Decision panels/SOAS/Report - Revision history

FGrose at 03:42, 6 March 2011

2011-03-06T03:42:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:42, 5 March 2011
Line 36:		Line 36:
	===Mandate===		===Mandate===

	{{~~quote~~\|		{{Box\|
	:"Investigate the situation of how SoaS should be treated by Sugar Labs, and related questions, including answers to the following:		:"Investigate the situation of how SoaS should be treated by Sugar Labs, and related questions, including answers to the following:
	:* "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?"		:* "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?"

Sj: .

2010-02-11T23:29:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:29, 11 February 2010
Line 139:		Line 139:
	\|}		\|}

	===Conclusion===		=== DP Conclusion===
	''to come''		''to come''


	===Appendices===		===Appendices===

Sj: .

2009-10-29T22:49:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:49, 29 October 2009
Line 21:		Line 21:

	;Question 1: "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?"		;Question 1: "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?"
	;Answer: Consensus trending towards ''yes''. There has been some discussion about what is involved in 'being a GNU/Linux distributor' and what the risks and benefits would be; specifics have been suggested but not clearly enumerated, making consensus building harder. [[#Question_1\|TBD - see below for opinions]]		;Answer: Consensus trending towards '''yes'''. There has been some discussion about what is involved in 'being a GNU/Linux distributor' and what the risks and benefits would be; specifics have been suggested but not clearly enumerated, making consensus building harder. [[#Question_1\|TBD - see below for opinions]]

	;Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"		;Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"
	;Answer: Consensus ~~seems to be~~ '''yes'''. There are requests for clarification of how SL can promote effective ways of distributing Sugar, and endorse all good distributions. [[#Question_2\|TBD - see below for opinions]]		;Answer: Consensus is '''yes'''. There are requests for clarification of how SL can promote effective ways of distributing Sugar, and endorse all good distributions. [[#Question_2\|TBD - see below for opinions]]

	;Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"		;Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"

Sj: .

2009-10-29T22:48:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:48, 29 October 2009
Line 200:		Line 200:
	\| valign="top"\| <!-- invalid question -->		\| valign="top"\| <!-- invalid question -->
	\| valign="top"\| <!-- defer -->		\| valign="top"\| <!-- defer -->
	# Samuel Klein - <small>SL should support effective distros; this can be done neutrally. </small>		Samuel Klein - <small>SL should support effective distros; this can be done neutrally. </small>
	\| valign="top"\| <!-- undecided -->		\| valign="top"\| <!-- undecided -->
	Bill Bogstad, Faisal Khan, Daniel Drake		Bill Bogstad, Faisal Khan, Daniel Drake

	\|-		\|-
	\|colspan=5\|		\|colspan=5\|

	=====Question 3=====		=====Question 3=====
	"Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"		"Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"

