Difference between revisions of "Features/Sugar Bundles"
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
So if one user uploaded Journal object(any type - activity, activity object, content library etc.) to the web, another user can download/transfer-through-many-non-sugar-environments it and open in his sugar environment with keeping all metadata(he will get the same Journal entry). | So if one user uploaded Journal object(any type - activity, activity object, content library etc.) to the web, another user can download/transfer-through-many-non-sugar-environments it and open in his sugar environment with keeping all metadata(he will get the same Journal entry). | ||
+ | |||
+ | We can also collect users object on public server like ASLO to have server like sharing feature. | ||
== Scope == | == Scope == |
Revision as of 11:39, 27 November 2009
Summary
One file format to transfer various types of content in/out to/from sugar environment with keeping metadata.
Owner
- Name: Aleksey Lim
- Email: send an email
Current status
- Targeted release: 0.88
- Last updated: Wed Nov 25 18:10:45 UTC 2009
- Percentage of completion: 0%
Detailed Description
In fact, this feature is an end users oriented(technically we not invent super format for various types of content, just unified sugar wrapper). Users all time know that there is only one type of sugar objects, they see it as a Journal item, one file with suffix .xo in non-sugar environments etc. So they need only upload this file to Journal and click to activate it.
At present, we have several file types that user can encounter out of sugar:
- activity bundles(.xo)
- content bundles(.xol)
- journal bundles(.xoj)
All these files have different suffixes and after uploading to Journal have different behaviour.
Sugar Bundles are intended to unify object related workflow:
- one type of objects out of sugar - files with .xo suffix
- one type of behaviour after uploading such files to the Journal - you need to click on object in Journal to activate it
So, Sugar Bundles not only changes import/export part of sugar but also change lauch workflow, uploaded objects from .xo files could be:
- activity_id less Journal entries, launch some activity to open this object
- just various files that were created out of sugar
- former Library bundles will be opened in Browse
- Journal entries with activity_id, launch poper activity to open this object
- activities, launch it with newly created object
Benefit to Sugar
Out of sugar environment, users know that there is only one type of sugar objects and only thing they should do to activate them is uploading .xo file to Journal and click it.
So if one user uploaded Journal object(any type - activity, activity object, content library etc.) to the web, another user can download/transfer-through-many-non-sugar-environments it and open in his sugar environment with keeping all metadata(he will get the same Journal entry).
We can also collect users object on public server like ASLO to have server like sharing feature.
Scope
- sugar
- sugar-toolkit
How To Test
Features/Sugar Bundles/Testing
User Experience
Since we have only one type of sugar objects, user all time knows that if there is a file with suffix .xo he can download/open-in-journal it and need only click to activate it in sugar.
Dependencies
Nothing except existed sucrose dependencies.
Contingency Plan
None necessary, revert to previous release behaviour.
Documentation
- Unified Bundles
- Unified Objects
- Journal entry bundles
- Bundle concepts
- MANIFEST specification
- Email threads
Release Notes
The Sugar Release Notes inform end-users about what is new in the release. An Example is 0.84/Notes. The release notes also help users know how to deal with platform changes such as ABIs/APIs, configuration or data file formats, or upgrade concerns. If there are any such changes involved in this feature, indicate them here. You can also link to upstream documentation if it satisfies this need. This information forms the basis of the release notes edited by the release team and shipped with the release.