer to this question is not needed for Sugar Labs' members to get on with their work, and the results from a decision panel will not have any effect [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008751.html ref].<br /> |<br /> # Undecided: what do &quot;neutral&quot; and &quot;endorse&quot; mean? We need to be more clear about these definitions in order to answer [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000169.html (reference)]<br /> |}<br /> <br /> ==== Q3: SoaS name ====<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 3: &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot;<br /> <br /> '''Proposed answers:'''<br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;border-collapse:collapse;&quot;<br /> |-<br /> !width=25%| Yes<br /> !width=25%| No<br /> !width=25%| Invalid<br /> ! Undecided<br /> |-<br /> |<br /> # Yes. Sugar on a Stick is the central pillar of our marketing strategy [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000048.html (reference)]. It's not trademarked, but should be [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000045.html (reference)]. SL does not want to confuse its users and a light touch like this is all that's needed [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008403.html (reference)]<br /> |<br /> # No.<br /> |<br /> # Invalid question. An answer to this question is not needed for Sugar Labs' members to get on with their work, and the results from a decision panel will not have any effect [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008751.html ref].<br /> |<br /> # Undecided. While it's reasonable for SL as a community to have a &quot;don't be confusing&quot; policy that applies equally to all of its projects, that has nothing to do with trademark per se. [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000175.html (reference)]<br /> |}<br /> <br /> ===Conclusion===<br /> ''to come''<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Appendices===<br /> <br /> ==== Recorded opinions ====<br /> <br /> ===== Question 1 =====<br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;border-collapse:collapse;&quot;<br /> |+ Question 1: &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing<br /> Sugar releases?&quot;<br /> |-<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| Yes<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| No<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| Defer<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| Invalid<br /> ! Undecided <br /> |-<br /> | &lt;!-- yes --&gt;<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000100.html Sean Daly]<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000029.html Bill Bogstead]<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]<br /> # Luke Faraone<br /> | &lt;!-- no --&gt;<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000154.html Tabitha Roder]<br /> # Caryl Bigenho<br /> | &lt;!-- defer --&gt;<br /> # Samuel Klein<br /> | &lt;!-- invalid question --&gt;<br /> | &lt;!-- undecided --&gt;<br /> # Sebastian Dziallas<br /> # Faisal Khan<br /> # Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> # Daniel Drake<br /> |}<br /> <br /> =====Question 2=====<br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;border-collapse:collapse;&quot;<br /> |+ Question 2: &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot;<br /> |-<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| Yes<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| No<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| Defer<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| Invalid<br /> ! Undecided <br /> |-<br /> | &lt;!-- yes --&gt;<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000154.html Tabitha Roder]<br /> # Caryl Bigenho<br /> # Luke Faraone<br /> | &lt;!-- no --&gt;<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]<br /> | &lt;!-- defer --&gt;<br /> | &lt;!-- invalid question --&gt;<br /> | &lt;!-- undecided --&gt;<br /> # Sebastian Dziallas<br /> # Martin Dengler<br /> # Bill Bogstad<br /> # Faisal Khan<br /> # Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> # Samuel Klein<br /> # Daniel Drake<br /> |}<br /> <br /> =====Question 3=====<br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;border-collapse:collapse;&quot;<br /> |+ Question 3: &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot;<br /> |-<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| Yes<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| No<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| Defer<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| Invalid<br /> ! Undecided <br /> |-<br /> | &lt;!-- yes --&gt;<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000045.html Sean Daly]<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]<br /> # Tabitha Roder<br /> # Luke Faraone<br /> | &lt;!-- no --&gt;<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]<br /> # Caryl Bigenho<br /> | &lt;!-- defer --&gt; <br /> | &lt;!-- invalid question --&gt;<br /> | &lt;!-- undecided --&gt;<br /> # Bill Bogstad<br /> # Sebastian Dziallas<br /> # Faisal Khan<br /> # Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> # Samuel Klein<br /> # Daniel Drake<br /> |}</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Decision_panels/SOAS/Report&diff=39029 2009-10-09T09:22:48Z

<p>Tabitha: /* Question 1 */</p> <hr /> <div>&lt;center&gt;'''''This is a draft, and not a final report.'''''&lt;/center&gt;<br /> <br /> ===Introduction===<br /> <br /> This constitutes the report of the SoaS decision panel (DP), [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008746.html convened by SLOB].<br /> <br /> The structure of this report is:<br /> <br /> # Introduction (this section)<br /> # Executive Summary<br /> # Mandate<br /> # Members<br /> # Report on Questions 1-3<br /> # Conclusion<br /> # Appendices<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Executive Summary===<br /> <br /> The Decision Panel was [[#Mandate|mandated]] to answer three questions. The Decision Panel's answers are below:<br /> <br /> ;Question 1: &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot;<br /> ;Answer: [[#Question_1|TBD - see below for opinions]]<br /> <br /> ;Question 2: &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot;<br /> ;Answer: [[#Question_2|TBD - see below for opinions]]<br /> <br /> ;Question 3: &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot;<br /> ;Answer: [[#Question_3|TBD - see below for opinions]]<br /> <br /> <br /> In addition, [[#Mandate|the mandate]] allows the Decision Panel to raise and answer any other question the DP deems required to provide an answer to the original question: &quot;Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?&quot; (Question 0).<br /> <br /> The Decision Panel has not raised any additional questions, outside of requesting clarification of terms in questions 2 and 3. <br /> <br /> ===Mandate===<br /> <br /> {{quote|<br /> :&quot;Investigate the situation of how SoaS should be treated by Sugar Labs, and related questions, including answers to the following:<br /> :* &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot;<br /> :* &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot;<br /> :* &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot;<br /> :* Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question:&quot;Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?&quot;<br /> }}<br /> <br /> ===Members===<br /> <br /> * Sebastian Dziallas<br /> * Luke Faraone<br /> * Martin Dengler<br /> * Bill Bogstad<br /> * Faisal Khan<br /> * Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> * Samuel Klein<br /> * Sean Daly<br /> * Tabitha Roder<br /> * Caryl Bigenho<br /> * Daniel Drake<br /> * Abhishek Indoria<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Report on Questions 1-3===<br /> <br /> ==== Q1: OS distributor v. upstream ====<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 1: &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot;<br /> <br /> '''Proposed answers:'''<br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; class=&quot;wikitable&quot; style=&quot;border-collapse:collapse;&quot;<br /> |-<br /> !width=25%| Yes<br /> !width=25%| No<br /> !width=25%| Invalid<br /> ! Undecided<br /> |-<br /> |<br /> # Yes. Without it Sugar Labs has nothing to encourage the use of or promote that is of direct use to anyone other then programmers or the people who assemble Linux distributions. [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000029.html (reference)] [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000032.html counterpoint]. There is real interest and are real plans to do this [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000100.html (reference)].<br /> # Yes. We greatly appreciate the work of those who have contributed to SoaS Strawberry and Blueberry. We regard these products as valuable, critical distribution mechanism for Sugar, and we will do what we can to ensure their continued development. [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008681.html (reference)]<br /> |<br /> # No, not now. SL is not now a full-service GNU/Linux distributor and being one is not in SL's [[Sugar Labs#Mission|mission statment]]; &quot;[[What_is_Sugar%3F|Sugar learning platform]]&quot; is *not* a GNU/Linux distribution. [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000056.html counterpoint] [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000057.html counter-counterpoint]. However many contributors volunteer to help with individual tasks thereof; and an official plan is part of a number of SugarLabs' members published plans. Sugar Labs is better off spending its scarce resources on the [[What_is_Sugar%3F|Sugar learning platform]]. Distribution work is is really hard and labour-intensive and being done by major distro vendors already (Debian, Fedora [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000168.html (reference)]<br /> |<br /> # Invalid question. An answer to this question is not needed for Sugar Labs' members to get on with their work, and the results from a decision panel will not have any effect [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008751.html ref].<br /> |<br /> # Undecided. The two sides of the argument don't seem to be speaking directly to one anothers' issue [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000175.html (reference)] [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000178.html counterpoint]<br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ==== Q2: distro endorsement v. neutrality ====<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 2: &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot;<br /> <br /> '''Proposed answers:'''<br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;border-collapse:collapse;&quot;<br /> |-<br /> !width=25%| Yes<br /> !width=25%| No<br /> !width=25%| Invalid<br /> ! Undecided<br /> |-<br /> |<br /> # Yes.<br /> |<br /> # No. Sugar On a Stick, the Fedora-derived distribution, will be the endorsed distribution. SL needs to influence the distribution so drastically that it is effectively controlling it [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000125.html (reference)] [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000128.html counterpoint]<br /> |<br /> # Invalid question. An answer to this question is not needed for Sugar Labs' members to get on with their work, and the results from a decision panel will not have any effect [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008751.html ref].<br /> |<br /> # Undecided: what do &quot;neutral&quot; and &quot;endorse&quot; mean? We need to be more clear about these definitions in order to answer [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000169.html (reference)]<br /> |}<br /> <br /> ==== Q3: SoaS name ====<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 3: &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot;<br /> <br /> '''Proposed answers:'''<br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;border-collapse:collapse;&quot;<br /> |-<br /> !width=25%| Yes<br /> !width=25%| No<br /> !width=25%| Invalid<br /> ! Undecided<br /> |-<br /> |<br /> # Yes. Sugar on a Stick is the central pillar of our marketing strategy [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000048.html (reference)]. It's not trademarked, but should be [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000045.html (reference)]. SL does not want to confuse its users and a light touch like this is all that's needed [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008403.html (reference)]<br /> |<br /> # No.<br /> |<br /> # Invalid question. An answer to this question is not needed for Sugar Labs' members to get on with their work, and the results from a decision panel will not have any effect [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008751.html ref].<br /> |<br /> # Undecided. While it's reasonable for SL as a community to have a &quot;don't be confusing&quot; policy that applies equally to all of its projects, that has nothing to do with trademark per se. [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000175.html (reference)]<br /> |}<br /> <br /> ===Conclusion===<br /> ''to come''<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Appendices===<br /> <br /> ==== Recorded opinions ====<br /> <br /> ===== Question 1 =====<br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;border-collapse:collapse;&quot;<br /> |+ Question 1: &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing<br /> Sugar releases?&quot;<br /> |-<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| Yes<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| No<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| Defer<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| Invalid<br /> ! Undecided <br /> |-<br /> | &lt;!-- yes --&gt;<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000100.html Sean Daly]<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000029.html Bill Bogstead]<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]<br /> # Luke Faraone<br /> | &lt;!-- no --&gt;<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000154.html Tabitha Roder]<br /> # Caryl Bigenho<br /> | &lt;!-- defer --&gt;<br /> # Samuel Klein<br /> | &lt;!-- invalid question --&gt;<br /> | &lt;!-- undecided --&gt;<br /> # Sebastian Dziallas<br /> # Faisal Khan<br /> # Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> # Daniel Drake<br /> |}<br /> <br /> =====Question 2=====<br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;border-collapse:collapse;&quot;<br /> |+ Question 2: &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot;<br /> |-<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| Yes<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| No<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| Defer<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| Invalid<br /> ! Undecided <br /> |-<br /> | &lt;!-- yes --&gt;<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]<br /> # Tabitha Roder<br /> # Caryl Bigenho<br /> # Luke Faraone<br /> | &lt;!-- no --&gt;<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]<br /> | &lt;!-- defer --&gt;<br /> | &lt;!-- invalid question --&gt;<br /> | &lt;!-- undecided --&gt;<br /> # Sebastian Dziallas<br /> # Martin Dengler<br /> # Bill Bogstad<br /> # Faisal Khan<br /> # Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> # Samuel Klein<br /> # Daniel Drake<br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> =====Question 3=====<br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; style=&quot;border-collapse:collapse;&quot;<br /> |+ Question 3: &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot;<br /> |-<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| Yes<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| No<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| Defer<br /> !width=&quot;20%&quot;| Invalid<br /> ! Undecided <br /> |-<br /> | &lt;!-- yes --&gt;<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000045.html Sean Daly]<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]<br /> # Tabitha Roder<br /> # Luke Faraone<br /> | &lt;!-- no --&gt;<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]<br /> # Caryl Bigenho<br /> | &lt;!-- defer --&gt; <br /> | &lt;!-- invalid question --&gt;<br /> | &lt;!-- undecided --&gt;<br /> # Bill Bogstad<br /> # Sebastian Dziallas<br /> # Faisal Khan<br /> # Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> # Samuel Klein<br /> # Daniel Drake<br /> |}</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Decision_panels/SOAS&diff=38893 2009-10-06T09:52:10Z

