Talk:Interactive Worksheets - Revision history

Mabbikeel at 22:53, 2 April 2009

2009-04-02T22:53:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:53, 2 April 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:

	OK, but they're heavy-duty math folks. I doubt that sugarizing is a priority for them, it could be for us if you convinced us it would be a good experience for kids. Sage is awesome, btw. [[User:Homunq\|Homunq]] 18:17, 2 April 2009 (UTC)		OK, but they're heavy-duty math folks. I doubt that sugarizing is a priority for them, it could be for us if you convinced us it would be a good experience for kids. Sage is awesome, btw. [[User:Homunq\|Homunq]] 18:17, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

			I see - Sage is not really a child-friendly experience. It would be good to get some of that power, but it's such a massive collection of functionality, I imagine a lot of it wouldn't be needed. I think the best idea could be to keep the code to the developers, and having a reader mode, so the student experience is that of a rendered page. I'll try and think about all this and polish up the proposal before the deadline. [[User:Mabbikeel\|mabbikeel]] 22:53, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Homunq at 18:18, 2 April 2009

2009-04-02T18:18:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:18, 2 April 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I'll take a look at Sage. Maybe I should be thinking about working with them instead. [[User:Mabbikeel\|mabbikeel]] 22:05, 1 April 2009 (UTC)		I'll take a look at Sage. Maybe I should be thinking about working with them instead. [[User:Mabbikeel\|mabbikeel]] 22:05, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

	OK, but they're heavy-duty math folks. I doubt that sugarizing is a priority for them, it could be for us if you convinced us it would be a good experience for kids. [[User:Homunq\|Homunq]] 18:17, 2 April 2009 (UTC)		OK, but they're heavy-duty math folks. I doubt that sugarizing is a priority for them, it could be for us if you convinced us it would be a good experience for kids. Sage is awesome, btw. [[User:Homunq\|Homunq]] 18:17, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Homunq at 18:17, 2 April 2009

2009-04-02T18:17:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:17, 2 April 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I'll take a look at Sage. Maybe I should be thinking about working with them instead. [[User:Mabbikeel\|mabbikeel]] 22:05, 1 April 2009 (UTC)		I'll take a look at Sage. Maybe I should be thinking about working with them instead. [[User:Mabbikeel\|mabbikeel]] 22:05, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

			OK, but they're heavy-duty math folks. I doubt that sugarizing is a priority for them, it could be for us if you convinced us it would be a good experience for kids. [[User:Homunq\|Homunq]] 18:17, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Homunq: Talk:Summer of Code/2009/Interactive Worksheets moved to Talk:Interactive Worksheets: See Category:2009_GSoC_applications.

2009-04-02T15:54:47Z

Talk:Summer of Code/2009/Interactive Worksheets moved to Talk:Interactive Worksheets: See Category:2009_GSoC_applications.

← Older revision	Revision as of 11:54, 2 April 2009
(No difference)

Dfarning: Talk:InteractiveWorksheets moved to Talk:Summer of Code/2009/Interactive Worksheets: decamelcase

2009-04-01T22:25:12Z

Talk:InteractiveWorksheets moved to Talk:Summer of Code/2009/Interactive Worksheets: decamelcase

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:25, 1 April 2009
(No difference)

Mabbikeel at 22:05, 1 April 2009

2009-04-01T22:05:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:05, 1 April 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	How would your proposal differ from just packaging a web view of a locally-run copy of Sage, as a sugar activity? (If the answer is "not at all", that's fine, but you should say that.) [[User:Homunq\|Homunq]] 21:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC)		How would your proposal differ from just packaging a web view of a locally-run copy of Sage, as a sugar activity? (If the answer is "not at all", that's fine, but you should say that.) [[User:Homunq\|Homunq]] 21:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

			I'll take a look at Sage. Maybe I should be thinking about working with them instead. [[User:Mabbikeel\|mabbikeel]] 22:05, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Homunq at 21:12, 1 April 2009

2009-04-01T21:12:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:12, 1 April 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	How would your proposal differ from just packaging a web view of a locally-run copy of Sage, as a sugar activity? (If the answer is "not at all", that's ~~great~~, you should say that.) [[User:Homunq\|Homunq]] 21:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC)		How would your proposal differ from just packaging a web view of a locally-run copy of Sage, as a sugar activity? (If the answer is "not at all", that's fine, but you should say that.) [[User:Homunq\|Homunq]] 21:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Homunq at 21:09, 1 April 2009

2009-04-01T21:09:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:09, 1 April 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	How would your proposal differ from just packaging a web view of Sage as a sugar activity? (If the answer is "not at all", that's great, you should say that.) [[User:Homunq\|Homunq]] 21:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC)		How would your proposal differ from just packaging a web view of a locally-run copy of Sage, as a sugar activity? (If the answer is "not at all", that's great, you should say that.) [[User:Homunq\|Homunq]] 21:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Homunq at 21:09, 1 April 2009

2009-04-01T21:09:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:09, 1 April 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	How would your proposal differ from just packaging a web view of Sage as a sugar activity? (If the answer is "not at all", that's great, you should say that.)		How would your proposal differ from just packaging a web view of Sage as a sugar activity? (If the answer is "not at all", that's great, you should say that.) [[User:Homunq\|Homunq]] 21:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Homunq: New page: How would your proposal differ from just packaging a web view of Sage as a sugar activity? (If the answer is "not at all", that's great, you should say that.)

2009-04-01T21:08:57Z

New page: How would your proposal differ from just packaging a web view of Sage as a sugar activity? (If the answer is "not at all", that's great, you should say that.)

New page

How would your proposal differ from just packaging a web view of Sage as a sugar activity? (If the answer is "not at all", that's great, you should say that.)