Talk:Sugar Labs/Members/List - Revision history

FGrose at 17:11, 24 September 2010

2010-09-24T17:11:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:11, 24 September 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
			== Member definition ==
	A drafty description of "who are members" would be helpful - nothing so formal as a set of criteria, just a basic discussion; and a sense of "if you are like this, you may [ask to/want to] be a member of Sugar Labs". [[User:Sj\|+sj]] [[User Talk:Sj\|<font color="#ff6996">+</font>]] 23:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)		A drafty description of "who are members" would be helpful - nothing so formal as a set of criteria, just a basic discussion; and a sense of "if you are like this, you may [ask to/want to] be a member of Sugar Labs". [[User:Sj\|+sj]] [[User Talk:Sj\|<font color="#ff6996">+</font>]] 23:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
	:From my email: "The criteria I used was in regard to activity on the Sugar and Education mailing lists, contribution to the codebase and to the wiki (and other forms of documentation). I hope to broaden the reach of Sugar Labs membership to include more educators--they are underrepresented." --[[User:Walter\|Walter]] 02:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)		:From my email: "The criteria I used was in regard to activity on the Sugar and Education mailing lists, contribution to the codebase and to the wiki (and other forms of documentation). I hope to broaden the reach of Sugar Labs membership to include more educators--they are underrepresented." --[[User:Walter\|Walter]] 02:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

			== Member wiki page ==
	''Proposal'': let's make the member names links to the user pages [[User:Bernie\|bernie]] 18:16, 26 September 2009 (UTC)		''Proposal'': let's make the member names links to the user pages [[User:Bernie\|bernie]] 18:16, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
			: I second that proposal. Members should be asked to maintain User: page. --[[User:FGrose\|FGrose]] 13:11, 24 September 2010 (EDT)

Bernie at 18:16, 26 September 2009

2009-09-26T18:16:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:16, 26 September 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	A drafty description of "who are members" would be helpful - nothing so formal as a set of criteria, just a basic discussion; and a sense of "if you are like this, you may [ask to/want to] be a member of Sugar Labs". [[User:Sj\|+sj]] [[User Talk:Sj\|<font color="#ff6996">+</font>]] 23:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)		A drafty description of "who are members" would be helpful - nothing so formal as a set of criteria, just a basic discussion; and a sense of "if you are like this, you may [ask to/want to] be a member of Sugar Labs". [[User:Sj\|+sj]] [[User Talk:Sj\|<font color="#ff6996">+</font>]] 23:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
	:From my email: "The criteria I used was in regard to activity on the Sugar and Education mailing lists, contribution to the codebase and to the wiki (and other forms of documentation). I hope to broaden the reach of Sugar Labs membership to include more educators--they are underrepresented." --[[User:Walter\|Walter]] 02:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)		:From my email: "The criteria I used was in regard to activity on the Sugar and Education mailing lists, contribution to the codebase and to the wiki (and other forms of documentation). I hope to broaden the reach of Sugar Labs membership to include more educators--they are underrepresented." --[[User:Walter\|Walter]] 02:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

			''Proposal'': let's make the member names links to the user pages [[User:Bernie\|bernie]] 18:16, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

LFaraone: moved Talk:Sugar Labs/Initial Members List to Talk:Sugar Labs/Members/List: more accurately reflect contents

2009-08-24T23:13:36Z

moved Talk:Sugar Labs/Initial Members List to Talk:Sugar Labs/Members/List: more accurately reflect contents

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:13, 24 August 2009
(No difference)

Dfarning: fix camelcase links

2009-04-08T19:51:48Z

fix camelcase links

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:51, 8 April 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	A drafty description of "who are members" would be helpful - nothing so formal as a set of criteria, just a basic discussion; and a sense of "if you are like this, you may [ask to/want to] be a member of ~~sugarlabs~~". [[User:Sj\|+sj]] [[User Talk:Sj\|<font color="#ff6996">+</font>]] 23:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)		A drafty description of "who are members" would be helpful - nothing so formal as a set of criteria, just a basic discussion; and a sense of "if you are like this, you may [ask to/want to] be a member of Sugar Labs". [[User:Sj\|+sj]] [[User Talk:Sj\|<font color="#ff6996">+</font>]] 23:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
	:From my email: "The criteria I used was in regard to activity on the Sugar and Education mailing lists, contribution to the codebase and to the wiki (and other forms of documentation). I hope to broaden the reach of Sugar Labs membership to include more educators--they are underrepresented." --[[User:Walter\|Walter]] 02:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)		:From my email: "The criteria I used was in regard to activity on the Sugar and Education mailing lists, contribution to the codebase and to the wiki (and other forms of documentation). I hope to broaden the reach of Sugar Labs membership to include more educators--they are underrepresented." --[[User:Walter\|Walter]] 02:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Dfarning: Talk:Sugar Labs/initial members list moved to Talk:Sugar Labs/Initial Members List: fix title

2009-04-03T20:49:35Z

Talk:Sugar Labs/initial members list moved to Talk:Sugar Labs/Initial Members List: fix title

← Older revision	Revision as of 16:49, 3 April 2009
(No difference)

