Changes

Oversight Board/2010/Meeting Log-2010-02-05 (view source)

Revision as of 12:13, 5 February 2010

61 bytes removed , 12:13, 5 February 2010

m

no edit summary

Line 1: Line 1:

:'''tomeu''' hi all!

:'''walterbender''' hi

−

it is about that time :)

+

:it is about that time :)

−

is bernie here?

+

:is bernie here?

−

anyone besides tomeu actually listening?

+

:anyone besides tomeu actually listening?

:'''SeanDaly''' helooo?

:'''walterbender''' do we have quorum? We only have 3 so far

:'''tomeu''' cjb, mchua, CanoeBerry: ping

:'''walterbender''' we can chat in the meantime.

−

I had a long talk with the GeoGebra team this morning...

+

:I had a long talk with the GeoGebra team this morning...

:'''cjb''' morning

:'''walterbender''' They are excited about getting their activity running on Sugar... but it will finally force the issue of getting decent Java support running...

−

ah. quorum...

+

:ah. quorum...

:'''#'''startmeeting

:'''meeting''' Meeting started at 11:05 UTC. The chair is walterbender.

−

Commands Available: #TOPIC, #IDEA, #ACTION, #AGREED, #LINK

+

:Commands Available: #TOPIC, #IDEA, #ACTION, #AGREED, #LINK

:'''walterbender''' A quick roll call:

−

* walterbender here

+

* walterbender:here

−

* SeanDaly here

+

* SeanDaly:here

−

* cjb here

+

* cjb:here

−

* tomeu as well

+

* tomeu:as well

:'''walterbender''' I hope mchua pops in for the GSoC discussion

−

meanwhile, shall we start with the usual: Trademarks?

+

:meanwhile, shall we start with the usual: Trademarks?

:'''#'''topic update on TM discussion

:'''SeanDaly''' I had a message from Joe Raftery, but he edited my wiki page instead of sending a mail, he asked a question but I can't reach him

:'''walterbender''' SeanDaly, cjb: anything worth summarizing from the discussions on the lists?

:'''SeanDaly''' I think there's a concern that the procedure will be complex

−

I think it should be policy for approval to be fast-track for FOSS projects,

+

:I think it should be policy for approval to be fast-track for FOSS projects,

:'''cjb''' walterbender: I think everyone who commented was against the idea that we need more strict trademark rules than the other free software projects we've been comparing ourselves to

:'''SeanDaly''' and deeper review for commercial partners

:'''walterbender''' SeanDaly, cjb: do we have any specific language to propose?

:'''SeanDaly''' well, there were two comments... and no reply to my reply

−

Not today I'm afraid since I was wiped out from l'Atelier OLPC France day (which went very well)

+

:Not today I'm afraid since I was wiped out from l'Atelier OLPC France day (which went very well)

−

But, it's clearer and clearer to me how I think it should work

+

:But, it's clearer and clearer to me how I think it should work

:'''walterbender''' SeanDaly: it is great that the atelier went well...

:'''SeanDaly''' yes I will brief SLOBs on great contacts in separate mail

:'''walterbender''' SeanDaly, cjb: maybe the next step is for the two of you to work together on some new langauge to post to the lists...

:'''SeanDaly''' my pres. appreciated and will be published by OLPC France

−

back on topic: two things

+

:back on topic: two things

:'''walterbender''' SeanDaly: (we need to follow up re Rotary one of these days too.)

:'''SeanDaly''' re other FOSS projects: the only one I'm interested in comparing with is a successful one

−

walterbender: true

+

:walterbender: true

−

Mozilla has been very successful with branding

+

:Mozilla has been very successful with branding

−

However, that doesn't mean we need to carbon copy their policy

+

:However, that doesn't mean we need to carbon copy their policy

−

I'd like to emulate Dolby and Intel, but without the fees

+

:I'd like to emulate Dolby and Intel, but without the fees

:'''walterbender''' SeanDaly cjb: it seems the two of you are representative of the diversity of opinions, so if you can reach consensus, it will prob. be a good position.