Sj: top

2009-10-29T22:48:09Z

top

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:48, 29 October 2009
Line 76:		Line 76:
	! Undecided		! Undecided
	\|-		\|-
	\|		\| valign="top"\|
	# Yes. Without it Sugar Labs has nothing to encourage the use of or promote that is of direct use to anyone other then programmers or the people who assemble Linux distributions. [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000029.html (reference)] [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000032.html counterpoint]. There is real interest and are real plans to do this [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000100.html (reference)].		# Yes. Without it Sugar Labs has nothing to encourage the use of or promote that is of direct use to anyone other then programmers or the people who assemble Linux distributions. [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000029.html (reference)] [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000032.html counterpoint]. There is real interest and are real plans to do this [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000100.html (reference)].
	# Yes. We greatly appreciate the work of those who have contributed to SoaS Strawberry and Blueberry. We regard these products as valuable, critical distribution mechanism for Sugar, and we will do what we can to ensure their continued development. [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008681.html (reference)]		# Yes. We greatly appreciate the work of those who have contributed to SoaS Strawberry and Blueberry. We regard these products as valuable, critical distribution mechanism for Sugar, and we will do what we can to ensure their continued development. [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008681.html (reference)]
	\|		\| valign="top"\|
	# No, not now. SL is not now a full-service GNU/Linux distributor and being one is not in SL's [[Sugar Labs#Mission\|mission statment]]; "[[What_is_Sugar%3F\|Sugar learning platform]]" is not a GNU/Linux distribution. [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000056.html counterpoint] [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000057.html counter-counterpoint]. However many contributors volunteer to help with individual tasks thereof; and an official plan is part of a number of SugarLabs' members published plans. Sugar Labs is better off spending its scarce resources on the [[What_is_Sugar%3F\|Sugar learning platform]]. Distribution work is is really hard and labour-intensive and being done by major distro vendors already (Debian, Fedora [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000168.html (reference)]		# No, not now. SL is not now a full-service GNU/Linux distributor and being one is not in SL's [[Sugar Labs#Mission\|mission statment]]; "[[What_is_Sugar%3F\|Sugar learning platform]]" is not a GNU/Linux distribution. [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000056.html counterpoint] [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000057.html counter-counterpoint]. However many contributors volunteer to help with individual tasks thereof; and an official plan is part of a number of SugarLabs' members published plans. Sugar Labs is better off spending its scarce resources on the [[What_is_Sugar%3F\|Sugar learning platform]]. Distribution work is is really hard and labour-intensive and being done by major distro vendors already (Debian, Fedora [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000168.html (reference)]
	\|		\| valign="top"\|
	# Invalid question. An answer to this question is not needed for Sugar Labs' members to get on with their work, and the results from a decision panel will not have any effect [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008751.html ref].		# Invalid question. An answer to this question is not needed for Sugar Labs' members to get on with their work, and the results from a decision panel will not have any effect [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008751.html ref].
	\|		\| valign="top"\|
	# Undecided. The two sides of the argument don't seem to be speaking directly to one anothers' issue [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000175.html (reference)] [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000178.html counterpoint]		# Undecided. The two sides of the argument don't seem to be speaking directly to one anothers' issue [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000175.html (reference)] [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000178.html counterpoint]
	\|}		\|}
Line 103:		Line 103:
	! Undecided		! Undecided
	\|-		\|-
	\|		\| valign="top"\|
	# Yes.		# Yes.
	\|		\| valign="top"\|
	# No. Sugar On a Stick, the Fedora-derived distribution, will be the endorsed distribution. SL needs to influence the distribution so drastically that it is effectively controlling it [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000125.html (reference)] [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000128.html counterpoint]		# No. Sugar On a Stick, the Fedora-derived distribution, will be the endorsed distribution. SL needs to influence the distribution so drastically that it is effectively controlling it [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000125.html (reference)] [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000128.html counterpoint]
	\|		\| valign="top"\|
	# Invalid question. An answer to this question is not needed for Sugar Labs' members to get on with their work, and the results from a decision panel will not have any effect [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008751.html ref].		# Invalid question. An answer to this question is not needed for Sugar Labs' members to get on with their work, and the results from a decision panel will not have any effect [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008751.html ref].
	# Invalid framing. Sugar Labs should be able to endorse the best methods of distributing Sugar, and not feel their hands are tied with a need to endorse all distros, regardless of their quality, or of how prominent Sugar is in the distro.		# Invalid framing. Sugar Labs should be able to endorse the best methods of distributing Sugar, and not feel their hands are tied with a need to endorse all distros, regardless of their quality, or of how prominent Sugar is in the distro.
	\|		\| valign="top"\|
	# Undecided: what do "neutral" and "endorse" mean? We need to be more clear about these definitions in order to answer [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000169.html (reference)]		# Undecided: what do "neutral" and "endorse" mean? We need to be more clear about these definitions in order to answer [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000169.html (reference)]
	\|}		\|}
Line 128:		Line 128:
	! Undecided		! Undecided
	\|-		\|-
	\|		\| valign="top"\|
	# Yes. Sugar on a Stick is the central pillar of our marketing strategy [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000048.html (reference)]. It's not trademarked, but should be [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000045.html (reference)]. SL does not want to confuse its users and a light touch like this is all that's needed [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008403.html (reference)]		# Yes. Sugar on a Stick is the central pillar of our marketing strategy [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000048.html (reference)]. It's not trademarked, but should be [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000045.html (reference)]. SL does not want to confuse its users and a light touch like this is all that's needed [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008403.html (reference)]
	\|		\| valign="top"\|
	# No.		# No.
	\|		\| valign="top"\|
	# Invalid question. An answer to this question is not needed for Sugar Labs' members to get on with their work, and the results from a decision panel will not have any effect [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008751.html ref].		# Invalid question. An answer to this question is not needed for Sugar Labs' members to get on with their work, and the results from a decision panel will not have any effect [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008751.html ref].
	# Too specific a question. Limiting SOAS to referring to a Fedora distribution is not necessary to avoid using names in a confusing way.		# Too specific a question. Limiting SOAS to referring to a Fedora distribution is not necessary to avoid using names in a confusing way.
	\|		\| valign="top"\|
	# Undecided. While it's reasonable for SL as a community to have a "don't be confusing" policy that applies equally to all of its projects, that has nothing to do with trademark per se. [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000175.html (reference)]		# Undecided. While it's reasonable for SL as a community to have a "don't be confusing" policy that applies equally to all of its projects, that has nothing to do with trademark per se. [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000175.html (reference)]
	\|}		\|}

