Oversight Board/Deployment Survey 2015 - Revision history

FGrose: FGrose moved page Oversight Board/Deployment Survey2015 to Oversight Board/Deployment Survey 2015 without leaving a redirect: deCamelCase

2015-06-04T14:37:03Z

FGrose moved page Oversight Board/Deployment Survey2015 to Oversight Board/Deployment Survey 2015 without leaving a redirect: deCamelCase

← Older revision	Revision as of 10:37, 4 June 2015
(No difference)

FGrose: FGrose moved page Oversight Board/DeploymentSurvey2015 to Oversight Board/Deployment Survey2015: deCamelCase

2015-06-04T14:35:24Z

FGrose moved page Oversight Board/DeploymentSurvey2015 to Oversight Board/Deployment Survey2015: deCamelCase

← Older revision	Revision as of 10:35, 4 June 2015
(No difference)

Godiard at 11:56, 4 June 2015

2015-06-04T11:56:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:56, 4 June 2015
Line 25:		Line 25:
	== Older versions ==		== Older versions ==

	Version 1.0 [[File:~~http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/images/4/48/~~Survey_summary.pdf]]		Version 1.0 [[File:Survey_summary.pdf]]

Godiard at 11:56, 4 June 2015

2015-06-04T11:56:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:56, 4 June 2015
Line 21:		Line 21:

	This is the summary version 1.1, if more replies are received, this page will be updated.		This is the summary version 1.1, if more replies are received, this page will be updated.


			== Older versions ==

			Version 1.0 [[File:http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/images/4/48/Survey_summary.pdf]]

Quozl: wording fixes

2015-06-02T00:41:43Z

wording fixes

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:41, 1 June 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Introduction ==		== Introduction ==

	With the objective of get more information about deployments to help us evaluate alternatives for future developments at SugarLabs, the SLOBs ~~run~~ a		With the objective to get more information about deployments to help us evaluate alternatives for future developments at SugarLabs, the SLOBs ran a survey at the beginning of 2015.
	survey at the beginning of 2015.

	The questions were ~~send~~ by email, and we received 15 replies, with information about 21 deployments (some respondents are involved in more than one deployment). ~~Then the~~ first conclusion is that we need improve our communication with the deployments, but the results are representative enough. In particular, we couldn’t communicate with some of the biggest deployments.		The questions were sent by email, and we received 15 replies, with information about 21 deployments (some respondents are involved in more than one deployment). The first conclusion is that we need to improve our communication with the deployments, but the results are representative enough. In particular, we couldn’t communicate with some of the biggest deployments.

	The questions we ~~send~~ were:		The questions we sent were:

	* Describe the actual population using Sugar in your deployment (number of people, public/private schools, ages, etc.)		* Describe the actual population using Sugar in your deployment (number of people, public/private schools, ages, etc.)
Line 21:		Line 20:
	The replies received are compiled here [[File:Deploy_survey_2015_summary-v1.1.pdf]]		The replies received are compiled here [[File:Deploy_survey_2015_summary-v1.1.pdf]]

	This is the summary version 1.1, if more replies are received, will be updated.		This is the summary version 1.1, if more replies are received, this page will be updated.

Godiard: /* Results */

2015-06-01T22:28:30Z

Results

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:28, 1 June 2015
Line 19:		Line 19:
	== Results ==		== Results ==

	The replies received are compiled here [File:Deploy_survey_2015_summary-v1.1.pdf]		The replies received are compiled here [[File:Deploy_survey_2015_summary-v1.1.pdf]]

	This is the summary version 1.1, if more replies are received, will be updated.		This is the summary version 1.1, if more replies are received, will be updated.

Godiard: /* Introduction */

2015-06-01T22:27:34Z

Introduction

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:27, 1 June 2015
Line 16:		Line 16:
	* What are your plans to the future one/two years, with respect to the use of Sugar?		* What are your plans to the future one/two years, with respect to the use of Sugar?
	* Would you pay for support or services? What type of work would be needed by you?		* Would you pay for support or services? What type of work would be needed by you?

			== Results ==

			The replies received are compiled here [File:Deploy_survey_2015_summary-v1.1.pdf]

			This is the summary version 1.1, if more replies are received, will be updated.

Godiard: /* Introduction */

2015-06-01T22:18:50Z

Introduction

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:18, 1 June 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Introduction ==		== Introduction ==

	With the objective		With the objective of get more information about deployments to help us evaluate alternatives for future developments at SugarLabs, the SLOBs run a
	of get more information about deployments to help us evaluate
	alternatives for future developments at SugarLabs, the SLOBs run a
	survey at the beginning of 2015.		survey at the beginning of 2015.

	The questions were		The questions were send by email, and we received 15 replies, with information about 21 deployments (some respondents are involved in more than one deployment). Then the first conclusion is that we need improve our communication with the deployments, but the results are representative enough. In particular, we couldn’t communicate with some of the biggest deployments.
	send by email, and we received 15 replies, with information about 21
	deployments (some respondents are involved in more than one
	deployment). Then the first conclusion is that we need improve our
	communication with the deployments, but the results are
	representative enough. In particular, we couldn’t communicate with
	some of the biggest deployments.

	The questions we		The questions we send were:
	send were:

	*Describe the		* Describe the actual population using Sugar in your deployment (number of people, public/private schools, ages, etc.)
	actual population using Sugar in your deployment (number of people,		* Projections for the next year(s): number of schools (teachers & students), platform (hw&sw)
	public/private schools, ages, etc.)		* What type of communication do you have with SugarLabs?
	*Projections		* What is the level of satisfaction with the use of Sugar and activities in your deployment.
	for the next year(s): number of schools (teachers & students),		* What are the main issues you find in the use of Sugar and Activities in your deployment.
	platform (hw&sw)		* Are other options of hardware/software in use in your deployment right now?
	*What type of		* What are your plans to the future one/two years, with respect to the use of Sugar?
	communication do you have with SugarLabs?		* Would you pay for support or services? What type of work would be needed by you?
	*What is the
	level of satisfaction with the use of Sugar and activities in your
	deployment.
	*What are the
	main issues you find in the use of Sugar and Activities in your
	deployment.
	*Are other
	options of hardware/software in use in your deployment right now?
	*What are your
	plans to the future one/two years, with respect to the use of Sugar?
	*Would you pay
	for support or services? What type of work would be needed by you?

Godiard: New version

2015-06-01T22:16:35Z

New version

New page

== Introduction ==

With the objective
of get more information about deployments to help us evaluate
alternatives for future developments at SugarLabs, the SLOBs run a
survey at the beginning of 2015.

The questions were
send by email, and we received 15 replies, with information about 21
deployments (some respondents are involved in more than one
deployment). Then the first conclusion is that we need improve our
communication with the deployments, but the results are
representative enough. In particular, we couldn’t communicate with
some of the biggest deployments.

The questions we
send were:

*Describe the
actual population using Sugar in your deployment (number of people,
public/private schools, ages, etc.)
*Projections
for the next year(s): number of schools (teachers & students),
platform (hw&sw)
*What type of
communication do you have with SugarLabs?
*What is the
level of satisfaction with the use of Sugar and activities in your
deployment.
*What are the
main issues you find in the use of Sugar and Activities in your
deployment.
*Are other
options of hardware/software in use in your deployment right now?
*What are your
plans to the future one/two years, with respect to the use of Sugar?
*Would you pay
for support or services? What type of work would be needed by you?