Talk:Sugar Labs/Sugar contributors - Revision history

RafaelOrtiz: though on membership

2008-07-07T19:21:48Z

though on membership

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:21, 7 July 2008
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:::All good questions. We will have a membership committee that will sort through these issues, presumably. My though would be membership would be for the period of involvement, as that is when it would be relevant. Other ideas? --[[User:Walter\|Walter]] 02:12, 4 July 2008 (UTC)		:::All good questions. We will have a membership committee that will sort through these issues, presumably. My though would be membership would be for the period of involvement, as that is when it would be relevant. Other ideas? --[[User:Walter\|Walter]] 02:12, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
	::::For comparison, Ubuntu membership is for a two year period, and can be renewed on demonstration of continued contribution. More details: [https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Membership "Generally, at least two months of visible, significant activity will be required."] [http://www.ubuntu.com/community/processes/newmember Document your work on your home page on the ... Wiki.] --[[User:Morgs\|Morgs]] 08:06, 7 July 2008 (UTC)		::::For comparison, Ubuntu membership is for a two year period, and can be renewed on demonstration of continued contribution. More details: [https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Membership "Generally, at least two months of visible, significant activity will be required."] [http://www.ubuntu.com/community/processes/newmember Document your work on your home page on the ... Wiki.] --[[User:Morgs\|Morgs]] 08:06, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

			::::This could be a way to go, 2 months of continuous contribution for initial membership and renewal/removal of membership though and evaluation of the work done by the volunteer in the year by the membership committee.--[[User:RafaelOrtiz \| RafaelOrtiz]]


	== Transferring credits ==		== Transferring credits ==

Walter: /* Transferring credits */

2008-07-07T17:08:19Z

Transferring credits

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:08, 7 July 2008
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Is transferring of work / commitment / participation portable? i.e., from other OLPC forums, laptop.org or otherwise, to be considered for Sugar Labs membership? [[User:Yamaplos\|Yamaplos]] 17:05, 7 July 2008 (UTC)		Is transferring of work / commitment / participation portable? i.e., from other OLPC forums, laptop.org or otherwise, to be considered for Sugar Labs membership? [[User:Yamaplos\|Yamaplos]] 17:05, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
			:Downstream work that flows upstream should of course transferable!! --[[User:Walter\|Walter]] 17:08, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Yamaplos: /* Transferring credits */ new section

2008-07-07T17:05:38Z

Transferring credits: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:05, 7 July 2008
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:::All good questions. We will have a membership committee that will sort through these issues, presumably. My though would be membership would be for the period of involvement, as that is when it would be relevant. Other ideas? --[[User:Walter\|Walter]] 02:12, 4 July 2008 (UTC)		:::All good questions. We will have a membership committee that will sort through these issues, presumably. My though would be membership would be for the period of involvement, as that is when it would be relevant. Other ideas? --[[User:Walter\|Walter]] 02:12, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
	::::For comparison, Ubuntu membership is for a two year period, and can be renewed on demonstration of continued contribution. More details: [https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Membership "Generally, at least two months of visible, significant activity will be required."] [http://www.ubuntu.com/community/processes/newmember Document your work on your home page on the ... Wiki.] --[[User:Morgs\|Morgs]] 08:06, 7 July 2008 (UTC)		::::For comparison, Ubuntu membership is for a two year period, and can be renewed on demonstration of continued contribution. More details: [https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Membership "Generally, at least two months of visible, significant activity will be required."] [http://www.ubuntu.com/community/processes/newmember Document your work on your home page on the ... Wiki.] --[[User:Morgs\|Morgs]] 08:06, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

			== Transferring credits ==

			Is transferring of work / commitment / participation portable? i.e., from other OLPC forums, laptop.org or otherwise, to be considered for Sugar Labs membership? [[User:Yamaplos\|Yamaplos]] 17:05, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Morgs at 08:06, 7 July 2008

