Oversight Board/2009/Meeting Minutes-2009-12-23 - Revision history

Cjl: moved Oversight Board/Meeting Minutes-2009-12-23 to Oversight Board/2009/Meeting Minutes-2009-12-23

2011-03-02T03:46:27Z

moved Oversight Board/Meeting Minutes-2009-12-23 to Oversight Board/2009/Meeting Minutes-2009-12-23

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:46, 1 March 2011
(No difference)

Cjl: /* Log */

2011-03-02T03:45:58Z

Log

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:45, 1 March 2011
Line 54:		Line 54:
	== Log ==		== Log ==

	[[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Log-2009-12-23\|Meeting Log]]		[[Oversight_Board/2009/Meeting_Log-2009-12-23\|Meeting Log]]

	[[Category:Oversight board]]		[[Category:Oversight board]]
	[[Category:Meeting minutes]]		[[Category:Meeting minutes]]
	[[Category:Decision panels]]		[[Category:Decision panels]]

FGrose at 14:28, 10 July 2010

2010-07-10T14:28:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:28, 10 July 2010
Line 57:		Line 57:

	[[Category:Oversight board]]		[[Category:Oversight board]]
	~~[[Category:Meetings]]~~
	[[Category:Meeting minutes]]		[[Category:Meeting minutes]]
	[[Category:Decision panels]]		[[Category:Decision panels]]

Cjl: moved Walter is a wanker 13/Meeting Minutes-2009-12-23 to Oversight Board/Meeting Minutes-2009-12-23 over redirect: revert

2010-02-25T00:01:40Z

moved Walter is a wanker 13/Meeting Minutes-2009-12-23 to Oversight Board/Meeting Minutes-2009-12-23 over redirect: revert

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:01, 24 February 2010
(No difference)

Faggot: moved Oversight Board/Meeting Minutes-2009-12-23 to Walter is a wanker 13/Meeting Minutes-2009-12-23: Walter is a wanker

2010-02-24T23:52:42Z

moved Oversight Board/Meeting Minutes-2009-12-23 to Walter is a wanker 13/Meeting Minutes-2009-12-23: Walter is a wanker

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:52, 24 February 2010
(No difference)

Walter: /* Further discussion of policy for using Sugar trademark */ fixed broken link

2009-12-30T14:01:24Z

Further discussion of policy for using Sugar trademark: fixed broken link

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:01, 30 December 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:
	=== Further discussion of policy for using Sugar trademark ===		=== Further discussion of policy for using Sugar trademark ===

	We had consensus that we wanted to clarify the policy regarding the inclusion of Sugar in products as per Section 2.b. of our [[~~http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/~~Sugar_Labs/Governance/Trademark\|trademark policy]].		We had consensus that we wanted to clarify the policy regarding the inclusion of Sugar in products as per Section 2.b. of our [[Sugar_Labs/Governance/Trademark\|trademark policy]].

	'''MOTION 1:''' Add "For example, "MyDistro, sweetened by Sugar" or other "<product>, <joined with> Sugar" language would be a use that does not require permission" to trademark policy Section 2.b.		'''MOTION 1:''' Add "For example, "MyDistro, sweetened by Sugar" or other "<product>, <joined with> Sugar" language would be a use that does not require permission" to trademark policy Section 2.b.

Walter: /* Further discussion of policy for using Sugar trademark */

2009-12-23T16:28:25Z

Further discussion of policy for using Sugar trademark

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:28, 23 December 2009
Line 30:		Line 30:
	:'''<cjb>''' ... Note that "Foo" must be being used more prominently than "Sugar" in advertising materials in this case."		:'''<cjb>''' ... Note that "Foo" must be being used more prominently than "Sugar" in advertising materials in this case."