<p>Tabitha: /* Question 2 */</p> <hr /> <div>{{TOCright2|limit=2}}<br /> <br /> ==Origin==<br /> <br /> A 12-person Sugar-on-a-Stick (SoaS) decision panel was appointed by a [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-09-25#Decision_Panel|September 25, 2009]] Oversight Board decision.<br /> <br /> ==Mandate==<br /> <br /> {{quote|<br /> :&quot;Investigate the situation of how SoaS should be treated by Sugar Labs, and related questions, including answers to the following: <br /> :* &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot; <br /> :* &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot; <br /> :* &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot; <br /> :* Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question:&quot;Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?&quot; <br /> }}<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Members==<br /> <br /> * Sebastian Dziallas<br /> * Luke Faraone<br /> * Martin Dengler<br /> * Bill Bogstad<br /> * Faisal Khan<br /> * Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> * Samuel Klein<br /> * Sean Daly<br /> * Tabitha Roder<br /> * Caryl Bigenho<br /> * Daniel Drake<br /> * Abhishek Indoria <br /> <br /> <br /> == Procedures ==<br /> <br /> The [[:Decision panels#Procedures|Decision Panel procedures]] were adopted.<br /> <br /> Discussion took place on the [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archives/soas SoaS mailing list] with subject lines beginning with the text &quot;[DP]&quot;.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Report ==<br /> <br /> '''this is a draft'''<br /> <br /> ===Introduction===<br /> <br /> This constitutes the report of the SoaS decision panel (DP), [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008746.html convened by SLOB].<br /> <br /> The structure of this report is:<br /> <br /> # Introduction (this section)<br /> # Executive Summary<br /> # Mandate<br /> # Members<br /> # Report on Questions 1-3<br /> # Conclusion<br /> # Appendices<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Executive Summary===<br /> <br /> The Decision Panel was [[#Mandate|mandated]] to answer three questions. The Decision Panel's answers are below:<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 1: &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot;<br /> <br /> Answer: No, not now. SL is not now a full-service GNU/Linux distributor but 1) many contributors volunteer to help with individual tasks thereof; and 2) an official plan is part of a number of SugarLabs' members plans.<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 2: &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot;<br /> <br /> Answer: No. Sugar On a Stick, the Fedora-derived distribution, will be the endorsed distribution.<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 3: &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot; <br /> <br /> Answer: Yes.<br /> <br /> <br /> In addition, [[#Mandate|the mandate]] allows the Decision Panel to raise and answer any other question the DP deems required to provide an answer to the original question: &quot;Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?&quot; (Question 0).<br /> <br /> The Decision Panel has not raised any additional questions.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Mandate===<br /> <br /> {{quote|<br /> :&quot;Investigate the situation of how SoaS should be treated by Sugar Labs, and related questions, including answers to the following: <br /> :* &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot; <br /> :* &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot; <br /> :* &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot; <br /> :* Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question:&quot;Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?&quot; <br /> }}<br /> <br /> ===Members===<br /> <br /> * Sebastian Dziallas<br /> * Luke Faraone<br /> * Martin Dengler<br /> * Bill Bogstad<br /> * Faisal Khan<br /> * Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> * Samuel Klein<br /> * Sean Daly<br /> * Tabitha Roder<br /> * Caryl Bigenho<br /> * Daniel Drake<br /> * Abhishek Indoria <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Report on Questions 1-3===<br /> <br /> <br /> ====Question 1====<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 1: &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot;<br /> <br /> Answer: No, not now. SL is not now a full-service GNU/Linux distributor but 1) many contributors volunteer to help with individual tasks thereof; and 2) an official plan is part of a number of SugarLabs' members plans.<br /> <br /> <br /> ====Question 2====<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 2: &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot;<br /> <br /> Answer: No. Sugar On a Stick, the Fedora-derived distribution, will be the endorsed distribution.<br /> <br /> <br /> ====Question 3====<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 3: &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot; <br /> <br /> Answer: Yes.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Conclusion===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Appendicies===<br /> <br /> <br /> ====Votes / Recorded opinions====<br /> <br /> <br /> =====Question 1=====<br /> <br /> Yes:<br /> <br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000100.html Sean Daly]<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000029.html Bill Bogstead]<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]<br /> <br /> <br /> No:<br /> <br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]<br /> # Tabitha Roder<br /> <br /> Undecided:<br /> <br /> <br /> Unknown:<br /> <br /> # Sebastian Dziallas<br /> # Luke Faraone<br /> # Faisal Khan<br /> # Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> # Samuel Klein<br /> # Caryl Bigenho<br /> # Daniel Drake<br /> <br /> =====Question 2=====<br /> <br /> <br /> Yes:<br /> <br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]<br /> # Tabitha Roder<br /> <br /> No:<br /> <br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Undecided:<br /> <br /> <br /> Unknown:<br /> # Sebastian Dziallas<br /> # Luke Faraone<br /> # Martin Dengler<br /> # Bill Bogstad<br /> # Faisal Khan<br /> # Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> # Samuel Klein<br /> # Caryl Bigenho<br /> # Daniel Drake<br /> <br /> =====Question 3=====<br /> <br /> Yes:<br /> <br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000045.html Sean Daly]<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]<br /> # Tabitha Roder <br /> <br /> No:<br /> <br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]<br /> <br /> Undecided:<br /> # Bill Bogstad (dependent on answer to question #1)<br /> <br /> <br /> Unknown:<br /> # Sebastian Dziallas<br /> # Luke Faraone<br /> # Faisal Khan<br /> # Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> # Samuel Klein<br /> <br /> # Caryl Bigenho<br /> # Daniel Drake<br /> # Abhishek Indoria<br /> <br /> ====Further ideas====<br /> <br /> =====Potential naming conventions=====<br /> * Sugar4CD/PC/F11 (Sugar, version 4, made for liveCD, runs on PCs, Fedora11 based) - example from Caryl Bigenho &lt;cbigenho@hotmail.com&gt;<br /> There has been much talk of whether we should name with different foods and animals. Types of sugar (sucrose, glucose) has been suggested due to its link to sustainability of life. <br /> There still seems to be much sense in keeping it simple with SoaS keeping one name with a version release number and corresponding release name.<br /> <br /> <br /> [[category:decision panels]]</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Decision_panels/SOAS&diff=38892 2009-10-06T09:45:28Z

<p>Tabitha: /* Question 1 */</p> <hr /> <div>{{TOCright2|limit=2}}<br /> <br /> ==Origin==<br /> <br /> A 12-person Sugar-on-a-Stick (SoaS) decision panel was appointed by a [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-09-25#Decision_Panel|September 25, 2009]] Oversight Board decision.<br /> <br /> ==Mandate==<br /> <br /> {{quote|<br /> :&quot;Investigate the situation of how SoaS should be treated by Sugar Labs, and related questions, including answers to the following: <br /> :* &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot; <br /> :* &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot; <br /> :* &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot; <br /> :* Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question:&quot;Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?&quot; <br /> }}<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Members==<br /> <br /> * Sebastian Dziallas<br /> * Luke Faraone<br /> * Martin Dengler<br /> * Bill Bogstad<br /> * Faisal Khan<br /> * Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> * Samuel Klein<br /> * Sean Daly<br /> * Tabitha Roder<br /> * Caryl Bigenho<br /> * Daniel Drake<br /> * Abhishek Indoria <br /> <br /> <br /> == Procedures ==<br /> <br /> The [[:Decision panels#Procedures|Decision Panel procedures]] were adopted.<br /> <br /> Discussion took place on the [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archives/soas SoaS mailing list] with subject lines beginning with the text &quot;[DP]&quot;.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Report ==<br /> <br /> '''this is a draft'''<br /> <br /> ===Introduction===<br /> <br /> This constitutes the report of the SoaS decision panel (DP), [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008746.html convened by SLOB].<br /> <br /> The structure of this report is:<br /> <br /> # Introduction (this section)<br /> # Executive Summary<br /> # Mandate<br /> # Members<br /> # Report on Questions 1-3<br /> # Conclusion<br /> # Appendices<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Executive Summary===<br /> <br /> The Decision Panel was [[#Mandate|mandated]] to answer three questions. The Decision Panel's answers are below:<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 1: &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot;<br /> <br /> Answer: No, not now. SL is not now a full-service GNU/Linux distributor but 1) many contributors volunteer to help with individual tasks thereof; and 2) an official plan is part of a number of SugarLabs' members plans.<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 2: &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot;<br /> <br /> Answer: No. Sugar On a Stick, the Fedora-derived distribution, will be the endorsed distribution.<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 3: &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot; <br /> <br /> Answer: Yes.<br /> <br /> <br /> In addition, [[#Mandate|the mandate]] allows the Decision Panel to raise and answer any other question the DP deems required to provide an answer to the original question: &quot;Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?&quot; (Question 0).<br /> <br /> The Decision Panel has not raised any additional questions.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Mandate===<br /> <br /> {{quote|<br /> :&quot;Investigate the situation of how SoaS should be treated by Sugar Labs, and related questions, including answers to the following: <br /> :* &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot; <br /> :* &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot; <br /> :* &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot; <br /> :* Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question:&quot;Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?&quot; <br /> }}<br /> <br /> ===Members===<br /> <br /> * Sebastian Dziallas<br /> * Luke Faraone<br /> * Martin Dengler<br /> * Bill Bogstad<br /> * Faisal Khan<br /> * Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> * Samuel Klein<br /> * Sean Daly<br /> * Tabitha Roder<br /> * Caryl Bigenho<br /> * Daniel Drake<br /> * Abhishek Indoria <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Report on Questions 1-3===<br /> <br /> <br /> ====Question 1====<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 1: &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot;<br /> <br /> Answer: No, not now. SL is not now a full-service GNU/Linux distributor but 1) many contributors volunteer to help with individual tasks thereof; and 2) an official plan is part of a number of SugarLabs' members plans.<br /> <br /> <br /> ====Question 2====<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 2: &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot;<br /> <br /> Answer: No. Sugar On a Stick, the Fedora-derived distribution, will be the endorsed distribution.<br /> <br /> <br /> ====Question 3====<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 3: &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot; <br /> <br /> Answer: Yes.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Conclusion===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Appendicies===<br /> <br /> <br /> ====Votes / Recorded opinions====<br /> <br /> <br /> =====Question 1=====<br /> <br /> Yes:<br /> <br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000100.html Sean Daly]<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000029.html Bill Bogstead]<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]<br /> <br /> <br /> No:<br /> <br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]<br /> # Tabitha Roder<br /> <br /> Undecided:<br /> <br /> <br /> Unknown:<br /> <br /> # Sebastian Dziallas<br /> # Luke Faraone<br /> # Faisal Khan<br /> # Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> # Samuel Klein<br /> # Caryl Bigenho<br /> # Daniel Drake<br /> <br /> =====Question 2=====<br /> <br /> <br /> Yes:<br /> <br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]<br /> <br /> <br /> No:<br /> <br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]<br /> # Tabitha Roder<br /> <br /> <br /> Undecided:<br /> <br /> <br /> Unknown:<br /> # Sebastian Dziallas<br /> # Luke Faraone<br /> # Martin Dengler<br /> # Bill Bogstad<br /> # Faisal Khan<br /> # Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> # Samuel Klein<br /> # Caryl Bigenho<br /> # Daniel Drake<br /> <br /> =====Question 3=====<br /> <br /> Yes:<br /> <br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000045.html Sean Daly]<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]<br /> # Tabitha Roder <br /> <br /> No:<br /> <br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]<br /> <br /> Undecided:<br /> # Bill Bogstad (dependent on answer to question #1)<br /> <br /> <br /> Unknown:<br /> # Sebastian Dziallas<br /> # Luke Faraone<br /> # Faisal Khan<br /> # Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> # Samuel Klein<br /> <br /> # Caryl Bigenho<br /> # Daniel Drake<br /> # Abhishek Indoria<br /> <br /> ====Further ideas====<br /> <br /> =====Potential naming conventions=====<br /> * Sugar4CD/PC/F11 (Sugar, version 4, made for liveCD, runs on PCs, Fedora11 based) - example from Caryl Bigenho &lt;cbigenho@hotmail.com&gt;<br /> There has been much talk of whether we should name with different foods and animals. Types of sugar (sucrose, glucose) has been suggested due to its link to sustainability of life. <br /> There still seems to be much sense in keeping it simple with SoaS keeping one name with a version release number and corresponding release name.<br /> <br /> <br /> [[category:decision panels]]</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Decision_panels/SOAS&diff=38891 2009-10-06T09:45:06Z