:'''SeanDaly''' walterbender: sounds good

:'''cjb''' walterbender: ok

−

not sure what a concrete next step should be, though

+

:not sure what a concrete next step should be, though

:'''walterbender''' would you have time over the next week?

:'''SeanDaly''' second point: in light of my first point, are we sure we never want to charge commercial partners?

:'''cjb''' I'm interested in whether it's possible to use automatic revocation upon non-compliance in trademark licenses

−

but I don't know how to find an answer to that

+

:but I don't know how to find an answer to that

:'''SeanDaly''' cjb: it sure is, but the question is enforcement

:'''walterbender''' cjb: the goal is something simple and inviting for FOSS projects while maintaining some degree of oversight (as required by TM law and by our community standards)

:'''cjb''' SeanDaly: surely if we don't have any enforcement available, it doesn't matter what the policy says?

:'''SeanDaly''' cjb: we do have enforcement

−

~~-->| aniN (~anin@220.225.125.245) has joined #sugar-meeting~~

:'''cjb''' ah. what exactly is the question, then?

:'''SeanDaly''' but just because the law says somebody can't steal a car, I won't leave a car running unattended with the keys in the ignition

Line 68: Line 67:

:'''tomeu''' not sure how well fares the moodle brand, though ;)

:'''SeanDaly''' tomeu: moodle brand not known by public, but well-known among educators by word-of-mouth

−

I believe they have a rather restrictive partner policy: 2 per country

+

:I believe they have a rather restrictive partner policy: 2 per country

:'''cjb''' wow, that is a surprising policy

:'''walterbender''' well, keeping in mind that we need more mindshare from educators...

Line 91: Line 90:

:'''tomeu''' ah, ok

:'''cjb''' maybe they will say "we think automatic trademark licenses don't work and we don't want to use them"

−

and that would be useful to hear

+

:and that would be useful to hear

:'''SeanDaly''' cjb: Karen said: "decide what you want & we will write the language"

−

* tomeu thanks cjb and SeanDaly for taking this unsexy task

+

* tomeu:thanks cjb and SeanDaly for taking this unsexy task

:'''cjb''' ok, we'll work on it :)

:'''walterbender''' #action cjb and SeanDaly will draft some new TM and run it past the community for review.

Line 101: Line 100:

:'''SeanDaly''' cjb: well, a fair policy for FOSS projects with fast-track approval - what's not to like? :D

:'''walterbender''' we are never going to all agree on ever detail, but if we can find something we can all work with productively...

−

let's run through a few other agenda items in the meantime.

+

:let's run through a few other agenda items in the meantime.

:'''SeanDaly''' walterbender: after plain English policy will be legal doc by Karen, so still a ways to go...

:'''walterbender''' SeanDaly: as long as we are moving towards the goal.

−

On a related topic, we have a few new TM requests that have come in this week.

+

:On a related topic, we have a few new TM requests that have come in this week.

:'''SeanDaly''' walterbender: top-of-mind! :D

−

I'm especially interested in openSUSE case

+

:I'm especially interested in openSUSE case

:'''walterbender''' Paraguay would like to use our mark and become some flavor of Sugar Lab...

−

they'd like an agreement from us.

+

:they'd like an agreement from us.

:'''SeanDaly''' we don't have a way of recognizing "official" local labs do we?

−

a procedure even?

+

:a procedure even?

:'''walterbender''' Well, we are somewhat mired at the moment.

−

we had a process in place before the TM debate

+

:we had a process in place before the TM debate

−

but the TM debate seems to superceed it.

+

:but the TM debate seems to superceed it.

:'''SeanDaly''' yes, related...

:'''tomeu''' may be interesting to move forward with SLs argentina, in sight of recent news

Line 130: Line 129:

:'''tomeu''' the article is better than its title

:'''SeanDaly''' this is precisely why I wish to coordinate PR & marketing with OLPC-F and especially OLPC-A

−

I have pinged Rodrigo again

+

:I have pinged Rodrigo again

−

more Sugar, less tech spex

+

:more Sugar, less tech spex

:'''walterbender''' Anyway, I'll let Cecilia know that we are working on something for Paraguay...

