Wiki Team/Roadmap/Use Cases - Revision history

FGrose at 17:56, 18 May 2010

2010-05-18T17:56:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:56, 18 May 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:
	It would operate in a manner similar to the table of contents, but without the restriction of using the headers as links and without the shifting of context away from the current view of the page.		It would operate in a manner similar to the table of contents, but without the restriction of using the headers as links and without the shifting of context away from the current view of the page.
	==WYSIWYG/M editor==		==WYSIWYG/M editor==
	Having an easy-to-use editor to alternate with MediaWiki markup would enable more people to edit comfortably in the wiki. The leading extension under development seems to be [[mediawikiwiki:Extension:FCKeditor_(Official)]]. One should review the discussion page, [[mediawikiwiki:Extension_talk:FCKeditor_(Official)]].		Having an easy-to-use editor to alternate with MediaWiki markup would enable more people to edit comfortably in the wiki.
			* The leading extension under development seems to be [[mediawikiwiki:Extension:FCKeditor_(Official)]].
			* One should review the discussion page, [[mediawikiwiki:Extension_talk:FCKeditor_(Official)]].
			* Recent news on development difficulties, http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/mediawiki-l/2010-May/034055.html
	===When should we implement?===		===When should we implement?===
	Joining a development project too soon can lead to diversion of resources to support incomplete applications. For example, as of September 2009, the FCKeditor extension [[mediawikiwiki:Extension_talk:FCKeditor_(Official)#No_go_on_1.15\|fails to support MediaWiki 1.15.1]], our current version.		Joining a development project too soon can lead to diversion of resources to support incomplete applications. For example, as of September 2009, the FCKeditor extension [[mediawikiwiki:Extension_talk:FCKeditor_(Official)#No_go_on_1.15\|fails to support MediaWiki 1.15.1]], our current version.

FGrose at 05:18, 12 March 2010

2010-03-12T05:18:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:18, 12 March 2010
Line 14:		Line 14:

	==Google Spreadsheet==		==Google Spreadsheet==
	See [[Widget:Google_Spreadsheet]]. Lacks convenient edit link.		See [[Widget:Google_Spreadsheet]]. <s>Lacks convenient edit link.</s> Author has [http://www.mediawikiwidgets.org/Widget_talk:Google_Spreadsheet#Edit_link implemented] this feature in a new release.

	'''Pros'''		'''Pros'''

Cjl: moved Walter is a wanker 15/Roadmap/Use Cases to Wiki Team/Roadmap/Use Cases over redirect: revert

2010-02-24T23:56:54Z

moved Walter is a wanker 15/Roadmap/Use Cases to Wiki Team/Roadmap/Use Cases over redirect: revert

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:56, 24 February 2010
(No difference)

Faggot: moved Wiki Team/Roadmap/Use Cases to Walter is a wanker 15/Roadmap/Use Cases: Walter is a wanker

2010-02-24T23:53:44Z

moved Wiki Team/Roadmap/Use Cases to Walter is a wanker 15/Roadmap/Use Cases: Walter is a wanker

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:53, 24 February 2010
(No difference)

FGrose at 01:58, 8 November 2009

2009-11-08T01:58:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:58, 7 November 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	To make a wiki page more usable with extensive content, collapsible sections enabled through table extensions are available.		To make a wiki page more usable with extensive content, collapsible sections enabled through table extensions are available.

	Trac ticket:{{Bug\|612}} has been entered with links to sources.		Trac ticket:<s>{{Bug\|612}}</s> has been entered with links to sources.

	The advantage of a collapsible section versus a linked page is that the content can be viewed or hidden in the context of the the original page or the opening view of a page. This can be a big advantage when there is surrounding information that helps complete the circumstances for the topic. A use case could be a design review where one wants viewers to see an outline of alternatives on their initial view (in order to set a preview of what is available) and then the viewer may click the expansion toggle to explode or hide the particular content.		The advantage of a collapsible section versus a linked page is that the content can be viewed or hidden in the context of the the original page or the opening view of a page. This can be a big advantage when there is surrounding information that helps complete the circumstances for the topic. A use case could be a design review where one wants viewers to see an outline of alternatives on their initial view (in order to set a preview of what is available) and then the viewer may click the expansion toggle to explode or hide the particular content.