<p>Tabitha: /* Question 1 */</p> <hr /> <div>{{TOCright2|limit=2}}<br /> <br /> ==Origin==<br /> <br /> A 12-person Sugar-on-a-Stick (SoaS) decision panel was appointed by a [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-09-25#Decision_Panel|September 25, 2009]] Oversight Board decision.<br /> <br /> ==Mandate==<br /> <br /> {{quote|<br /> :&quot;Investigate the situation of how SoaS should be treated by Sugar Labs, and related questions, including answers to the following: <br /> :* &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot; <br /> :* &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot; <br /> :* &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot; <br /> :* Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question:&quot;Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?&quot; <br /> }}<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Members==<br /> <br /> * Sebastian Dziallas<br /> * Luke Faraone<br /> * Martin Dengler<br /> * Bill Bogstad<br /> * Faisal Khan<br /> * Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> * Samuel Klein<br /> * Sean Daly<br /> * Tabitha Roder<br /> * Caryl Bigenho<br /> * Daniel Drake<br /> * Abhishek Indoria <br /> <br /> <br /> == Procedures ==<br /> <br /> The [[:Decision panels#Procedures|Decision Panel procedures]] were adopted.<br /> <br /> Discussion took place on the [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archives/soas SoaS mailing list] with subject lines beginning with the text &quot;[DP]&quot;.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Report ==<br /> <br /> '''this is a draft'''<br /> <br /> ===Introduction===<br /> <br /> This constitutes the report of the SoaS decision panel (DP), [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008746.html convened by SLOB].<br /> <br /> The structure of this report is:<br /> <br /> # Introduction (this section)<br /> # Executive Summary<br /> # Mandate<br /> # Members<br /> # Report on Questions 1-3<br /> # Conclusion<br /> # Appendices<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Executive Summary===<br /> <br /> The Decision Panel was [[#Mandate|mandated]] to answer three questions. The Decision Panel's answers are below:<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 1: &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot;<br /> <br /> Answer: No, not now. SL is not now a full-service GNU/Linux distributor but 1) many contributors volunteer to help with individual tasks thereof; and 2) an official plan is part of a number of SugarLabs' members plans.<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 2: &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot;<br /> <br /> Answer: No. Sugar On a Stick, the Fedora-derived distribution, will be the endorsed distribution.<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 3: &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot; <br /> <br /> Answer: Yes.<br /> <br /> <br /> In addition, [[#Mandate|the mandate]] allows the Decision Panel to raise and answer any other question the DP deems required to provide an answer to the original question: &quot;Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?&quot; (Question 0).<br /> <br /> The Decision Panel has not raised any additional questions.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Mandate===<br /> <br /> {{quote|<br /> :&quot;Investigate the situation of how SoaS should be treated by Sugar Labs, and related questions, including answers to the following: <br /> :* &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot; <br /> :* &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot; <br /> :* &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot; <br /> :* Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question:&quot;Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?&quot; <br /> }}<br /> <br /> ===Members===<br /> <br /> * Sebastian Dziallas<br /> * Luke Faraone<br /> * Martin Dengler<br /> * Bill Bogstad<br /> * Faisal Khan<br /> * Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> * Samuel Klein<br /> * Sean Daly<br /> * Tabitha Roder<br /> * Caryl Bigenho<br /> * Daniel Drake<br /> * Abhishek Indoria <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Report on Questions 1-3===<br /> <br /> <br /> ====Question 1====<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 1: &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot;<br /> <br /> Answer: No, not now. SL is not now a full-service GNU/Linux distributor but 1) many contributors volunteer to help with individual tasks thereof; and 2) an official plan is part of a number of SugarLabs' members plans.<br /> <br /> <br /> ====Question 2====<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 2: &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot;<br /> <br /> Answer: No. Sugar On a Stick, the Fedora-derived distribution, will be the endorsed distribution.<br /> <br /> <br /> ====Question 3====<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 3: &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot; <br /> <br /> Answer: Yes.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Conclusion===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Appendicies===<br /> <br /> <br /> ====Votes / Recorded opinions====<br /> <br /> <br /> =====Question 1=====<br /> <br /> Yes:<br /> <br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000100.html Sean Daly]<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000029.html Bill Bogstead]<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]<br /> <br /> <br /> No:<br /> <br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]<br /> # Tabitha Roder<br /> <br /> Undecided:<br /> <br /> <br /> Unknown:<br /> <br /> # Sebastian Dziallas<br /> # Luke Faraone<br /> # Faisal Khan<br /> # Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> # Samuel Klein<br /> <br /> # Caryl Bigenho<br /> # Daniel Drake<br /> <br /> =====Question 2=====<br /> <br /> <br /> Yes:<br /> <br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]<br /> <br /> <br /> No:<br /> <br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]<br /> # Tabitha Roder<br /> <br /> <br /> Undecided:<br /> <br /> <br /> Unknown:<br /> # Sebastian Dziallas<br /> # Luke Faraone<br /> # Martin Dengler<br /> # Bill Bogstad<br /> # Faisal Khan<br /> # Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> # Samuel Klein<br /> # Caryl Bigenho<br /> # Daniel Drake<br /> <br /> =====Question 3=====<br /> <br /> Yes:<br /> <br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000045.html Sean Daly]<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]<br /> # Tabitha Roder <br /> <br /> No:<br /> <br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]<br /> <br /> Undecided:<br /> # Bill Bogstad (dependent on answer to question #1)<br /> <br /> <br /> Unknown:<br /> # Sebastian Dziallas<br /> # Luke Faraone<br /> # Faisal Khan<br /> # Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> # Samuel Klein<br /> <br /> # Caryl Bigenho<br /> # Daniel Drake<br /> # Abhishek Indoria<br /> <br /> ====Further ideas====<br /> <br /> =====Potential naming conventions=====<br /> * Sugar4CD/PC/F11 (Sugar, version 4, made for liveCD, runs on PCs, Fedora11 based) - example from Caryl Bigenho &lt;cbigenho@hotmail.com&gt;<br /> There has been much talk of whether we should name with different foods and animals. Types of sugar (sucrose, glucose) has been suggested due to its link to sustainability of life. <br /> There still seems to be much sense in keeping it simple with SoaS keeping one name with a version release number and corresponding release name.<br /> <br /> <br /> [[category:decision panels]]</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Decision_panels/SOAS&diff=38890 2009-10-06T09:42:09Z

<p>Tabitha: /* Question 3 */</p> <hr /> <div>{{TOCright2|limit=2}}<br /> <br /> ==Origin==<br /> <br /> A 12-person Sugar-on-a-Stick (SoaS) decision panel was appointed by a [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-09-25#Decision_Panel|September 25, 2009]] Oversight Board decision.<br /> <br /> ==Mandate==<br /> <br /> {{quote|<br /> :&quot;Investigate the situation of how SoaS should be treated by Sugar Labs, and related questions, including answers to the following: <br /> :* &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot; <br /> :* &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot; <br /> :* &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot; <br /> :* Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question:&quot;Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?&quot; <br /> }}<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Members==<br /> <br /> * Sebastian Dziallas<br /> * Luke Faraone<br /> * Martin Dengler<br /> * Bill Bogstad<br /> * Faisal Khan<br /> * Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> * Samuel Klein<br /> * Sean Daly<br /> * Tabitha Roder<br /> * Caryl Bigenho<br /> * Daniel Drake<br /> * Abhishek Indoria <br /> <br /> <br /> == Procedures ==<br /> <br /> The [[:Decision panels#Procedures|Decision Panel procedures]] were adopted.<br /> <br /> Discussion took place on the [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archives/soas SoaS mailing list] with subject lines beginning with the text &quot;[DP]&quot;.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Report ==<br /> <br /> '''this is a draft'''<br /> <br /> ===Introduction===<br /> <br /> This constitutes the report of the SoaS decision panel (DP), [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008746.html convened by SLOB].<br /> <br /> The structure of this report is:<br /> <br /> # Introduction (this section)<br /> # Executive Summary<br /> # Mandate<br /> # Members<br /> # Report on Questions 1-3<br /> # Conclusion<br /> # Appendices<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Executive Summary===<br /> <br /> The Decision Panel was [[#Mandate|mandated]] to answer three questions. The Decision Panel's answers are below:<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 1: &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot;<br /> <br /> Answer: No, not now. SL is not now a full-service GNU/Linux distributor but 1) many contributors volunteer to help with individual tasks thereof; and 2) an official plan is part of a number of SugarLabs' members plans.<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 2: &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot;<br /> <br /> Answer: No. Sugar On a Stick, the Fedora-derived distribution, will be the endorsed distribution.<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 3: &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot; <br /> <br /> Answer: Yes.<br /> <br /> <br /> In addition, [[#Mandate|the mandate]] allows the Decision Panel to raise and answer any other question the DP deems required to provide an answer to the original question: &quot;Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?&quot; (Question 0).<br /> <br /> The Decision Panel has not raised any additional questions.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Mandate===<br /> <br /> {{quote|<br /> :&quot;Investigate the situation of how SoaS should be treated by Sugar Labs, and related questions, including answers to the following: <br /> :* &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot; <br /> :* &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot; <br /> :* &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot; <br /> :* Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question:&quot;Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?&quot; <br /> }}<br /> <br /> ===Members===<br /> <br /> * Sebastian Dziallas<br /> * Luke Faraone<br /> * Martin Dengler<br /> * Bill Bogstad<br /> * Faisal Khan<br /> * Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> * Samuel Klein<br /> * Sean Daly<br /> * Tabitha Roder<br /> * Caryl Bigenho<br /> * Daniel Drake<br /> * Abhishek Indoria <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Report on Questions 1-3===<br /> <br /> <br /> ====Question 1====<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 1: &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot;<br /> <br /> Answer: No, not now. SL is not now a full-service GNU/Linux distributor but 1) many contributors volunteer to help with individual tasks thereof; and 2) an official plan is part of a number of SugarLabs' members plans.<br /> <br /> <br /> ====Question 2====<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 2: &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot;<br /> <br /> Answer: No. Sugar On a Stick, the Fedora-derived distribution, will be the endorsed distribution.<br /> <br /> <br /> ====Question 3====<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 3: &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot; <br /> <br /> Answer: Yes.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Conclusion===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Appendicies===<br /> <br /> <br /> ====Votes / Recorded opinions====<br /> <br /> <br /> =====Question 1=====<br /> <br /> Yes:<br /> <br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000100.html Sean Daly]<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000029.html Bill Bogstead]<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]<br /> <br /> <br /> No:<br /> <br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]<br /> <br /> <br /> Undecided:<br /> <br /> <br /> Unknown:<br /> <br /> # Sebastian Dziallas<br /> # Luke Faraone<br /> # Faisal Khan<br /> # Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> # Samuel Klein<br /> # Tabitha Roder<br /> # Caryl Bigenho<br /> # Daniel Drake<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> =====Question 2=====<br /> <br /> <br /> Yes:<br /> <br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]<br /> <br /> <br /> No:<br /> <br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]<br /> # Tabitha Roder<br /> <br /> <br /> Undecided:<br /> <br /> <br /> Unknown:<br /> # Sebastian Dziallas<br /> # Luke Faraone<br /> # Martin Dengler<br /> # Bill Bogstad<br /> # Faisal Khan<br /> # Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> # Samuel Klein<br /> # Caryl Bigenho<br /> # Daniel Drake<br /> <br /> =====Question 3=====<br /> <br /> Yes:<br /> <br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000045.html Sean Daly]<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]<br /> # Tabitha Roder <br /> <br /> No:<br /> <br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]<br /> <br /> Undecided:<br /> # Bill Bogstad (dependent on answer to question #1)<br /> <br /> <br /> Unknown:<br /> # Sebastian Dziallas<br /> # Luke Faraone<br /> # Faisal Khan<br /> # Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> # Samuel Klein<br /> <br /> # Caryl Bigenho<br /> # Daniel Drake<br /> # Abhishek Indoria<br /> <br /> ====Further ideas====<br /> <br /> =====Potential naming conventions=====<br /> * Sugar4CD/PC/F11 (Sugar, version 4, made for liveCD, runs on PCs, Fedora11 based) - example from Caryl Bigenho &lt;cbigenho@hotmail.com&gt;<br /> There has been much talk of whether we should name with different foods and animals. Types of sugar (sucrose, glucose) has been suggested due to its link to sustainability of life. <br /> There still seems to be much sense in keeping it simple with SoaS keeping one name with a version release number and corresponding release name.<br /> <br /> <br /> [[category:decision panels]]</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Decision_panels/SOAS&diff=38889 2009-10-06T09:41:01Z