	We also discussed the confusion regarding Section 5.a., which refers to Sugar on a Stick ("You may produce and distribute Sugar Labs software on a USB key and refer to it as 'Sugar on a Stick'"), in respect to [[~~http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/~~Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-12-18#Resolve_outstanding_Sugar_on_a_Stick_decision_.28Q3.29\|Motion 2]] from last week, where we state "'Sugar on a Stick' should be reserved by Sugar Labs for use by the SoaS-Fedora distribution so that Sugar can be marketed effectively".		We also discussed the confusion regarding Section 5.a., which refers to Sugar on a Stick ("You may produce and distribute Sugar Labs software on a USB key and refer to it as 'Sugar on a Stick'"), in respect to [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-12-18#Resolve_outstanding_Sugar_on_a_Stick_decision_.28Q3.29\|Motion 2]] from last week, where we state "'Sugar on a Stick' should be reserved by Sugar Labs for use by the SoaS-Fedora distribution so that Sugar can be marketed effectively".

	=== Guidelines re transactions with the SFC ===		=== Guidelines re transactions with the SFC ===

Walter: Created page with 'In attendance: SLOB members: walter, tomeu, cjb. bernie Some community members (including satellit, bemasc) attended the meeting. == Agenda == # Further discussion of policy f…'

2009-12-23T16:27:35Z

Created page with 'In attendance: SLOB members: walter, tomeu, cjb. bernie Some community members (including satellit, bemasc) attended the meeting. == Agenda == # Further discussion of policy f…'

New page

In attendance:

SLOB members: walter, tomeu, cjb. bernie

Some community members (including satellit, bemasc) attended the meeting.

== Agenda ==
# Further discussion of policy for using Sugar trademark
# Guidelines re transactions with the SFC
# Infrastructure proposal

=== Further discussion of policy for using Sugar trademark ===

We had consensus that we wanted to clarify the policy regarding the inclusion of Sugar in products as per Section 2.b. of our [[http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Governance/Trademark|trademark policy]].

'''MOTION 1:''' Add "For example, "MyDistro, sweetened by Sugar" or other "<product>, <joined with> Sugar" language would be a use that does not require permission" to trademark policy Section 2.b.

The motion was seconded and we agreed to open discussion on the lists and bring it to vote at the next meeting.

We also discussed the confusing language throughout Section 2.

:'''<bemasc>''' It looks like the whole trademark policy was just a string interpolation
:'''<bemasc>''' based on organizations whose name is the same as the name of their product
:'''<cjb>''' I think there are two choices:
:'''<cjb>''' either change "Sugar Labs" to "Sugar" in most places, or
:'''<cjb>''' change "Sugar Labs" to "the Sugar Labs marks" in most places

And we discussed making more explicit the requirement to keep the Sugar Labs mark secondary in advertising materials, as per Section 4.

:'''<cjb>''' ... Note that "Foo" must be being used more prominently than "Sugar" in advertising materials in this case."

We also discussed the confusion regarding Section 5.a., which refers to Sugar on a Stick ("You may produce and distribute Sugar Labs software on a USB key and refer to it as 'Sugar on a Stick'"), in respect to [[http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-12-18#Resolve_outstanding_Sugar_on_a_Stick_decision_.28Q3.29|Motion 2]] from last week, where we state "'Sugar on a Stick' should be reserved by Sugar Labs for use by the SoaS-Fedora distribution so that Sugar can be marketed effectively".

=== Guidelines re transactions with the SFC ===

We did not discuss [[Sugar_Labs/Governance/Transactions]].

=== Infrastructure proposal ===

We did not discuss Bernie's infrastructure proposal.

=== Other business ===

:'''<cjb>''' I'd like to get a better idea of our finances
:'''<cjb>''' the last ledger from Bradley was pretty confusing to me
:'''<walterbender>''' cjb: I am acting finance director :(
:'''<cjb>''' do you think you could try and come up with a "this is how much money is in our account and spendable on new items" number for next week?
:'''<walterbender>''' cjb: I'll try.

== Next meeting ==

Wednesday, 30 December 2009 15:00 UTC

== Log ==

[[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Log-2009-12-23|Meeting Log]]

[[Category:Oversight board]]
[[Category:Meetings]]
[[Category:Meeting minutes]]
[[Category:Decision panels]]