−

* lfaraone waves.

+

* lfaraone:waves.

:'''walterbender''' OK. Can we talk about GSoC?

:'''tomeu''' I count on paraguay educa to help other countries work together in sugar

:'''SeanDaly''' walterbender:re expedite requests: I fully agree

−

hey just heard back from Rodrigo - looks like we will start coordinating!!

+

:hey just heard back from Rodrigo - looks like we will start coordinating!!

:'''walterbender''' SeanDaly: great...

:'''tomeu''' about gsoc, I'm personally going to focus my time on other contributors such as from downstreams

:'''walterbender''' #topic gsoc

:'''tomeu''' gsoc students have taken lots of my time in past editions

−

and I'm not sure it was really worth it, compared to other contributors

+

:and I'm not sure it was really worth it, compared to other contributors

:'''mchua''' Do we know what sorts of things we'd want gsoc students to take on this summer? Is this the best use of our time?

:'''cjb''' tomeu: yeah, I see where you're coming from

Line 151: Line 150:

:'''cjb''' well, one nice thing about gsoc is that it forces us to write down stuff we'd like other people to help with

:'''walterbender''' and some students, even if their project is not viable, go on to be community members

−

cjb: yes... it enforces a certain discipline

+

:cjb: yes... it enforces a certain discipline

−

and it is a right of passage for a FOSS project

+

:and it is a right of passage for a FOSS project

−

it keeps us in the broader community eye

+

:it keeps us in the broader community eye

:'''tomeu''' maybe activities would be more appropriate for gsoc?

:'''CanoeBerry''' Apologies for the very late arrival.

:'''walterbender''' for example, just this morning, GeoGebra was talk about getting involved with us on GSoC...

−

hi Adam

+

:hi Adam

:'''CanoeBerry''' Ciao Todos

:'''walterbender''' Adam: need a backlog?

Line 165: Line 164:

:'''walterbender''' I think we tied to tackle projects with too large of a scope last year...

:'''tomeu''' walterbender: +1

−

also, there's a very wide range of experience and capabilities in students

+

:also, there's a very wide range of experience and capabilities in students

:'''walterbender''' but the first step is to decide (1) do we apply this year and (2) is yes, who is the team?

:'''tomeu''' we should match better projects with individuals

Line 174: Line 173:

:'''cjb''' I'd like to see us apply but have frankly no intention of helping. sorry. :)

:'''mchua''' (1) who, if anyone, is interested in leading the sl gsoc charge this year? (2) do we feel comfortable selecting a team/lead from those who volunteered and handing this responsibility to them, pretty much completely?

−

* mchua has no objections to applying, but has no further hands to lend for it this summer.

+

* mchua:has no objections to applying, but has no further hands to lend for it this summer.

:'''walterbender''' I so far have heard from one person... Tim McNamara

:'''cjb''' perhaps we should post to iaep asking for volunteers to lead?

−

there was Jameson (and mchua) last year

+

:there was Jameson (and mchua) last year

:'''walterbender''' cjb: I've asked twice, both times buried on the Sugar Digest

:'''cjb''' ah, sorry.

−

* mchua cleaning up a stub page for that right now, will be ready in ~5m

+

* mchua:cleaning up a stub page for that right now, will be ready in ~5m

:'''cjb''' I do read them :-)

:'''mchua''' Yeah, I saw the mentions but they may have been lost inline for most readers.

:'''walterbender''' cjb: well, it is obvious that I haven't done a good job getting the word out...

−

I'll work with Tim and try to pull in some more help.

+

:I'll work with Tim and try to pull in some more help.

−

mchua: the materials we prepared last year should mostly be relevant for this year.

+

:mchua: the materials we prepared last year should mostly be relevant for this year.

−

* mchua nods.

+

* mchua:nods.