<p>Tabitha: /* Question 2 */</p> <hr /> <div>{{TOCright2|limit=2}}<br /> <br /> ==Origin==<br /> <br /> A 12-person Sugar-on-a-Stick (SoaS) decision panel was appointed by a [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-09-25#Decision_Panel|September 25, 2009]] Oversight Board decision.<br /> <br /> ==Mandate==<br /> <br /> {{quote|<br /> :&quot;Investigate the situation of how SoaS should be treated by Sugar Labs, and related questions, including answers to the following: <br /> :* &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot; <br /> :* &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot; <br /> :* &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot; <br /> :* Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question:&quot;Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?&quot; <br /> }}<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Members==<br /> <br /> * Sebastian Dziallas<br /> * Luke Faraone<br /> * Martin Dengler<br /> * Bill Bogstad<br /> * Faisal Khan<br /> * Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> * Samuel Klein<br /> * Sean Daly<br /> * Tabitha Roder<br /> * Caryl Bigenho<br /> * Daniel Drake<br /> * Abhishek Indoria <br /> <br /> <br /> == Procedures ==<br /> <br /> The [[:Decision panels#Procedures|Decision Panel procedures]] were adopted.<br /> <br /> Discussion took place on the [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archives/soas SoaS mailing list] with subject lines beginning with the text &quot;[DP]&quot;.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Report ==<br /> <br /> '''this is a draft'''<br /> <br /> ===Introduction===<br /> <br /> This constitutes the report of the SoaS decision panel (DP), [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008746.html convened by SLOB].<br /> <br /> The structure of this report is:<br /> <br /> # Introduction (this section)<br /> # Executive Summary<br /> # Mandate<br /> # Members<br /> # Report on Questions 1-3<br /> # Conclusion<br /> # Appendices<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Executive Summary===<br /> <br /> The Decision Panel was [[#Mandate|mandated]] to answer three questions. The Decision Panel's answers are below:<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 1: &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot;<br /> <br /> Answer: No, not now. SL is not now a full-service GNU/Linux distributor but 1) many contributors volunteer to help with individual tasks thereof; and 2) an official plan is part of a number of SugarLabs' members plans.<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 2: &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot;<br /> <br /> Answer: No. Sugar On a Stick, the Fedora-derived distribution, will be the endorsed distribution.<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 3: &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot; <br /> <br /> Answer: Yes.<br /> <br /> <br /> In addition, [[#Mandate|the mandate]] allows the Decision Panel to raise and answer any other question the DP deems required to provide an answer to the original question: &quot;Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?&quot; (Question 0).<br /> <br /> The Decision Panel has not raised any additional questions.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Mandate===<br /> <br /> {{quote|<br /> :&quot;Investigate the situation of how SoaS should be treated by Sugar Labs, and related questions, including answers to the following: <br /> :* &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot; <br /> :* &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot; <br /> :* &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot; <br /> :* Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question:&quot;Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?&quot; <br /> }}<br /> <br /> ===Members===<br /> <br /> * Sebastian Dziallas<br /> * Luke Faraone<br /> * Martin Dengler<br /> * Bill Bogstad<br /> * Faisal Khan<br /> * Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> * Samuel Klein<br /> * Sean Daly<br /> * Tabitha Roder<br /> * Caryl Bigenho<br /> * Daniel Drake<br /> * Abhishek Indoria <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Report on Questions 1-3===<br /> <br /> <br /> ====Question 1====<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 1: &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot;<br /> <br /> Answer: No, not now. SL is not now a full-service GNU/Linux distributor but 1) many contributors volunteer to help with individual tasks thereof; and 2) an official plan is part of a number of SugarLabs' members plans.<br /> <br /> <br /> ====Question 2====<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 2: &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot;<br /> <br /> Answer: No. Sugar On a Stick, the Fedora-derived distribution, will be the endorsed distribution.<br /> <br /> <br /> ====Question 3====<br /> <br /> <br /> Question 3: &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot; <br /> <br /> Answer: Yes.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Conclusion===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Appendicies===<br /> <br /> <br /> ====Votes / Recorded opinions====<br /> <br /> <br /> =====Question 1=====<br /> <br /> Yes:<br /> <br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000100.html Sean Daly]<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000029.html Bill Bogstead]<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]<br /> <br /> <br /> No:<br /> <br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]<br /> <br /> <br /> Undecided:<br /> <br /> <br /> Unknown:<br /> <br /> # Sebastian Dziallas<br /> # Luke Faraone<br /> # Faisal Khan<br /> # Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> # Samuel Klein<br /> # Tabitha Roder<br /> # Caryl Bigenho<br /> # Daniel Drake<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> =====Question 2=====<br /> <br /> <br /> Yes:<br /> <br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]<br /> <br /> <br /> No:<br /> <br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]<br /> # Tabitha Roder<br /> <br /> <br /> Undecided:<br /> <br /> <br /> Unknown:<br /> # Sebastian Dziallas<br /> # Luke Faraone<br /> # Martin Dengler<br /> # Bill Bogstad<br /> # Faisal Khan<br /> # Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> # Samuel Klein<br /> # Caryl Bigenho<br /> # Daniel Drake<br /> <br /> =====Question 3=====<br /> <br /> Yes:<br /> <br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000045.html Sean Daly]<br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]<br /> <br /> <br /> No:<br /> <br /> # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]<br /> <br /> Undecided:<br /> # Bill Bogstad (dependent on answer to question #1)<br /> <br /> <br /> Unknown:<br /> # Sebastian Dziallas<br /> # Luke Faraone<br /> # Faisal Khan<br /> # Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> # Samuel Klein<br /> # Tabitha Roder<br /> # Caryl Bigenho<br /> # Daniel Drake<br /> # Abhishek Indoria <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Further ideas====<br /> <br /> =====Potential naming conventions=====<br /> * Sugar4CD/PC/F11 (Sugar, version 4, made for liveCD, runs on PCs, Fedora11 based) - example from Caryl Bigenho &lt;cbigenho@hotmail.com&gt;<br /> There has been much talk of whether we should name with different foods and animals. Types of sugar (sucrose, glucose) has been suggested due to its link to sustainability of life. <br /> There still seems to be much sense in keeping it simple with SoaS keeping one name with a version release number and corresponding release name.<br /> <br /> <br /> [[category:decision panels]]</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Marketing_Team/Events&diff=38759 2009-10-03T22:33:38Z

<p>Tabitha: /* Upcoming Events */</p> <hr /> <div>&lt;noinclude&gt;{{GoogleTrans-en}}<br /> {{TeamHeader|Marketing Team}}&lt;/noinclude&gt;<br /> {{TOCright}}<br /> == Add an Event ==<br /> <br /> Would you like to represent Sugar Labs at an event near you? Follow this simple process.<br /> <br /> # Create a new page on the wiki, using [[User:Gdk/Events/PyCon2009]] as an example.<br /> # Link to the event in the [[#Upcoming Events]] section, below.<br /> # Send an email to '''events at sugarlabs dot org''' to have the event added to the official Google calendar of events.<br /> #: ''mail.sugarlabs.org'' account holders may follow [[Sugar_Labs/Events/Instructions | these instructions]].<br /> <br /> == Events: Google Calendar ==<br /> <br /> Sugar [[Sugar Labs/Events | community events]] are posted in a public calendar within the Google Calendar system. The calendar is available in a variety of formats: &lt;span class=&quot;plainlinks&quot;&gt; [http://www.google.com/calendar/feeds/6n9a99dr5knag9tp0obc0rncug%40group.calendar.google.com/public/basic {{filepath:XML.gif}}] [http://www.google.com/calendar/ical/h9cfuk10894em7a8moemquusmg%40group.calendar.google.com/public/basic.ics {{filepath:ICal.gif}}] [http://www.google.com/calendar/embed?src=6n9a99dr5knag9tp0obc0rncug%40group.calendar.google.com&amp;ctz=America/New_York {{filepath:HTML.gif}}].&lt;/span&gt;<br /> <br /> == Upcoming Events ==<br /> <br /> Sugar Labs has committed to having a presence at the following events.<br /> <br /> {| class=&quot;schedule sortable&quot; border=&quot;1&quot;<br /> ! Date !! Event !! Location !! Owner !! Details<br /> |-<br /> |2010-01-18 – 2010-01-23 || [http://www.lca2010.org.nz/ LCA2010 website] || Wellington, NZ || [[User:Tabitha| Tabitha Roder]] || [[User:Tabitha/Events/LCA2010 | LCA2010]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2010-04-03 – 2010-04-17 || [http://www.sciencefestival.co.uk/ Science Fest 2010] || Edinburgh, UK || [[User:Garycmartin| Gary C Martin]] || [[Marketing Team/Events/ScienceFest2010|Science Fest 2010]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2009-11-07 – 2009-11-12 || [http://www.sfscon.it/2009 SFScon 2009] || Bolzano, Italy || || [[Marketing Team/Events/Sugarcamp_Bolzano_2009 |SugarCamp Bolzano 2009]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2009-10-27 – 2009-10-29 || [http://www.masscue.org/ MassCUE] || near Boston, MA, USA || || [[Marketing Team/Events/MassCUE2009|MassCUE 2009]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2009-06-28 – 2009-07-01 || [http://center.uoregon.edu/ISTE/NECC2009/ NECC 2009] || Washington DC, USA || || [[Marketing Team/Events/NECC2009|NECC 2009]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2009-06-24 – 2009-06-27 || [http://www.linuxtag.org/2009/en.html LinuxTag 2009] || Berlin, Germany || [[User: Erikos| Simon Schampijer]] || [[Marketing Team/Events/LinuxTag2009|LinuxTag 2009]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2009-03-25 – 2009-04-02 || [http://us.pycon.org/2009/about/ PyCon 2009] || Chicago, IL, USA || [[User:Gdk | Greg DeKoenigsberg]] || [[User:Gdk/Events/PyCon2009|PyCon 2009]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2009-02-07 – 2009-02-08 || [http://fosdem.org FOSDEM 2009] || Brussels, Belgium || [[User: ChristophD| Christoph Derndorfer]] || [[Marketing Team/Events/FOSDEM_2009|FOSDEM 2009]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2009-01-19 – 2009-01-24 || [http://linux.conf.au/ linux.conf.au 09] || Hobart, Tasmania || [[User:Walter | Walter Bender]] || [[User:Walter/Events/Linux.conf.au09|LCA 09]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2008-12-02 – 2008-12-05 || [http://osdc.com.au/2008/ Open Source Developers Conference (OSDC)] || Sydney, Australia || [[User:joel | Joel Stanley]] || [[User:Joel/Events/OSDC2008 | OSDC 2008]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2008-11-24 – 2008-11-26 || [http://www.vitta.org.au/conferenceinfo Victorian IT Teachers Association (VITTA) conference] || Melbourne, Australia || [[User:joel | Joel Stanley]] || [[User:Joel/Events/VITTA2008 | VITTA 2008]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2008-11-13 – 2008-11-14 || [http://www.sfscon.it/2008/ South Tyrol Free Software conference (SFScon)] || Bolzano, Italy || [[User:Walter | Walter Bender]] || [[User:Walter/Events/SFScon08|SFScon 08]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2008-10-27 – 2008-10-30 || [http://www.cmp-egevents.com/web/escb ESC 2008] || Boston, MA, USA || [[User:Bernie | Bernie Innocenti]] || [https://www.cmpevents.com/ESCe08/a.asp?option=C&amp;V=11&amp;SessID=8164 Constructionist learning with Sugar and the Beagle Board]<br /> |-<br /> | 2008-10-26 – 2008-10-28 || [http://www.sarasotadesignsummit.com Sarasota International Design Summit] || Sarasota, FL, USA || [[User:Walter | Walter Bender]] || [[User:Walter/Events/Sarasota-Design-Summit|Sarasota Design Summit]]<br /> |}<br /> <br /> == Subpages ==<br /> {{Special:PrefixIndex/{{PAGENAMEE}}/}}<br /> <br /> [[Category:Event]]</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Marketing_Team/Events&diff=38758 2009-10-03T22:32:27Z