Walter at 02:09, 4 July 2008

2008-07-04T02:09:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:09, 3 July 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	A drafty description of "who are members" would be helpful - nothing so formal as a set of criteria, just a basic discussion; and a sense of "if you are like this, you may [ask to/want to] be a member of sugarlabs". [[User:Sj\|+sj]] [[User Talk:Sj\|<font color="#ff6996">+</font>]] 23:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)		A drafty description of "who are members" would be helpful - nothing so formal as a set of criteria, just a basic discussion; and a sense of "if you are like this, you may [ask to/want to] be a member of sugarlabs". [[User:Sj\|+sj]] [[User Talk:Sj\|<font color="#ff6996">+</font>]] 23:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
	:From my email: "The criteria I used was in regard to activity on the Sugar and Education mailing lists, contribution to the codebase and to the wiki (and other forms of documentation). I hope to broaden the reach of Sugar Labs membership to include more educators--they are underrepresented. --[[User:Walter\|Walter]] 02:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)		:From my email: "The criteria I used was in regard to activity on the Sugar and Education mailing lists, contribution to the codebase and to the wiki (and other forms of documentation). I hope to broaden the reach of Sugar Labs membership to include more educators--they are underrepresented." --[[User:Walter\|Walter]] 02:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Walter at 02:09, 4 July 2008

2008-07-04T02:09:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:09, 3 July 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	A drafty description of "who are members" would be helpful - nothing so formal as a set of criteria, just a basic discussion; and a sense of "if you are like this, you may [ask to/want to] be a member of sugarlabs". [[User:Sj\|+sj]] [[User Talk:Sj\|<font color="#ff6996">+</font>]] 23:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)		A drafty description of "who are members" would be helpful - nothing so formal as a set of criteria, just a basic discussion; and a sense of "if you are like this, you may [ask to/want to] be a member of sugarlabs". [[User:Sj\|+sj]] [[User Talk:Sj\|<font color="#ff6996">+</font>]] 23:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
			:From my email: "The criteria I used was in regard to activity on the Sugar and Education mailing lists, contribution to the codebase and to the wiki (and other forms of documentation). I hope to broaden the reach of Sugar Labs membership to include more educators--they are underrepresented. --[[User:Walter\|Walter]] 02:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Sj: New page: A drafty description of "who are members" would be helpful - nothing so formal as a set of criteria, just a basic discussion; and a sense of "if you are like this, you may [ask to/want to]...

2008-07-03T23:21:07Z

New page: A drafty description of "who are members" would be helpful - nothing so formal as a set of criteria, just a basic discussion; and a sense of "if you are like this, you may [ask to/want to]...

New page

A drafty description of "who are members" would be helpful - nothing so formal as a set of criteria, just a basic discussion; and a sense of "if you are like this, you may [ask to/want to] be a member of sugarlabs". [[User:Sj|+sj]] [[User Talk:Sj|<font color="#ff6996">+</font>]] 23:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:11, 24 September 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
			== Member definition ==
	A drafty description of "who are members" would be helpful - nothing so formal as a set of criteria, just a basic discussion; and a sense of "if you are like this, you may [ask to/want to] be a member of Sugar Labs". [[User:Sj\|+sj]] [[User Talk:Sj\|<font color="#ff6996">+</font>]] 23:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)		A drafty description of "who are members" would be helpful - nothing so formal as a set of criteria, just a basic discussion; and a sense of "if you are like this, you may [ask to/want to] be a member of Sugar Labs". [[User:Sj\|+sj]] [[User Talk:Sj\|<font color="#ff6996">+</font>]] 23:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
	:From my email: "The criteria I used was in regard to activity on the Sugar and Education mailing lists, contribution to the codebase and to the wiki (and other forms of documentation). I hope to broaden the reach of Sugar Labs membership to include more educators--they are underrepresented." --[[User:Walter\|Walter]] 02:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)		:From my email: "The criteria I used was in regard to activity on the Sugar and Education mailing lists, contribution to the codebase and to the wiki (and other forms of documentation). I hope to broaden the reach of Sugar Labs membership to include more educators--they are underrepresented." --[[User:Walter\|Walter]] 02:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

			== Member wiki page ==
	''Proposal'': let's make the member names links to the user pages [[User:Bernie\|bernie]] 18:16, 26 September 2009 (UTC)		''Proposal'': let's make the member names links to the user pages [[User:Bernie\|bernie]] 18:16, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
			: I second that proposal. Members should be asked to maintain User: page. --[[User:FGrose\|FGrose]] 13:11, 24 September 2010 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:16, 26 September 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	A drafty description of "who are members" would be helpful - nothing so formal as a set of criteria, just a basic discussion; and a sense of "if you are like this, you may [ask to/want to] be a member of Sugar Labs". [[User:Sj\|+sj]] [[User Talk:Sj\|<font color="#ff6996">+</font>]] 23:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)		A drafty description of "who are members" would be helpful - nothing so formal as a set of criteria, just a basic discussion; and a sense of "if you are like this, you may [ask to/want to] be a member of Sugar Labs". [[User:Sj\|+sj]] [[User Talk:Sj\|<font color="#ff6996">+</font>]] 23:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
	:From my email: "The criteria I used was in regard to activity on the Sugar and Education mailing lists, contribution to the codebase and to the wiki (and other forms of documentation). I hope to broaden the reach of Sugar Labs membership to include more educators--they are underrepresented." --[[User:Walter\|Walter]] 02:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)		:From my email: "The criteria I used was in regard to activity on the Sugar and Education mailing lists, contribution to the codebase and to the wiki (and other forms of documentation). I hope to broaden the reach of Sugar Labs membership to include more educators--they are underrepresented." --[[User:Walter\|Walter]] 02:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

			''Proposal'': let's make the member names links to the user pages [[User:Bernie\|bernie]] 18:16, 26 September 2009 (UTC)