FGrose at 01:46, 8 November 2009

2009-11-08T01:46:00Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==Collapsible table sections==
 To make a wiki page more usable with extensive content, collapsible sections enabled through table extensions are available.
@@ Line 11: / Line 12: @@
 ===When should we implement?===
 Joining a development project too soon can lead to diversion of resources to support incomplete applications.  For example, as of September 2009, the FCKeditor extension [[mediawikiwiki:Extension_talk:FCKeditor_(Official)#No_go_on_1.15|fails to support MediaWiki 1.15.1]], our current version.

FGrose at 04:31, 19 September 2009

2009-09-19T04:31:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:31, 19 September 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Having an easy-to-use editor to alternate with MediaWiki markup would enable more people to edit comfortably in the wiki. The leading extension under development seems to be [[mediawikiwiki:Extension:FCKeditor_(Official)]]. One should review the discussion page, [[mediawikiwiki:Extension_talk:FCKeditor_(Official)]].		Having an easy-to-use editor to alternate with MediaWiki markup would enable more people to edit comfortably in the wiki. The leading extension under development seems to be [[mediawikiwiki:Extension:FCKeditor_(Official)]]. One should review the discussion page, [[mediawikiwiki:Extension_talk:FCKeditor_(Official)]].
	===When should we implement?===		===When should we implement?===
	Joining a development project too soon can lead to diversion of resources to support incomplete applications. For example, as of September 2009, the FCKeditor extension [[mediawikiwiki:Extension_talk:FCKeditor_(Official)#No_go_on_1.15\|fails to support MediaWiki 1.15.1]], our current version~~. Support for alternate browsers probably will be delayed~~.		Joining a development project too soon can lead to diversion of resources to support incomplete applications. For example, as of September 2009, the FCKeditor extension [[mediawikiwiki:Extension_talk:FCKeditor_(Official)#No_go_on_1.15\|fails to support MediaWiki 1.15.1]], our current version.

FGrose at 03:43, 19 September 2009

2009-09-19T03:43:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:43, 18 September 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:

	It would operate in a manner similar to the table of contents, but without the restriction of using the headers as links and without the shifting of context away from the current view of the page.		It would operate in a manner similar to the table of contents, but without the restriction of using the headers as links and without the shifting of context away from the current view of the page.
			==WYSIWYG/M editor==
			Having an easy-to-use editor to alternate with MediaWiki markup would enable more people to edit comfortably in the wiki. The leading extension under development seems to be [[mediawikiwiki:Extension:FCKeditor_(Official)]]. One should review the discussion page, [[mediawikiwiki:Extension_talk:FCKeditor_(Official)]].
			===When should we implement?===
			Joining a development project too soon can lead to diversion of resources to support incomplete applications. For example, as of September 2009, the FCKeditor extension [[mediawikiwiki:Extension_talk:FCKeditor_(Official)#No_go_on_1.15\|fails to support MediaWiki 1.15.1]], our current version. Support for alternate browsers probably will be delayed.

FGrose at 00:01, 1 April 2009

2009-04-01T00:01:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:01, 31 March 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==~~Use Cases~~==		==Collapsible table sections==
			To make a wiki page more usable with extensive content, collapsible sections enabled through table extensions are available.

			Trac ticket:{{Bug\|612}} has been entered with links to sources.

			The advantage of a collapsible section versus a linked page is that the content can be viewed or hidden in the context of the the original page or the opening view of a page. This can be a big advantage when there is surrounding information that helps complete the circumstances for the topic. A use case could be a design review where one wants viewers to see an outline of alternatives on their initial view (in order to set a preview of what is available) and then the viewer may click the expansion toggle to explode or hide the particular content.

			It would operate in a manner similar to the table of contents, but without the restriction of using the headers as links and without the shifting of context away from the current view of the page.

FGrose: New page: ==Use Cases==

2009-03-30T17:41:50Z

New page: ==Use Cases==

New page

==Use Cases==