<p>Tabitha: /* Upcoming Events */</p> <hr /> <div>&lt;noinclude&gt;{{GoogleTrans-en}}<br /> {{TeamHeader|Marketing Team}}&lt;/noinclude&gt;<br /> {{TOCright}}<br /> == Add an Event ==<br /> <br /> Would you like to represent Sugar Labs at an event near you? Follow this simple process.<br /> <br /> # Create a new page on the wiki, using [[User:Gdk/Events/PyCon2009]] as an example.<br /> # Link to the event in the [[#Upcoming Events]] section, below.<br /> # Send an email to '''events at sugarlabs dot org''' to have the event added to the official Google calendar of events.<br /> #: ''mail.sugarlabs.org'' account holders may follow [[Sugar_Labs/Events/Instructions | these instructions]].<br /> <br /> == Events: Google Calendar ==<br /> <br /> Sugar [[Sugar Labs/Events | community events]] are posted in a public calendar within the Google Calendar system. The calendar is available in a variety of formats: &lt;span class=&quot;plainlinks&quot;&gt; [http://www.google.com/calendar/feeds/6n9a99dr5knag9tp0obc0rncug%40group.calendar.google.com/public/basic {{filepath:XML.gif}}] [http://www.google.com/calendar/ical/h9cfuk10894em7a8moemquusmg%40group.calendar.google.com/public/basic.ics {{filepath:ICal.gif}}] [http://www.google.com/calendar/embed?src=6n9a99dr5knag9tp0obc0rncug%40group.calendar.google.com&amp;ctz=America/New_York {{filepath:HTML.gif}}].&lt;/span&gt;<br /> <br /> == Upcoming Events ==<br /> <br /> Sugar Labs has committed to having a presence at the following events.<br /> <br /> {| class=&quot;schedule sortable&quot; border=&quot;1&quot;<br /> ! Date !! Event !! Location !! Owner !! Details<br /> |-<br /> | 2010-04-03 – 2010-04-17 || [http://www.lca2010.org.nz/ LCA2010 website] || Wellington, NZ || [[User:Tabitha| Tabitha Roder]] || [[User:Tabitha/Events/LCA2010 | LCA2010]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2010-01-18 – 2010-01-23 || [http://www.sciencefestival.co.uk/ Science Fest 2010] || Edinburgh, UK || [[User:Garycmartin| Gary C Martin]] || [[Marketing Team/Events/ScienceFest2010|Science Fest 2010]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2009-11-07 – 2009-11-12 || [http://www.sfscon.it/2009 SFScon 2009] || Bolzano, Italy || || [[Marketing Team/Events/Sugarcamp_Bolzano_2009 |SugarCamp Bolzano 2009]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2009-10-27 – 2009-10-29 || [http://www.masscue.org/ MassCUE] || near Boston, MA, USA || || [[Marketing Team/Events/MassCUE2009|MassCUE 2009]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2009-06-28 – 2009-07-01 || [http://center.uoregon.edu/ISTE/NECC2009/ NECC 2009] || Washington DC, USA || || [[Marketing Team/Events/NECC2009|NECC 2009]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2009-06-24 – 2009-06-27 || [http://www.linuxtag.org/2009/en.html LinuxTag 2009] || Berlin, Germany || [[User: Erikos| Simon Schampijer]] || [[Marketing Team/Events/LinuxTag2009|LinuxTag 2009]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2009-03-25 – 2009-04-02 || [http://us.pycon.org/2009/about/ PyCon 2009] || Chicago, IL, USA || [[User:Gdk | Greg DeKoenigsberg]] || [[User:Gdk/Events/PyCon2009|PyCon 2009]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2009-02-07 – 2009-02-08 || [http://fosdem.org FOSDEM 2009] || Brussels, Belgium || [[User: ChristophD| Christoph Derndorfer]] || [[Marketing Team/Events/FOSDEM_2009|FOSDEM 2009]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2009-01-19 – 2009-01-24 || [http://linux.conf.au/ linux.conf.au 09] || Hobart, Tasmania || [[User:Walter | Walter Bender]] || [[User:Walter/Events/Linux.conf.au09|LCA 09]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2008-12-02 – 2008-12-05 || [http://osdc.com.au/2008/ Open Source Developers Conference (OSDC)] || Sydney, Australia || [[User:joel | Joel Stanley]] || [[User:Joel/Events/OSDC2008 | OSDC 2008]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2008-11-24 – 2008-11-26 || [http://www.vitta.org.au/conferenceinfo Victorian IT Teachers Association (VITTA) conference] || Melbourne, Australia || [[User:joel | Joel Stanley]] || [[User:Joel/Events/VITTA2008 | VITTA 2008]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2008-11-13 – 2008-11-14 || [http://www.sfscon.it/2008/ South Tyrol Free Software conference (SFScon)] || Bolzano, Italy || [[User:Walter | Walter Bender]] || [[User:Walter/Events/SFScon08|SFScon 08]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2008-10-27 – 2008-10-30 || [http://www.cmp-egevents.com/web/escb ESC 2008] || Boston, MA, USA || [[User:Bernie | Bernie Innocenti]] || [https://www.cmpevents.com/ESCe08/a.asp?option=C&amp;V=11&amp;SessID=8164 Constructionist learning with Sugar and the Beagle Board]<br /> |-<br /> | 2008-10-26 – 2008-10-28 || [http://www.sarasotadesignsummit.com Sarasota International Design Summit] || Sarasota, FL, USA || [[User:Walter | Walter Bender]] || [[User:Walter/Events/Sarasota-Design-Summit|Sarasota Design Summit]]<br /> |}<br /> <br /> == Subpages ==<br /> {{Special:PrefixIndex/{{PAGENAMEE}}/}}<br /> <br /> [[Category:Event]]</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Marketing_Team/Events&diff=38757 2009-10-03T22:31:16Z

<p>Tabitha: /* Upcoming Events */</p> <hr /> <div>&lt;noinclude&gt;{{GoogleTrans-en}}<br /> {{TeamHeader|Marketing Team}}&lt;/noinclude&gt;<br /> {{TOCright}}<br /> == Add an Event ==<br /> <br /> Would you like to represent Sugar Labs at an event near you? Follow this simple process.<br /> <br /> # Create a new page on the wiki, using [[User:Gdk/Events/PyCon2009]] as an example.<br /> # Link to the event in the [[#Upcoming Events]] section, below.<br /> # Send an email to '''events at sugarlabs dot org''' to have the event added to the official Google calendar of events.<br /> #: ''mail.sugarlabs.org'' account holders may follow [[Sugar_Labs/Events/Instructions | these instructions]].<br /> <br /> == Events: Google Calendar ==<br /> <br /> Sugar [[Sugar Labs/Events | community events]] are posted in a public calendar within the Google Calendar system. The calendar is available in a variety of formats: &lt;span class=&quot;plainlinks&quot;&gt; [http://www.google.com/calendar/feeds/6n9a99dr5knag9tp0obc0rncug%40group.calendar.google.com/public/basic {{filepath:XML.gif}}] [http://www.google.com/calendar/ical/h9cfuk10894em7a8moemquusmg%40group.calendar.google.com/public/basic.ics {{filepath:ICal.gif}}] [http://www.google.com/calendar/embed?src=6n9a99dr5knag9tp0obc0rncug%40group.calendar.google.com&amp;ctz=America/New_York {{filepath:HTML.gif}}].&lt;/span&gt;<br /> <br /> == Upcoming Events ==<br /> <br /> Sugar Labs has committed to having a presence at the following events.<br /> <br /> {| class=&quot;schedule sortable&quot; border=&quot;1&quot;<br /> ! Date !! Event !! Location !! Owner !! Details<br /> |-<br /> | 2010-04-03 – 2010-04-17 || [http://www.lca2010.org.nz/ LCA2010 website] || Wellington, NZ || [[User:Tabitha| Tabitha Roder]] || [[http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:Tabitha/Events/LCA2010 | LCA2010]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2010-01-18 – 2010-01-23 || [http://www.sciencefestival.co.uk/ Science Fest 2010] || Edinburgh, UK || [[User:Garycmartin| Gary C Martin]] || [[Marketing Team/Events/ScienceFest2010|Science Fest 2010]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2009-11-07 – 2009-11-12 || [http://www.sfscon.it/2009 SFScon 2009] || Bolzano, Italy || || [[Marketing Team/Events/Sugarcamp_Bolzano_2009 |SugarCamp Bolzano 2009]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2009-10-27 – 2009-10-29 || [http://www.masscue.org/ MassCUE] || near Boston, MA, USA || || [[Marketing Team/Events/MassCUE2009|MassCUE 2009]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2009-06-28 – 2009-07-01 || [http://center.uoregon.edu/ISTE/NECC2009/ NECC 2009] || Washington DC, USA || || [[Marketing Team/Events/NECC2009|NECC 2009]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2009-06-24 – 2009-06-27 || [http://www.linuxtag.org/2009/en.html LinuxTag 2009] || Berlin, Germany || [[User: Erikos| Simon Schampijer]] || [[Marketing Team/Events/LinuxTag2009|LinuxTag 2009]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2009-03-25 – 2009-04-02 || [http://us.pycon.org/2009/about/ PyCon 2009] || Chicago, IL, USA || [[User:Gdk | Greg DeKoenigsberg]] || [[User:Gdk/Events/PyCon2009|PyCon 2009]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2009-02-07 – 2009-02-08 || [http://fosdem.org FOSDEM 2009] || Brussels, Belgium || [[User: ChristophD| Christoph Derndorfer]] || [[Marketing Team/Events/FOSDEM_2009|FOSDEM 2009]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2009-01-19 – 2009-01-24 || [http://linux.conf.au/ linux.conf.au 09] || Hobart, Tasmania || [[User:Walter | Walter Bender]] || [[User:Walter/Events/Linux.conf.au09|LCA 09]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2008-12-02 – 2008-12-05 || [http://osdc.com.au/2008/ Open Source Developers Conference (OSDC)] || Sydney, Australia || [[User:joel | Joel Stanley]] || [[User:Joel/Events/OSDC2008 | OSDC 2008]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2008-11-24 – 2008-11-26 || [http://www.vitta.org.au/conferenceinfo Victorian IT Teachers Association (VITTA) conference] || Melbourne, Australia || [[User:joel | Joel Stanley]] || [[User:Joel/Events/VITTA2008 | VITTA 2008]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2008-11-13 – 2008-11-14 || [http://www.sfscon.it/2008/ South Tyrol Free Software conference (SFScon)] || Bolzano, Italy || [[User:Walter | Walter Bender]] || [[User:Walter/Events/SFScon08|SFScon 08]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2008-10-27 – 2008-10-30 || [http://www.cmp-egevents.com/web/escb ESC 2008] || Boston, MA, USA || [[User:Bernie | Bernie Innocenti]] || [https://www.cmpevents.com/ESCe08/a.asp?option=C&amp;V=11&amp;SessID=8164 Constructionist learning with Sugar and the Beagle Board]<br /> |-<br /> | 2008-10-26 – 2008-10-28 || [http://www.sarasotadesignsummit.com Sarasota International Design Summit] || Sarasota, FL, USA || [[User:Walter | Walter Bender]] || [[User:Walter/Events/Sarasota-Design-Summit|Sarasota Design Summit]]<br /> |}<br /> <br /> == Subpages ==<br /> {{Special:PrefixIndex/{{PAGENAMEE}}/}}<br /> <br /> [[Category:Event]]</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Marketing_Team/Events&diff=38756 2009-10-03T22:30:53Z