Sj: ..

2009-10-29T22:46:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:46, 29 October 2009
Line 199:		Line 199:
	# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]		# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]
	\| valign="top"\| <!-- invalid question -->		\| valign="top"\| <!-- invalid question -->
	~~# Samuel Klein - <small>SL should support effective distros more than ineffective ones. </small>~~
	\| valign="top"\| <!-- defer -->		\| valign="top"\| <!-- defer -->
			# Samuel Klein - <small>SL should support effective distros; this can be done neutrally. </small>
	\| valign="top"\| <!-- undecided -->		\| valign="top"\| <!-- undecided -->
	Bill Bogstad, Faisal Khan, Daniel Drake		Bill Bogstad, Faisal Khan, Daniel Drake
Line 226:		Line 226:
	# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000289.html Benjamin M. Schwartz] - <small>use a more specific name</small>		# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000289.html Benjamin M. Schwartz] - <small>use a more specific name</small>
	\| valign="top"\| <!-- invalid question -->		\| valign="top"\| <!-- invalid question -->
	Samuel Klein - <small>~~Too~~ specific. ~~Avoid being confusing~~, ~~but SOAS could still refer to a line of~~ '~~sticks~~'.</small>		Samuel Klein - <small>The question is too specific. I agree with both Ben and Sean, who feel they fall on 'Yes' and 'No' sides of the fence.</small>
	\| valign="top"\| <!-- defer -->		\| valign="top"\| <!-- defer -->
	\| valign="top"\| <!-- undecided -->		\| valign="top"\| <!-- undecided -->

Sj: .

2009-10-29T22:41:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:41, 29 October 2009
Line 148:		Line 148:

	{\| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;" cellspacing=2 cellpadding=2		{\| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;" cellspacing=2 cellpadding=2
	\|+		\|-
			\|colspan=5\|
	===== Question 1 =====		===== Question 1 =====
	"Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing		"Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing

Sj: format

2009-10-29T22:40:23Z

format

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:40, 29 October 2009
Line 147:		Line 147:
	==== Recorded opinions ====		==== Recorded opinions ====

			{\| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;" cellspacing=2 cellpadding=2
			\|+
	===== Question 1 =====		===== Question 1 =====
			"Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing
	~~{\| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"~~
	~~\|+ Question 1:~~ "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing
	Sugar releases?"		Sugar releases?"
	\|-		\|-
	!width="30%"\| Yes		!width="30%"\| Yes
	!width="30%"\| No		!width="20%"\| No
	!width="20%"\| Invalid		!width="20%"\| Invalid
	!width="10%"\| Defer		!width="15%"\| Defer
	! Undecided \|		! Undecided \|
	\|-		\|-
Line 175:		Line 175:
	\| valign="top"\| <!-- undecided -->		\| valign="top"\| <!-- undecided -->
	Faisal Khan, Daniel Drake		Faisal Khan, Daniel Drake
	\|}

