Talk:Infrastructure Team - Revision history

Cjl: moved Talk:Walter is a wanker 11 to Talk:Infrastructure Team over redirect: revert

2010-02-25T00:13:54Z

moved Talk:Walter is a wanker 11 to Talk:Infrastructure Team over redirect: revert

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:13, 24 February 2010
(No difference)

Faggot: moved Talk:Infrastructure Team to Talk:Walter is a wanker 11: Walter is a wanker

2010-02-24T23:51:17Z

moved Talk:Infrastructure Team to Talk:Walter is a wanker 11: Walter is a wanker

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:51, 24 February 2010
(No difference)

FGrose: Talk:InfrastructureTeam moved to Talk:Infrastructure Team: deCamel casing

2009-03-17T21:01:59Z

Talk:InfrastructureTeam moved to Talk:Infrastructure Team: deCamel casing

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:01, 17 March 2009
(No difference)

Bernie at 16:58, 10 November 2008

2008-11-10T16:58:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:58, 10 November 2008
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:Yes, from a distro packaging perspective I'd rather see src.s.o go to the place you download tarballs, so I vote for git.s.o too. --[[User:Morgs\|Morgs]] 12:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC)		:Yes, from a distro packaging perspective I'd rather see src.s.o go to the place you download tarballs, so I vote for git.s.o too. --[[User:Morgs\|Morgs]] 12:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

	:: Ok, I changed it to git.sugarlabs.org. [[User:Bernie\|bernie]] 16:58, 10 November 2008 (UTC)		:: Ok, I changed it to git.sugarlabs.org. --[[User:Bernie\|bernie]] 16:58, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

	Re www.sugarlabs.org, we have a splash page designed by Christian Schmidt. We should install it.<br/>		Re www.sugarlabs.org, we have a splash page designed by Christian Schmidt. We should install it.<br/>
Line 10:		Line 10:
	: I think the idea of blog was not to be an aggregator, but an official SL blog. I wonder if Walter blog cover that now anyway, since he is officially ED.		: I think the idea of blog was not to be an aggregator, but an official SL blog. I wonder if Walter blog cover that now anyway, since he is officially ED.

	:: +1, although I'm prepared to install wordpress-mp if individual developers want to use it for their personal blogs [[User:Bernie\|bernie]] 16:58, 10 November 2008 (UTC)		:: +1, although I'm prepared to install wordpress-mp if individual developers want to use it for their personal blogs --[[User:Bernie\|bernie]] 16:58, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Bernie at 16:58, 10 November 2008

2008-11-10T16:58:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:58, 10 November 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:Yes, from a distro packaging perspective I'd rather see src.s.o go to the place you download tarballs, so I vote for git.s.o too. --[[User:Morgs\|Morgs]] 12:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC)		:Yes, from a distro packaging perspective I'd rather see src.s.o go to the place you download tarballs, so I vote for git.s.o too. --[[User:Morgs\|Morgs]] 12:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

			:: Ok, I changed it to git.sugarlabs.org. [[User:Bernie\|bernie]] 16:58, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

	Re www.sugarlabs.org, we have a splash page designed by Christian Schmidt. We should install it.<br/>		Re www.sugarlabs.org, we have a splash page designed by Christian Schmidt. We should install it.<br/>
Line 7:		Line 9:

	: I think the idea of blog was not to be an aggregator, but an official SL blog. I wonder if Walter blog cover that now anyway, since he is officially ED.		: I think the idea of blog was not to be an aggregator, but an official SL blog. I wonder if Walter blog cover that now anyway, since he is officially ED.

			:: +1, although I'm prepared to install wordpress-mp if individual developers want to use it for their personal blogs [[User:Bernie\|bernie]] 16:58, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Marcopg at 14:05, 10 November 2008

2008-11-10T14:05:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:05, 10 November 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Re www.sugarlabs.org, we have a splash page designed by Christian Schmidt. We should install it.<br/>		Re www.sugarlabs.org, we have a splash page designed by Christian Schmidt. We should install it.<br/>
	Re blog.sugarlabs.org, isn't this obsolesced by planet.sugarlabs.org? --[[User:Walter\|Walter]] 12:27, 10 November 2008 (UTC)		Re blog.sugarlabs.org, isn't this obsolesced by planet.sugarlabs.org? --[[User:Walter\|Walter]] 12:27, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

			: I think the idea of blog was not to be an aggregator, but an official SL blog. I wonder if Walter blog cover that now anyway, since he is officially ED.

Walter at 12:27, 10 November 2008

2008-11-10T12:27:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:27, 10 November 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:Yes, from a distro packaging perspective I'd rather see src.s.o go to the place you download tarballs, so I vote for git.s.o too. --[[User:Morgs\|Morgs]] 12:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC)		:Yes, from a distro packaging perspective I'd rather see src.s.o go to the place you download tarballs, so I vote for git.s.o too. --[[User:Morgs\|Morgs]] 12:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

			Re www.sugarlabs.org, we have a splash page designed by Christian Schmidt. We should install it.<br/>
			Re blog.sugarlabs.org, isn't this obsolesced by planet.sugarlabs.org? --[[User:Walter\|Walter]] 12:27, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Morgs at 12:20, 10 November 2008

2008-11-10T12:20:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:20, 10 November 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Not fully convinced about src. I'd rather use a non abbreviated form but... Sources can refer also to source tarballs, maybe it would be better to use something less ambiguous like git or gitorious. --Marcopg		Not fully convinced about src. I'd rather use a non abbreviated form but... Sources can refer also to source tarballs, maybe it would be better to use something less ambiguous like git or gitorious. --Marcopg

			:Yes, from a distro packaging perspective I'd rather see src.s.o go to the place you download tarballs, so I vote for git.s.o too. --[[User:Morgs\|Morgs]] 12:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Marcopg at 12:12, 10 November 2008

2008-11-10T12:12:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:12, 10 November 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Not fully convinced about src. I'd rather use a non abbreviated form but... Sources can refer also to source tarballs, maybe it would be better to use something less ambiguous like git or gitorious.		Not fully convinced about src. I'd rather use a non abbreviated form but... Sources can refer also to source tarballs, maybe it would be better to use something less ambiguous like git or gitorious. --Marcopg

Marcopg: New page: Not fully convinced about src. I'd rather use a non abbreviated form but... Sources can refer also to source tarballs, maybe it would be better to use something less ambiguous like git or ...

2008-11-10T12:11:51Z

New page: Not fully convinced about src. I'd rather use a non abbreviated form but... Sources can refer also to source tarballs, maybe it would be better to use something less ambiguous like git or ...

New page

Not fully convinced about src. I'd rather use a non abbreviated form but... Sources can refer also to source tarballs, maybe it would be better to use something less ambiguous like git or gitorious.