<p>Tabitha: /* Upcoming Events */</p> <hr /> <div>&lt;noinclude&gt;{{GoogleTrans-en}}<br /> {{TeamHeader|Marketing Team}}&lt;/noinclude&gt;<br /> {{TOCright}}<br /> == Add an Event ==<br /> <br /> Would you like to represent Sugar Labs at an event near you? Follow this simple process.<br /> <br /> # Create a new page on the wiki, using [[User:Gdk/Events/PyCon2009]] as an example.<br /> # Link to the event in the [[#Upcoming Events]] section, below.<br /> # Send an email to '''events at sugarlabs dot org''' to have the event added to the official Google calendar of events.<br /> #: ''mail.sugarlabs.org'' account holders may follow [[Sugar_Labs/Events/Instructions | these instructions]].<br /> <br /> == Events: Google Calendar ==<br /> <br /> Sugar [[Sugar Labs/Events | community events]] are posted in a public calendar within the Google Calendar system. The calendar is available in a variety of formats: &lt;span class=&quot;plainlinks&quot;&gt; [http://www.google.com/calendar/feeds/6n9a99dr5knag9tp0obc0rncug%40group.calendar.google.com/public/basic {{filepath:XML.gif}}] [http://www.google.com/calendar/ical/h9cfuk10894em7a8moemquusmg%40group.calendar.google.com/public/basic.ics {{filepath:ICal.gif}}] [http://www.google.com/calendar/embed?src=6n9a99dr5knag9tp0obc0rncug%40group.calendar.google.com&amp;ctz=America/New_York {{filepath:HTML.gif}}].&lt;/span&gt;<br /> <br /> == Upcoming Events ==<br /> <br /> Sugar Labs has committed to having a presence at the following events.<br /> <br /> {| class=&quot;schedule sortable&quot; border=&quot;1&quot;<br /> ! Date !! Event !! Location !! Owner !! Details<br /> |-<br /> | 2010-04-03 – 2010-04-17 || [http://www.lca2010.org.nz/ LCA2010 website] || Wellington, NZ || [[User:Tabitha| Tabitha Roder]] || [[http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:Tabitha/Events/LCA2010|LCA2010]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2010-01-18 – 2010-01-23 || [http://www.sciencefestival.co.uk/ Science Fest 2010] || Edinburgh, UK || [[User:Garycmartin| Gary C Martin]] || [[Marketing Team/Events/ScienceFest2010|Science Fest 2010]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2009-11-07 – 2009-11-12 || [http://www.sfscon.it/2009 SFScon 2009] || Bolzano, Italy || || [[Marketing Team/Events/Sugarcamp_Bolzano_2009 |SugarCamp Bolzano 2009]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2009-10-27 – 2009-10-29 || [http://www.masscue.org/ MassCUE] || near Boston, MA, USA || || [[Marketing Team/Events/MassCUE2009|MassCUE 2009]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2009-06-28 – 2009-07-01 || [http://center.uoregon.edu/ISTE/NECC2009/ NECC 2009] || Washington DC, USA || || [[Marketing Team/Events/NECC2009|NECC 2009]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2009-06-24 – 2009-06-27 || [http://www.linuxtag.org/2009/en.html LinuxTag 2009] || Berlin, Germany || [[User: Erikos| Simon Schampijer]] || [[Marketing Team/Events/LinuxTag2009|LinuxTag 2009]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2009-03-25 – 2009-04-02 || [http://us.pycon.org/2009/about/ PyCon 2009] || Chicago, IL, USA || [[User:Gdk | Greg DeKoenigsberg]] || [[User:Gdk/Events/PyCon2009|PyCon 2009]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2009-02-07 – 2009-02-08 || [http://fosdem.org FOSDEM 2009] || Brussels, Belgium || [[User: ChristophD| Christoph Derndorfer]] || [[Marketing Team/Events/FOSDEM_2009|FOSDEM 2009]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2009-01-19 – 2009-01-24 || [http://linux.conf.au/ linux.conf.au 09] || Hobart, Tasmania || [[User:Walter | Walter Bender]] || [[User:Walter/Events/Linux.conf.au09|LCA 09]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2008-12-02 – 2008-12-05 || [http://osdc.com.au/2008/ Open Source Developers Conference (OSDC)] || Sydney, Australia || [[User:joel | Joel Stanley]] || [[User:Joel/Events/OSDC2008 | OSDC 2008]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2008-11-24 – 2008-11-26 || [http://www.vitta.org.au/conferenceinfo Victorian IT Teachers Association (VITTA) conference] || Melbourne, Australia || [[User:joel | Joel Stanley]] || [[User:Joel/Events/VITTA2008 | VITTA 2008]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2008-11-13 – 2008-11-14 || [http://www.sfscon.it/2008/ South Tyrol Free Software conference (SFScon)] || Bolzano, Italy || [[User:Walter | Walter Bender]] || [[User:Walter/Events/SFScon08|SFScon 08]]<br /> |-<br /> | 2008-10-27 – 2008-10-30 || [http://www.cmp-egevents.com/web/escb ESC 2008] || Boston, MA, USA || [[User:Bernie | Bernie Innocenti]] || [https://www.cmpevents.com/ESCe08/a.asp?option=C&amp;V=11&amp;SessID=8164 Constructionist learning with Sugar and the Beagle Board]<br /> |-<br /> | 2008-10-26 – 2008-10-28 || [http://www.sarasotadesignsummit.com Sarasota International Design Summit] || Sarasota, FL, USA || [[User:Walter | Walter Bender]] || [[User:Walter/Events/Sarasota-Design-Summit|Sarasota Design Summit]]<br /> |}<br /> <br /> == Subpages ==<br /> {{Special:PrefixIndex/{{PAGENAMEE}}/}}<br /> <br /> [[Category:Event]]</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=File:LCA2010_logo.png&diff=38755 2009-10-03T22:28:29Z

<p>Tabitha: LCA2010 penguin logo</p> <hr /> <div>LCA2010 penguin logo</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=User:Tabitha/Events/LCA2010&diff=38754 2009-10-03T22:27:58Z

<p>Tabitha: /* LCA 2010 */</p> <hr /> <div>= LCA 2010 =<br /> <br /> [[File:LCA2010_logo.png|right]]<br /> <br /> == Event Details ==<br /> <br /> 18 - 23 January 2010, Wellington New Zealand<br /> <br /> For more information, go to the [http://www.lca2010.org.nz/ LCA2010 website].<br /> <br /> == Sugar Organizer ==<br /> <br /> [[User:Tabitha | Tabitha Roder]] (tabitha at hrdnz dot com) will be organizing Sugar's presence at LCA2010.<br /> <br /> == Attendees ==<br /> <br /> Are you planning to attend? Add your name and contact info below!<br /> <br /> # Tabitha Roder (tabitha at hrdnz dot com)<br /> # Your name here<br /> <br /> == Lodging ==<br /> <br /> See [http://www.lca2010.org.nz/ LCA2010 website]<br /> <br /> == Schedule ==<br /> <br /> See [http://www.lca2010.org.nz/ LCA2010 website]<br /> <br /> [[Category:Event]]<br /> <br /> __NOTOC__</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=User:Tabitha/Events/LCA2010&diff=38753 2009-10-03T22:27:03Z

<p>Tabitha: /* LCA 2010 */</p> <hr /> <div>= LCA 2010 =<br /> <br /> [[File:{LCA2010_logo.png}|{right}]]<br /> <br /> == Event Details ==<br /> <br /> 18 - 23 January 2010, Wellington New Zealand<br /> <br /> For more information, go to the [http://www.lca2010.org.nz/ LCA2010 website].<br /> <br /> == Sugar Organizer ==<br /> <br /> [[User:Tabitha | Tabitha Roder]] (tabitha at hrdnz dot com) will be organizing Sugar's presence at LCA2010.<br /> <br /> == Attendees ==<br /> <br /> Are you planning to attend? Add your name and contact info below!<br /> <br /> # Tabitha Roder (tabitha at hrdnz dot com)<br /> # Your name here<br /> <br /> == Lodging ==<br /> <br /> See [http://www.lca2010.org.nz/ LCA2010 website]<br /> <br /> == Schedule ==<br /> <br /> See [http://www.lca2010.org.nz/ LCA2010 website]<br /> <br /> [[Category:Event]]<br /> <br /> __NOTOC__</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=User:Tabitha/Events/LCA2010&diff=38752 2009-10-03T22:26:45Z

<p>Tabitha: </p> <hr /> <div>= LCA 2010 =<br /> <br /> [[File:{LCA2010_logo.png}|{right}]]<br /> <br /> == Event Details ==<br /> <br /> 18 - 23 January 2010, Wellington New Zealand<br /> <br /> For more information, go to the [http://www.lca2010.org.nz/ LCA2010 website].<br /> <br /> == Sugar Organizer ==<br /> <br /> [[User:Tabitha | Tabitha Roder]] (tabitha at hrdnz dot com) will be organizing Sugar's presence at LCA2010.<br /> <br /> == Attendees ==<br /> <br /> Are you planning to attend? Add your name and contact info below!<br /> <br /> # Tabitha Roder (tabitha at hrdnz dot com)<br /> # Your name here<br /> <br /> == Lodging ==<br /> <br /> See [http://www.lca2010.org.nz/ LCA2010 website]<br /> <br /> == Schedule ==<br /> <br /> See [http://www.lca2010.org.nz/ LCA2010 website]<br /> <br /> [[Category:Event]]<br /> <br /> __NOTOC__</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=User:Tabitha/Events/LCA2010&diff=38751 2009-10-03T22:24:49Z

<p>Tabitha: </p> <hr /> <div>= LCA 2010 =<br /> <br /> == Event Details ==<br /> <br /> 18 - 23 January 2010, Wellington New Zealand<br /> <br /> For more information, go to the [http://www.lca2010.org.nz/ LCA2010 website].<br /> <br /> == Sugar Organizer ==<br /> <br /> [[User:Tabitha | Tabitha Roder]] (tabitha at hrdnz dot com) will be organizing Sugar's presence at LCA2010.<br /> <br /> == Attendees ==<br /> <br /> Are you planning to attend? Add your name and contact info below!<br /> <br /> # Tabitha Roder (tabitha at hrdnz dot com)<br /> # Your name here<br /> <br /> == Lodging ==<br /> <br /> See [http://www.lca2010.org.nz/ LCA2010 website]<br /> <br /> == Schedule ==<br /> <br /> See [http://www.lca2010.org.nz/ LCA2010 website]<br /> <br /> [[Category:Event]]<br /> <br /> __NOTOC__</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=User:Tabitha/Events/LCA2010&diff=38750 2009-10-03T22:23:43Z