			\|-
			\|colspan=5\|
	=====Question 2=====		=====Question 2=====
			"Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"
	~~{\| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"~~
	~~\|+ Question 2:~~ "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"
	\|-		\|-
	!width="30%" \| Yes		!width="30%" \| Yes
	!width="30%" \| No		!width="20%" \| No
	!width="20%" \| Invalid		!width="20%" \| Invalid
	!width="10%" \| Defer		!width="15%" \| Defer
	! Undecided		! Undecided
	\|-		\|-
Line 194:		Line 193:
	# Luke Faraone		# Luke Faraone
	# Sebastian Dziallas		# Sebastian Dziallas
	# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000289.html Benjamin M. Schwartz] - SL should make specific, not blanket endorsements		# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000289.html Benjamin M. Schwartz] - <small>SL should make specific, not blanket endorsements</small>
	# Sean Daly - SL should make only context-specific endorsements		# Sean Daly - <small>SL should make only context-specific endorsements</small>
	\| valign="top"\| <!-- no -->		\| valign="top"\| <!-- no -->
	# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]		# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]
	\| valign="top"\| <!-- invalid question -->		\| valign="top"\| <!-- invalid question -->
	# Samuel Klein - SL should support effective distros more than ineffective ones.		# Samuel Klein - <small>SL should support effective distros more than ineffective ones. </small>
	\| valign="top"\| <!-- defer -->		\| valign="top"\| <!-- defer -->
	\| valign="top"\| <!-- undecided -->		\| valign="top"\| <!-- undecided -->
	Bill Bogstad, Faisal Khan, Daniel Drake		Bill Bogstad, Faisal Khan, Daniel Drake
	\|}

			\|-
			\|colspan=5\|
	=====Question 3=====		=====Question 3=====
			"Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"
	~~{\| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse;"~~
	~~\|+ Question 3:~~ "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"
	\|-		\|-
	!width="35%"\| Yes		!width="30%"\| Yes
	!width="35%"\| No		!width="20%"\| No
	!width="20%"\| Invalid		!width="20%"\| Invalid
	!width="10%"\| Defer		!width="15%"\| Defer
	! Undecided		! Undecided
	\|-		\|-
Line 225:		Line 223:
	# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]		# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]
	# Caryl Bigenho		# Caryl Bigenho
	# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000289.html Benjamin M. Schwartz] - use a more specific name		# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000289.html Benjamin M. Schwartz] - <small>use a more specific name</small>
	\| valign="top"\| <!-- invalid question -->		\| valign="top"\| <!-- invalid question -->
	Samuel Klein - Too specific. Avoid being confusing; SOAS could still refer to a ~~branded~~ line of 'sticks'.		Samuel Klein - <small>Too specific. Avoid being confusing, but SOAS could still refer to a line of 'sticks'.</small>
	\| valign="top"\| <!-- defer -->		\| valign="top"\| <!-- defer -->
	\| valign="top"\| <!-- undecided -->		\| valign="top"\| <!-- undecided -->
	Bill Bogstad, Faisal Khan, Daniel Drake		Bill Bogstad, Faisal Khan, Daniel Drake

	\|}		\|}

Sj: top

2009-10-29T22:30:03Z

top

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:30, 29 October 2009
Line 157:		Line 157:
	!width="20%"\| Invalid		!width="20%"\| Invalid
	!width="10%"\| Defer		!width="10%"\| Defer
	! Undecided		! Undecided \|
	\|-		\|-
	\| <!-- yes -->		\| valign="top"\| <!-- yes -->
	# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000100.html Sean Daly]		# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000100.html Sean Daly]
	# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000029.html Bill Bogstead]		# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000029.html Bill Bogstead]
Line 166:		Line 166:
	# Sebastian Dziallas		# Sebastian Dziallas
	# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000289.html Benjamin M. Schwartz]		# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000289.html Benjamin M. Schwartz]
	\| <!-- no -->		\| valign="top"\| <!-- no -->
	# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]		# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]
	# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000154.html Tabitha Roder]		# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000154.html Tabitha Roder]
	# Caryl Bigenho		# Caryl Bigenho
	\| <!-- invalid question -->		\| valign="top"\| <!-- invalid question -->
	\| <!-- defer -->		\| valign="top"\| <!-- defer -->
	# Samuel Klein		Samuel Klein
	\| <!-- undecided -->		\| valign="top"\| <!-- undecided -->
	# Faisal Khan		Faisal Khan, Daniel Drake
	# Daniel Drake
	\|}		\|}

