Decision panels/SOAS: Difference between revisions
→Question 2: flip-flop on further reflection |
→Report on Questions 1-3: prpoed answers |
||
| Line 120: | Line 120: | ||
Question 1: "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?" | Question 1: "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?" | ||
'''Proposed answers:''' | |||
{| border="1" | {| border="1" | ||
| Line 146: | Line 145: | ||
Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?" | Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?" | ||
'''Proposed answers:''' | |||
{| border="1" | {| border="1" | ||
| Line 169: | Line 169: | ||
Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?" | Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?" | ||
'''Proposed answers:''' | |||
{| border="1" | {| border="1" | ||