<p>Tabitha: </p> <hr /> <div>= LCA 2010 =<br /> <br /> == Event Details ==<br /> <br /> 18 - 23 January 2010, Wellington New Zealand<br /> <br /> For more information, go to the [http://www.lca2010.org.nz/ LCA2010 website].<br /> <br /> == Sugar Organizer ==<br /> <br /> [[User:Tabitha | Tabitha Roder]] (tabitha at hrdnz dot com) will be organizing Sugar's presence at LCA2010.<br /> <br /> == Attendees ==<br /> <br /> Are you planning to attend? Add your name and contact info below!<br /> <br /> # Tabitha Roder (tabitha at hrdnz dot com)<br /> # Your name here<br /> <br /> == Lodging ==<br /> <br /> See [http://www.lca2010.org.nz/ LCA2010 website]<br /> <br /> == Schedule ==<br /> <br /> See [http://www.lca2010.org.nz/ LCA2010 website]<br /> <br /> [[Category:Event]]<br /> No_TOC</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=User:Tabitha/Events/LCA2010&diff=38749 2009-10-03T22:23:09Z

<p>Tabitha: Created page with &#039;= LCA 2010 = == Event Details == 18 - 23 January 2010, Wellington New Zealand For more information, go to the [http://www.lca2010.org.nz/ LCA2010 website]. == Sugar Organizer…&#039;</p> <hr /> <div>= LCA 2010 =<br /> <br /> == Event Details ==<br /> <br /> 18 - 23 January 2010, Wellington New Zealand<br /> <br /> For more information, go to the [http://www.lca2010.org.nz/ LCA2010 website].<br /> <br /> == Sugar Organizer ==<br /> <br /> [[User:Tabitha | Tabitha Roder]] (tabitha at hrdnz dot com) will be organizing Sugar's presence at LCA2010.<br /> <br /> == Attendees ==<br /> <br /> Are you planning to attend? Add your name and contact info below!<br /> <br /> # Tabitha Roder (tabitha at hrdnz dot com)<br /> # Your name here<br /> <br /> == Lodging ==<br /> <br /> See [http://www.lca2010.org.nz/ LCA2010 website]<br /> <br /> == Schedule ==<br /> <br /> See [http://www.lca2010.org.nz/ LCA2010 website]<br /> <br /> [[Category:Event]]</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Decision_panels/SOAS&diff=38747 2009-10-03T21:23:40Z

<p>Tabitha: /* Talk summaries */</p> <hr /> <div>A 12-person SOAS decision panel was appointed by a [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-09-25#Decision_Panel|September, 2009]] Oversight Board decision.<br /> <br /> == Mandate ==<br /> {{quote|<br /> :&quot;Investigate the situation of how SoaS should be treated by Sugar Labs, and related questions, including answers to the following: <br /> :* &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot; <br /> :* &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot; <br /> :* &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot; <br /> :* Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question:&quot;Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?&quot; <br /> }}<br /> <br /> == Members ==<br /> * Sebastian Dziallas<br /> * Luke Faraone<br /> * Martin Dengler<br /> * Bill Bogstad<br /> * Faisal Khan<br /> * Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> * Samuel Klein<br /> * Sean Daly<br /> * Tabitha Roder<br /> * Caryl Bigenho<br /> * Daniel Drake<br /> * Abhishek Indoria <br /> <br /> <br /> == Process ==<br /> <br /> Discussion will take place on the [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archives/soas SOAS mailing list] with subject lines beginning with the text &quot;[DP]&quot;.<br /> <br /> == Talk summaries ==<br /> &lt;b&gt;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&lt;/b&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;b&gt;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another? &lt;/b&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;b&gt;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution? &lt;/b&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;b&gt;Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question: &quot;Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution? &lt;/b&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;b&gt;Potential naming conventions: &lt;/b&gt;<br /> * Sugar4CD/PC/F11 (Sugar, version 4, made for liveCD, runs on PCs, Fedora11 based) - example from Caryl Bigenho &lt;cbigenho@hotmail.com&gt;<br /> There has been much talk of whether we should name with different foods and animals. Types of sugar (sucrose, glucose) has been suggested due to its link to sustainability of life. <br /> There still seems to be much sense in keeping it simple with SoaS keeping one name with a version release number and corresponding release name.<br /> <br /> <br /> [[category:decision panels]]</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=User:TimClicks&diff=38744 2009-10-03T05:15:48Z

<p>Tabitha: </p> <hr /> <div>Kia ora, kei te pēhea koe? (Hi, how are you?)<br /> <br /> My name's Tim McNamara and am based in Wellington, New Zealand. My website is http://timmcnamara.co.nz.<br /> <br /> I'm a volunteer as part of the [http://laptop.org.nz WellyNZTesters]. I find Sugar to be a wonderful tool and look forward to seeing millions of children benefiting from everyone's hard work!<br /> <br /> Some ways to contact me:<br /> <br /> *'''Twitter''' http://twitter.com/timClicks<br /> *'''Facebook''' http://facebook.com/timClicks<br /> *'''IRC''' http://webchat.freenode.org timClicks (usually on #sahana, #olpc, #olpc-au and #sugar)<br /> <br /> [[Image:timclicks.jpg|thumb|175px]]<br /> <br /> &lt;hr /&gt;<br /> <br /> Postscript: About '''WellyNZTesters'''<br /> <br /> We are a volunteer group that meets weekly. It started in the middle of 2008 and are still going strong. We are spreading out across the country, with a group in Auckland and Christchurch.<br /> <br /> (Yes, you should come along if you can make it)<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Volunteer Interview - What makes Tim Click? ==<br /> <br /> '''When did you start being an OLPC volunteer?'''<br /> July 2009<br /> <br /> '''How did you start being an OLPC volunteer?'''<br /> I had heard about OLPC as the “$100 laptop project” in 2007. I heard you could only get them overseas. Later on I took the open source plunge and installed Ubuntu, then this other software project I was involved with were experimenting with the OLPC computer. That made me search the web and I found the Wellington testing group page on the internet. I thought I would contact them and see where it goes. <br /> For the first two weeks I learned about how the machine worked. I was lucky enough to be given an XO to take home. I was hooked. <br /> <br /> '''What is the other software project you are involved in?'''<br /> Sahana (relief in Sinhalese), a project aimed at enhancing coordination in emergencies, particularly in developing countries and locations with weak networks and computer power. There are some nice synergies between the aims of the two projects. I thought I would learn about how OLPC computers have been overcoming the same issues of connectivity and power in developing countries.<br /> <br /> '''What are your plans from here?'''<br /> I really want to help bring Sugar into New Zealand schools. I don’t think it is fair that students need to be impaired because their school couldn't afford the latest software and I feel that the Sugar project could bridge that gap. <br /> <br /> '''Is there something else you want to add?'''<br /> I would really encourage people to learn more about Sugar, and Sugar on a Stick. I would like the laptop.org.nz website to become the go to place for New Zealanders wanting to extend the education opportunities available for their children. <br /> <br /> Because Sugar runs on almost all computers that are in use today - I would like to see it being promoted to let children whose families cannot afford the latest gadgets. Sugar could easily rejuvenate a 2nd hand computer. This sounds much more sensible than throwing it out.<br /> <br /> <br /> ''Thanks to Tim McNamara for participating in this interview. You can find out more about Tim and his contact details:<br /> *Twitter or Identi.ca - timClicks<br /> *Sugar wiki - http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:TimClicks<br /> *IRC http://webchat.freenode.org timClicks (usually on #sahana, #olpc, #olpc-au and #sugar)<br /> *Facebook http://facebook.com/timClicks''</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=File:Timclicks.jpg&diff=38743 2009-10-03T05:14:12Z

<p>Tabitha: Photo of Tim McNamara</p> <hr /> <div>Photo of Tim McNamara</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=User:TimClicks&diff=38742 2009-10-03T05:13:29Z

<p>Tabitha: </p> <hr /> <div>Kia ora, kei te pēhea koe? (Hi, how are you?)<br /> <br /> My name's Tim McNamara and am based in Wellington, New Zealand. My website is http://timmcnamara.co.nz.<br /> <br /> I'm a volunteer as part of the [http://laptop.org.nz WellyNZTesters]. I find Sugar to be a wonderful tool and look forward to seeing millions of children benefiting from everyone's hard work!<br /> <br /> Some ways to contact me:<br /> <br /> *'''Twitter''' http://twitter.com/timClicks<br /> *'''Facebook''' http://facebook.com/timClicks<br /> *'''IRC''' http://webchat.freenode.org timClicks (usually on #sahana, #olpc, #olpc-au and #sugar)<br /> <br /> [[Image:timclicks.jpg]]<br /> <br /> &lt;hr /&gt;<br /> <br /> Postscript: About '''WellyNZTesters'''<br /> <br /> We are a volunteer group that meets weekly. It started in the middle of 2008 and are still going strong. We are spreading out across the country, with a group in Auckland and Christchurch.<br /> <br /> (Yes, you should come along if you can make it)<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Volunteer Interview - What makes Tim Click? ==<br /> <br /> '''When did you start being an OLPC volunteer?'''<br /> July 2009<br /> <br /> '''How did you start being an OLPC volunteer?'''<br /> I had heard about OLPC as the “$100 laptop project” in 2007. I heard you could only get them overseas. Later on I took the open source plunge and installed Ubuntu, then this other software project I was involved with were experimenting with the OLPC computer. That made me search the web and I found the Wellington testing group page on the internet. I thought I would contact them and see where it goes. <br /> For the first two weeks I learned about how the machine worked. I was lucky enough to be given an XO to take home. I was hooked. <br /> <br /> '''What is the other software project you are involved in?'''<br /> Sahana (relief in Sinhalese), a project aimed at enhancing coordination in emergencies, particularly in developing countries and locations with weak networks and computer power. There are some nice synergies between the aims of the two projects. I thought I would learn about how OLPC computers have been overcoming the same issues of connectivity and power in developing countries.<br /> <br /> '''What are your plans from here?'''<br /> I really want to help bring Sugar into New Zealand schools. I don’t think it is fair that students need to be impaired because their school couldn't afford the latest software and I feel that the Sugar project could bridge that gap. <br /> <br /> '''Is there something else you want to add?'''<br /> I would really encourage people to learn more about Sugar, and Sugar on a Stick. I would like the laptop.org.nz website to become the go to place for New Zealanders wanting to extend the education opportunities available for their children. <br /> <br /> Because Sugar runs on almost all computers that are in use today - I would like to see it being promoted to let children whose families cannot afford the latest gadgets. Sugar could easily rejuvenate a 2nd hand computer. This sounds much more sensible than throwing it out.<br /> <br /> <br /> ''Thanks to Tim McNamara for participating in this interview. You can find out more about Tim and his contact details:<br /> *Twitter or Identi.ca - timClicks<br /> *Sugar wiki - http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:TimClicks<br /> *IRC http://webchat.freenode.org timClicks (usually on #sahana, #olpc, #olpc-au and #sugar)<br /> *Facebook http://facebook.com/timClicks''</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=User:TimClicks&diff=38741 2009-10-03T05:13:13Z