Line 183:		Line 182:
	\|+ Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"		\|+ Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"
	\|-		\|-
	!width="30%"\| Yes		!width="30%" \| Yes
	!width="30%"\| No		!width="30%" \| No
	!width="20%"\| Invalid		!width="20%" \| Invalid
	!width="10%"\| Defer		!width="10%" \| Defer
	! Undecided		! Undecided
	\|-		\|-
	\| <!-- yes -->		\| valign="top"\| <!-- yes -->
	# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]		# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]
	# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000154.html Tabitha Roder]		# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000154.html Tabitha Roder]
Line 197:		Line 196:
	# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000289.html Benjamin M. Schwartz] - SL should make specific, not blanket endorsements		# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000289.html Benjamin M. Schwartz] - SL should make specific, not blanket endorsements
	# Sean Daly - SL should make only context-specific endorsements		# Sean Daly - SL should make only context-specific endorsements
	\| <!-- no -->		\| valign="top"\| <!-- no -->
	# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]		# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]
	\| <!-- invalid question -->		\| valign="top"\| <!-- invalid question -->
	# Samuel Klein - SL should support effective distros more than ineffective ones.		# Samuel Klein - SL should support effective distros more than ineffective ones.
	\| <!-- defer -->		\| valign="top"\| <!-- defer -->
	\| <!-- undecided -->		\| valign="top"\| <!-- undecided -->
	# Bill Bogstad		Bill Bogstad, Faisal Khan, Daniel Drake
	# Faisal Khan
	# Daniel Drake
	\|}		\|}

Line 213:		Line 210:
	\|+ Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"		\|+ Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"
	\|-		\|-
	!width="20%"\| Yes		!width="35%"\| Yes
	!width="20%"\| No		!width="35%"\| No
	!width="20%"\| Invalid		!width="20%"\| Invalid
	!width="10%"\| Defer		!width="10%"\| Defer
	! Undecided		! Undecided
	\|-		\|-
	\| <!-- yes -->		\| valign="top"\| <!-- yes -->
	# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000045.html Sean Daly] <small>SL should reserve the right to determine which distro to associate with SOAS, today Fedora, but possibly another later.</small>		# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000045.html Sean Daly] <small>SL should reserve the right to determine which distro to associate with SOAS, today Fedora, but possibly another later.</small>
	# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]		# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]
Line 225:		Line 222:
	# Luke Faraone		# Luke Faraone
	# Sebastian Dziallas		# Sebastian Dziallas
	\| <!-- no -->		\| valign="top"\| <!-- no -->
	# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]		# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]
	# Caryl Bigenho		# Caryl Bigenho
	# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000289.html Benjamin M. Schwartz] - use a more specific name		# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000289.html Benjamin M. Schwartz] - use a more specific name
	\| <!-- invalid question -->		\| valign="top"\| <!-- invalid question -->
	# Samuel Klein - Too specific. Avoid being confusing; SOAS could still refer to a branded line of 'sticks'.		Samuel Klein - Too specific. Avoid being confusing; SOAS could still refer to a branded line of 'sticks'.
	\| <!-- defer -->		\| valign="top"\| <!-- defer -->
	\| <!-- undecided -->		\| valign="top"\| <!-- undecided -->
	# Bill Bogstad		Bill Bogstad, Faisal Khan, Daniel Drake
	# Faisal Khan
	# Daniel Drake
	\|}		\|}