2008-07-07T08:06:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:06, 7 July 2008
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:: [[User:Sj\|+sj]] [[User Talk:Sj\|<font color="#ff6996">+</font>]] 23:23, 3 July 2008 (UTC)		:: [[User:Sj\|+sj]] [[User Talk:Sj\|<font color="#ff6996">+</font>]] 23:23, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
	:::All good questions. We will have a membership committee that will sort through these issues, presumably. My though would be membership would be for the period of involvement, as that is when it would be relevant. Other ideas? --[[User:Walter\|Walter]] 02:12, 4 July 2008 (UTC)		:::All good questions. We will have a membership committee that will sort through these issues, presumably. My though would be membership would be for the period of involvement, as that is when it would be relevant. Other ideas? --[[User:Walter\|Walter]] 02:12, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
			::::For comparison, Ubuntu membership is for a two year period, and can be renewed on demonstration of continued contribution. More details: [https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Membership "Generally, at least two months of visible, significant activity will be required."] [http://www.ubuntu.com/community/processes/newmember Document your work on your home page on the ... Wiki.] --[[User:Morgs\|Morgs]] 08:06, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Walter at 02:12, 4 July 2008

2008-07-04T02:12:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:12, 3 July 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	What about:		What about:
	* through promoting the idea of Sugar or advocating the importance of its target goals?		* through promoting the idea of Sugar or advocating the importance of its target goals?
			:Of course
	* through Review and critique? Is it possible for someone who cares about the work of Sugar Labs but thinks it is all misguided and works hard to change its course to be a member?		* through Review and critique? Is it possible for someone who cares about the work of Sugar Labs but thinks it is all misguided and works hard to change its course to be a member?
			:Only if they contribute their critique.
	Also needing clarification: Is membership for life? If not, how does one renew or lose membership? Is there a process for nomination, or self-nomination? Of course the Committee can deal with this once it is set up. The most important distinction in my mind is whether membership is primarily through self-association and affiliation, through clearly defined heuristics requiring no human intervention (though perhaps with the option of a human veto / membership removal), or through a human approval process.		Also needing clarification: Is membership for life? If not, how does one renew or lose membership? Is there a process for nomination, or self-nomination? Of course the Committee can deal with this once it is set up. The most important distinction in my mind is whether membership is primarily through self-association and affiliation, through clearly defined heuristics requiring no human intervention (though perhaps with the option of a human veto / membership removal), or through a human approval process.
	:: [[User:Sj\|+sj]] [[User Talk:Sj\|<font color="#ff6996">+</font>]] 23:23, 3 July 2008 (UTC)		:: [[User:Sj\|+sj]] [[User Talk:Sj\|<font color="#ff6996">+</font>]] 23:23, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
			:::All good questions. We will have a membership committee that will sort through these issues, presumably. My though would be membership would be for the period of involvement, as that is when it would be relevant. Other ideas? --[[User:Walter\|Walter]] 02:12, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Sj at 23:26, 3 July 2008

2008-07-03T23:26:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:26, 3 July 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:
	* through promoting the idea of Sugar or advocating the importance of its target goals?		* through promoting the idea of Sugar or advocating the importance of its target goals?
	* through Review and critique? Is it possible for someone who cares about the work of Sugar Labs but thinks it is all misguided and works hard to change its course to be a member?		* through Review and critique? Is it possible for someone who cares about the work of Sugar Labs but thinks it is all misguided and works hard to change its course to be a member?

			Also needing clarification: Is membership for life? If not, how does one renew or lose membership? Is there a process for nomination, or self-nomination? Of course the Committee can deal with this once it is set up. The most important distinction in my mind is whether membership is primarily through self-association and affiliation, through clearly defined heuristics requiring no human intervention (though perhaps with the option of a human veto / membership removal), or through a human approval process.
	:: [[User:Sj\|+sj]] [[User Talk:Sj\|<font color="#ff6996">+</font>]] 23:23, 3 July 2008 (UTC)		:: [[User:Sj\|+sj]] [[User Talk:Sj\|<font color="#ff6996">+</font>]] 23:23, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Sj: additional thoughts

2008-07-03T23:23:11Z

additional thoughts

New page

What about:
* through promoting the idea of Sugar or advocating the importance of its target goals?
* through Review and critique? Is it possible for someone who cares about the work of Sugar Labs but thinks it is all misguided and works hard to change its course to be a member?
:: [[User:Sj|+sj]] [[User Talk:Sj|<font color="#ff6996">+</font>]] 23:23, 3 July 2008 (UTC)