<p>Tabitha: </p> <hr /> <div>Kia ora, kei te pēhea koe? (Hi, how are you?)<br /> <br /> My name's Tim McNamara and am based in Wellington, New Zealand. My website is http://timmcnamara.co.nz.<br /> <br /> I'm a volunteer as part of the [http://laptop.org.nz WellyNZTesters]. I find Sugar to be a wonderful tool and look forward to seeing millions of children benefiting from everyone's hard work!<br /> <br /> Some ways to contact me:<br /> <br /> *'''Twitter''' http://twitter.com/timClicks<br /> *'''Facebook''' http://facebook.com/timClicks<br /> *'''IRC''' http://webchat.freenode.org timClicks (usually on #sahana, #olpc, #olpc-au and #sugar)<br /> <br /> [Image:timclicks.jpg]<br /> <br /> &lt;hr /&gt;<br /> <br /> Postscript: About '''WellyNZTesters'''<br /> <br /> We are a volunteer group that meets weekly. It started in the middle of 2008 and are still going strong. We are spreading out across the country, with a group in Auckland and Christchurch.<br /> <br /> (Yes, you should come along if you can make it)<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Volunteer Interview - What makes Tim Click? ==<br /> <br /> '''When did you start being an OLPC volunteer?'''<br /> July 2009<br /> <br /> '''How did you start being an OLPC volunteer?'''<br /> I had heard about OLPC as the “$100 laptop project” in 2007. I heard you could only get them overseas. Later on I took the open source plunge and installed Ubuntu, then this other software project I was involved with were experimenting with the OLPC computer. That made me search the web and I found the Wellington testing group page on the internet. I thought I would contact them and see where it goes. <br /> For the first two weeks I learned about how the machine worked. I was lucky enough to be given an XO to take home. I was hooked. <br /> <br /> '''What is the other software project you are involved in?'''<br /> Sahana (relief in Sinhalese), a project aimed at enhancing coordination in emergencies, particularly in developing countries and locations with weak networks and computer power. There are some nice synergies between the aims of the two projects. I thought I would learn about how OLPC computers have been overcoming the same issues of connectivity and power in developing countries.<br /> <br /> '''What are your plans from here?'''<br /> I really want to help bring Sugar into New Zealand schools. I don’t think it is fair that students need to be impaired because their school couldn't afford the latest software and I feel that the Sugar project could bridge that gap. <br /> <br /> '''Is there something else you want to add?'''<br /> I would really encourage people to learn more about Sugar, and Sugar on a Stick. I would like the laptop.org.nz website to become the go to place for New Zealanders wanting to extend the education opportunities available for their children. <br /> <br /> Because Sugar runs on almost all computers that are in use today - I would like to see it being promoted to let children whose families cannot afford the latest gadgets. Sugar could easily rejuvenate a 2nd hand computer. This sounds much more sensible than throwing it out.<br /> <br /> <br /> ''Thanks to Tim McNamara for participating in this interview. You can find out more about Tim and his contact details:<br /> *Twitter or Identi.ca - timClicks<br /> *Sugar wiki - http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:TimClicks<br /> *IRC http://webchat.freenode.org timClicks (usually on #sahana, #olpc, #olpc-au and #sugar)<br /> *Facebook http://facebook.com/timClicks''</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=User:TimClicks&diff=38732 2009-10-03T00:02:05Z

<p>Tabitha: </p> <hr /> <div>Kia ora, kei te pēhea koe? (Hi, how are you?)<br /> <br /> My name's Tim McNamara and am based in Wellington, New Zealand. My website is http://timmcnamara.co.nz.<br /> <br /> I'm a volunteer as part of the [http://laptop.org.nz WellyNZTesters]. I find Sugar to be a wonderful tool and look forward to seeing millions of children benefiting from everyone's hard work!<br /> <br /> Some ways to contact me:<br /> <br /> *'''Twitter''' http://twitter.com/timClicks<br /> *'''Facebook''' http://facebook.com/timClicks<br /> *'''IRC''' http://webchat.freenode.org timClicks (usually on #sahana, #olpc, #olpc-au and #sugar)<br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;hr /&gt;<br /> <br /> Postscript: About '''WellyNZTesters'''<br /> <br /> We are a volunteer group that meets weekly. It started in the middle of 2008 and are still going strong. We are spreading out across the country, with a group in Auckland and Christchurch.<br /> <br /> (Yes, you should come along if you can make it)<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Volunteer Interview - What makes Tim Click? ==<br /> <br /> '''When did you start being an OLPC volunteer?'''<br /> July 2009<br /> <br /> '''How did you start being an OLPC volunteer?'''<br /> I had heard about OLPC as the “$100 laptop project” in 2007. I heard you could only get them overseas. Later on I took the open source plunge and installed Ubuntu, then this other software project I was involved with were experimenting with the OLPC computer. That made me search the web and I found the Wellington testing group page on the internet. I thought I would contact them and see where it goes. <br /> For the first two weeks I learned about how the machine worked. I was lucky enough to be given an XO to take home. I was hooked. <br /> <br /> '''What is the other software project you are involved in?'''<br /> Sahana (relief in Sinhalese), a project aimed at enhancing coordination in emergencies, particularly in developing countries and locations with weak networks and computer power. There are some nice synergies between the aims of the two projects. I thought I would learn about how OLPC computers have been overcoming the same issues of connectivity and power in developing countries.<br /> <br /> '''What are your plans from here?'''<br /> I really want to help bring Sugar into New Zealand schools. I don’t think it is fair that students need to be impaired because their school couldn't afford the latest software and I feel that the Sugar project could bridge that gap. <br /> <br /> '''Is there something else you want to add?'''<br /> I would really encourage people to learn more about Sugar, and Sugar on a Stick. I would like the laptop.org.nz website to become the go to place for New Zealanders wanting to extend the education opportunities available for their children. <br /> <br /> Because Sugar runs on almost all computers that are in use today - I would like to see it being promoted to let children whose families cannot afford the latest gadgets. Sugar could easily rejuvenate a 2nd hand computer. This sounds much more sensible than throwing it out.<br /> <br /> <br /> ''Thanks to Tim McNamara for participating in this interview. You can find out more about Tim and his contact details:<br /> *Twitter or Identi.ca - timClicks<br /> *Sugar wiki - http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:TimClicks<br /> *IRC http://webchat.freenode.org timClicks (usually on #sahana, #olpc, #olpc-au and #sugar)<br /> *Facebook http://facebook.com/timClicks''</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Decision_panels/SOAS&diff=38542 2009-09-30T08:53:24Z

<p>Tabitha: </p> <hr /> <div>A 12-person SOAS decision panel was appointed by a [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-09-25#Decision_Panel|September, 2009]] Oversight Board decision.<br /> <br /> == Mandate ==<br /> {{quote|<br /> :&quot;Investigate the situation of how SoaS should be treated by Sugar Labs, and related questions, including answers to the following: <br /> :* &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot; <br /> :* &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot; <br /> :* &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot; <br /> :* Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question:&quot;Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?&quot; <br /> }}<br /> <br /> == Members ==<br /> * Sebastian Dziallas<br /> * Luke Faraone<br /> * Martin Dengler<br /> * Bill Bogstad<br /> * Faisal Khan<br /> * Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> * Samuel Klein<br /> * Sean Daly<br /> * Tabitha Roder<br /> * Caryl Bigenho<br /> * Daniel Drake<br /> * Abhishek Indoria <br /> <br /> <br /> == Process ==<br /> The process for discussion and reaching a decision is not yet set.<br /> <br /> <br /> == Talk summaries ==<br /> &lt;b&gt;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&lt;/b&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;b&gt;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another? &lt;/b&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;b&gt;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution? &lt;/b&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;b&gt;Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question: &quot;Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution? &lt;/b&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;b&gt;Potential naming conventions: &lt;/b&gt;<br /> * Sugar4CD/PC/F11 (Sugar, version 4, made for liveCD, runs on PCs, Fedora11 based) - example from Caryl Bigenho &lt;cbigenho@hotmail.com&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[category:decision panels]]</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Decision_panels/SOAS&diff=38541 2009-09-30T08:52:36Z

<p>Tabitha: /* Process */</p> <hr /> <div>A 12-person SOAS decision panel was appointed by a [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-09-25#Decision_Panel|September, 2009]] Oversight Board decision.<br /> <br /> == Mandate ==<br /> {{quote|<br /> :&quot;Investigate the situation of how SoaS should be treated by Sugar Labs, and related questions, including answers to the following: <br /> :* &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot; <br /> :* &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot; <br /> :* &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot; <br /> :* Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question:&quot;Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?&quot; <br /> }}<br /> <br /> == Members ==<br /> * Sebastian Dziallas<br /> * Luke Faraone<br /> * Martin Dengler<br /> * Bill Bogstad<br /> * Faisal Khan<br /> * Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> * Samuel Klein<br /> * Sean Daly<br /> * Tabitha Roder<br /> * Caryl Bigenho<br /> * Daniel Drake<br /> * Abhishek Indoria <br /> <br /> <br /> == Process ==<br /> The process for discussion and reaching a decision is not yet set.<br /> <br /> [[category:decision panels]]<br /> <br /> &lt;b&gt;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&lt;/b&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;b&gt;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another? &lt;/b&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;b&gt;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution? &lt;/b&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;b&gt;Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question: &quot;Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution? &lt;/b&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;b&gt;Potential naming conventions: &lt;/b&gt;<br /> * Sugar4CD/PC/F11 (Sugar, version 4, made for liveCD, runs on PCs, Fedora11 based) - example from Caryl Bigenho &lt;cbigenho@hotmail.com&gt;</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Decision_panels/SOAS&diff=38540 2009-09-30T08:50:11Z

<p>Tabitha: </p> <hr /> <div>A 12-person SOAS decision panel was appointed by a [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-09-25#Decision_Panel|September, 2009]] Oversight Board decision.<br /> <br /> == Mandate ==<br /> {{quote|<br /> :&quot;Investigate the situation of how SoaS should be treated by Sugar Labs, and related questions, including answers to the following: <br /> :* &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot; <br /> :* &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot; <br /> :* &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot; <br /> :* Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question:&quot;Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?&quot; <br /> }}<br /> <br /> == Members ==<br /> * Sebastian Dziallas<br /> * Luke Faraone<br /> * Martin Dengler<br /> * Bill Bogstad<br /> * Faisal Khan<br /> * Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> * Samuel Klein<br /> * Sean Daly<br /> * Tabitha Roder<br /> * Caryl Bigenho<br /> * Daniel Drake<br /> * Abhishek Indoria <br /> <br /> <br /> == Process ==<br /> The process for discussion and reaching a decision is not yet set.<br /> <br /> [[category:decision panels]]<br /> <br /> ===Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases? ===<br /> <br /> ===Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another? ===<br /> <br /> ===Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution? ===<br /> <br /> ===Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question: &quot;Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution? ===</div>

Tabitha https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Decision_panels/SOAS&diff=38539 2009-09-30T08:49:18Z

<p>Tabitha: /* Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases? */</p> <hr /> <div>A 12-person SOAS decision panel was appointed by a [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-09-25#Decision_Panel|September, 2009]] Oversight Board decision.<br /> <br /> == Mandate ==<br /> {{quote|<br /> :&quot;Investigate the situation of how SoaS should be treated by Sugar Labs, and related questions, including answers to the following: <br /> :* &quot;Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?&quot; <br /> :* &quot;Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?&quot; <br /> :* &quot;Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?&quot; <br /> :* Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question:&quot;Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?&quot; <br /> }}<br /> <br /> == Members ==<br /> * Sebastian Dziallas<br /> * Luke Faraone<br /> * Martin Dengler<br /> * Bill Bogstad<br /> * Faisal Khan<br /> * Benjamin M. Schwartz<br /> * Samuel Klein<br /> * Sean Daly<br /> * Tabitha Roder<br /> * Caryl Bigenho<br /> * Daniel Drake<br /> * Abhishek Indoria <br /> <br /> <br /> == Process ==<br /> The process for discussion and reaching a decision is not yet set.<br /> <br /> [[category:decision panels]]<br /> <br /> ====Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases? ===<br /> <br /> ==Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another? ==<br /> <br /> ==Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution? ==<br /> <br /> ==Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question: &quot;Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution? ==</div>

Tabitha