Sj: format for space, add sean for #2

2009-10-29T22:25:38Z

format for space, add sean for #2

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:25, 29 October 2009
Line 153:		Line 153:
	Sugar releases?"		Sugar releases?"
	\|-		\|-
	!width="20%"\| Yes		!width="30%"\| Yes
	!width="20%"\| No		!width="30%"\| No
	~~!width="20%"\| Defer~~
	!width="20%"\| Invalid		!width="20%"\| Invalid
			!width="10%"\| Defer
	! Undecided		! Undecided
	\|-		\|-
Line 170:		Line 170:
	# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000154.html Tabitha Roder]		# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000154.html Tabitha Roder]
	# Caryl Bigenho		# Caryl Bigenho
			\| <!-- invalid question -->
	\| <!-- defer -->		\| <!-- defer -->
	# Samuel Klein		# Samuel Klein
	~~\| <!-- invalid question -->~~
	\| <!-- undecided -->		\| <!-- undecided -->
	# Faisal Khan		# Faisal Khan
Line 183:		Line 183:
	\|+ Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"		\|+ Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"
	\|-		\|-
	!width="20%"\| Yes		!width="30%"\| Yes
	!width="20%"\| No		!width="30%"\| No
	~~!width="20%"\| Defer~~
	!width="20%"\| Invalid		!width="20%"\| Invalid
			!width="10%"\| Defer
	! Undecided		! Undecided
	\|-		\|-
Line 195:		Line 195:
	# Luke Faraone		# Luke Faraone
	# Sebastian Dziallas		# Sebastian Dziallas
	# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000289.html Benjamin M. Schwartz] - SL should make ~~personalized~~, not blanket, endorsements		# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000289.html Benjamin M. Schwartz] - SL should make specific, not blanket endorsements
			# Sean Daly - SL should make only context-specific endorsements
	\| <!-- no -->		\| <!-- no -->
	# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]		# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]
			\| <!-- invalid question -->
			# Samuel Klein - SL should support effective distros more than ineffective ones.
	\| <!-- defer -->		\| <!-- defer -->
	~~\| <!-- invalid question -->~~
	~~# Samuel Klein - SL should endorse effective distros while encouraging incomplete ones to improve.~~
	\| <!-- undecided -->		\| <!-- undecided -->
	# Bill Bogstad		# Bill Bogstad
	# Faisal Khan		# Faisal Khan
	# Daniel Drake		# Daniel Drake
	~~# Sean Daly~~
	\|}		\|}

Line 215:		Line 215:
	!width="20%"\| Yes		!width="20%"\| Yes
	!width="20%"\| No		!width="20%"\| No
	~~!width="20%"\| Defer~~
	!width="20%"\| Invalid		!width="20%"\| Invalid
			!width="10%"\| Defer
	! Undecided		! Undecided
	\|-		\|-
	\| <!-- yes -->		\| <!-- yes -->
	# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000045.html Sean Daly] ~~More specifically,~~ SL should reserve the right to determine which distro to associate with ~~"Sugar on a Stick"~~, today Fedora, but possibly another ~~in future~~. ~~To avoid disorganization, I propose that this choice be formalized, perhaps with annually scheduled SLOBs decisions, or sooner under certain conditions~~		# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000045.html Sean Daly] <small>SL should reserve the right to determine which distro to associate with SOAS, today Fedora, but possibly another later.</small>
	# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]		# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]
	# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000154.html Tabitha Roder]		# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000154.html Tabitha Roder]
Line 229:		Line 229:
	# Caryl Bigenho		# Caryl Bigenho
	# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000289.html Benjamin M. Schwartz] - use a more specific name		# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000289.html Benjamin M. Schwartz] - use a more specific name
			\| <!-- invalid question -->
			# Samuel Klein - Too specific. Avoid being confusing; SOAS could still refer to a branded line of 'sticks'.
	\| <!-- defer -->		\| <!-- defer -->
	~~\| <!-- invalid question -->~~
	~~# Samuel Klein - Too specific. There is consensus that the SL community should avoid being confusing. SOAS could still refer to a line of 'sticks'.~~
	\| <!-- undecided -->		\| <!-- undecided -->
	# Bill Bogstad		# Bill Bogstad