Talk:Running Linux Applications Under Sugar - Revision history

FGrose: /* It works! */

2012-08-31T14:56:07Z

It works!

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:56, 31 August 2012
Line 49:		Line 49:

	It says in the yellow box that the program won't work on newer versions of sugar but it does. Maybe we should remove this since it might discourage users from trying that idea. My sugar version is 0.96.2 Also I didn't need to restart sugar at the end of sugar coating it immediatly showed up in Home View. --[[User:Jamison Lofthouse\|Jamison Lofthouse]] 10:39, 30 August 2012 (EDT)		It says in the yellow box that the program won't work on newer versions of sugar but it does. Maybe we should remove this since it might discourage users from trying that idea. My sugar version is 0.96.2 Also I didn't need to restart sugar at the end of sugar coating it immediatly showed up in Home View. --[[User:Jamison Lofthouse\|Jamison Lofthouse]] 10:39, 30 August 2012 (EDT)
			: Thanks for testing! If you can improve the page based on your experience, please do so. Thanks. --[[User:FGrose\|FGrose]] 10:56, 31 August 2012 (EDT)

2012-08-30T14:39:52Z

It works!: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:39, 30 August 2012
Line 45:		Line 45:

	Any ideas.		Any ideas.

			== It works! ==

			It says in the yellow box that the program won't work on newer versions of sugar but it does. Maybe we should remove this since it might discourage users from trying that idea. My sugar version is 0.96.2 Also I didn't need to restart sugar at the end of sugar coating it immediatly showed up in Home View. --[[User:Jamison Lofthouse\|Jamison Lofthouse]] 10:39, 30 August 2012 (EDT)

2009-09-17T01:54:53Z

=Sugar Coating= Permission Denied.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:54, 16 September 2009
Line 26:		Line 26:
	It would be helpful if I could copy screen shots to these comments. In any case the final messages for the first two commands on the OLPC were:		It would be helpful if I could copy screen shots to these comments. In any case the final messages for the first two commands on the OLPC were:

	2009-09-16 17:40:49 (39.9 KB/s) - 'libsugarize.so' saved [2792/2792		2009-09-16 17:40:49 (39.9 KB/s) - 'libsugarize.so' saved [2792/2792]

	and		and

	2009-09-16 17:53:32 (43.8 KB/s) - 'sug' saved [3776/3776)		2009-09-16 17:53:32 (43.8 KB/s) - 'sug' saved [3776/3776]

			The response to ./sug was
			bash: ./sug: Permission denied

			For the chmod a+s /bin/chmod

			There was no response except the repeat of the prompt
			bash-3.2#

			Attempting to enter ./sug again was the Permission denied as above.

	It does not appear i can go any further.		It does not appear i can go any further.

	Any ideas.		Any ideas.

2009-09-17T01:46:54Z

=Sugar Coating= Permission Denied.: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:46, 16 September 2009
Line 18:		Line 18:

	[[User:Tinker\|Tinker]] 06:59, 3 February 2009 (UTC)		[[User:Tinker\|Tinker]] 06:59, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

			== =Sugar Coating= Permission Denied. ==

			I was able to download the files described, but when i tried to run ./sug I got a "Permissions Denied" message. Not knowing much Linux, but able to follow directions, I entered chmod a+s /bin/chmod.
			I entered ./sug and i still got Permissions denied.

			It would be helpful if I could copy screen shots to these comments. In any case the final messages for the first two commands on the OLPC were:

			2009-09-16 17:40:49 (39.9 KB/s) - 'libsugarize.so' saved [2792/2792

			and

			2009-09-16 17:53:32 (43.8 KB/s) - 'sug' saved [3776/3776)

			It does not appear i can go any further.

			Any ideas.

2009-02-03T06:59:09Z

Sugar Coating

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:59, 3 February 2009
Line 14:		Line 14:

	The 'sugarize' information should be updated. The information is out of date for 8.2 and refers to an out of date script. By the way scripts were derived from Bernie's I believe. [[User:Tinker\|Tinker]] 04:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)		The 'sugarize' information should be updated. The information is out of date for 8.2 and refers to an out of date script. By the way scripts were derived from Bernie's I believe. [[User:Tinker\|Tinker]] 04:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

			The source for the sugarize.so library is located at: http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=users/albert/sugarize;a=tree;f=xlogo.activity;h=e00f529afbd963a8c7c3321a8cdb71ceace15e46;hb=2acec58d398a169ccadb15d335345624056f80dc

			[[User:Tinker\|Tinker]] 06:59, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

2009-02-02T04:57:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:57, 2 February 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:

	:I believe it's due to the automation. Why isn't this process built into the Sugar Control Panel?? [[User:Graham\|Graham]]		:I believe it's due to the automation. Why isn't this process built into the Sugar Control Panel?? [[User:Graham\|Graham]]

			The 'sugarize' information should be updated. The information is out of date for 8.2 and refers to an out of date script. By the way scripts were derived from Bernie's I believe. [[User:Tinker\|Tinker]] 04:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

2008-05-29T13:31:25Z

Sugar Coating

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:31, 29 May 2008
Line 10:		Line 10:

	[[User:Rmyers\|Rmyers]] 18:22, 26 May 2008 (UTC)		[[User:Rmyers\|Rmyers]] 18:22, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

			:I believe it's due to the automation. Why isn't this process built into the Sugar Control Panel?? [[User:Graham\|Graham]]

2008-05-26T18:22:41Z

questions about 'sugarize.so' 'Sugar Coating'

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:22, 26 May 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Updated information to refer to Sugar Coating.		Updated information to refer to Sugar Coating.


			== Sugar Coating ==
			Where's the source for the sugarize.so library?

			How is this method preferable to already existing and discussed 'sugar coating' methods? Simply automation or other benefits?

			[[User:Rmyers\|Rmyers]] 18:22, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

2008-05-23T01:22:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:22, 22 May 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Can someone verify this information?		Can someone verify this information?

			Updated information to refer to Sugar Coating.

2008-05-22T23:41:30Z

New page: Can someone verify this information?

New page

Can someone verify this information?