:'''walterbender''' #action Walter to be more aggressive about assembling a team for GSoC

−

Any other suggestions re this topic?

+

:Any other suggestions re this topic?

−

OK. well, I have my action item.

+

:OK. well, I have my action item.

−

The final topic on today's agenda is to review our goals for 2010.

+

:The final topic on today's agenda is to review our goals for 2010.

:'''#'''topic Goals for 2010

−

I wrote a first draft for comment...

+

:I wrote a first draft for comment...

−

* walterbender looks for the URL

+

* walterbender:looks for the URL

:'''CanoeBerry''' Side Comment about Tim McNamara..

−

He's 100% awesome and helping me lead QA back on track.

+

:He's 100% awesome and helping me lead QA back on track.

−

Where we can help.

+

:Where we can help.

−

The Sri Lankan team is very serious.

+

:The Sri Lankan team is very serious.

:'''tomeu''' CanoeBerry: hmm, maybe next development team meeting could be about QA?

:'''walterbender''' http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2010-01-22#Goals_for_2010_2

Line 207: Line 206:

:'''mchua''' CanoeBerry: in fact, please ping iaep

:'''CanoeBerry''' Will do.

−

* tomeu reads proposed goals

+

* tomeu:reads proposed goals

:'''mchua''' walterbender: (note that I set an arbitrary date of feb 17 for announcing interest deadline, so we can pick a coordinator 2 meetings from now)

:'''walterbender''' re goals, they are all pretty generic and not easy to measure...

:'''tomeu''' is it REL or RHEL?

:'''cjb''' it's RHEL

−

pronounced our-hell :)

+

:pronounced our-hell :)

:'''tomeu''' :D

:'''walterbender''' regardless of the spelling, that will be an up-hill battle...

−

not technically, but in terms of the RHEL goals...

+

:not technically, but in terms of the RHEL goals...

:'''mchua''' What can be done to make it easier?

:'''cjb''' yes, similar to the three-year-old battles at OLPC about what the software base would be

−

we rejected RHEL then because we knew we needed newer software than it provides

+

:we rejected RHEL then because we knew we needed newer software than it provides

−

so I don't really understand why we think we might be a good idea now :)

+

:so I don't really understand why we think we might be a good idea now :)

−

* mchua was curious about that one too.

+

* mchua:was curious about that one too.

:'''tomeu''' walterbender: not sure how well it is covered by your proposal, but I planned to keep focusing on bringing more downstream people into sugar development: olpc deployments, igalia, davidfarning's initiative, etc

−

I think we care specially because of LTSP deployments in schools?

+

:I think we care specially because of LTSP deployments in schools?

:'''walterbender''' tomeu: please add some new langauge

:'''tomeu''' walterbender: will do

−

* mchua wrote up her homework here:

+

* mchua:wrote up her homework here:

:'''mchua''' #link http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/User:Mchua/Goals_2010

:'''tomeu''' walterbender: do we need to do anything special regarding RHEL?

−

it is similar to how olpc decides that their next release will be f11 with 0.84

+

:it is similar to how olpc decides that their next release will be f11 with 0.84

:'''mchua''' tomeu: "package things for EPEL," aiui.

:'''walterbender''' cjb: re RHEL... It seems to me that offering a distro-based solution with an expected lifetime measured in multiple years would be desirable for our deployments.

Line 234: Line 233:

:'''walterbender''' cjb: 3-years ago, Sugar wasn't ready... but I can anticipate being there soon... but maybe we are still 1 year too soon.

:'''SeanDaly''' actually, our six-month schedule means we will always be ahead of deployments; yet, it's a good rhythm for improving quickly

−

a very stable Sugar would guarantee our success

+

:a very stable Sugar would guarantee our success

:'''mchua''' tomeu: (again, aiui) what we'd want to do is have Sugar stuff packaged in the EPEL (extra packages for enterprise linux) repositories, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL

:'''tomeu''' walterbender: maybe we shouldn't worry too much about this RHEL and rather worry about the next one

Line 242: Line 241:

:'''tomeu''' cjb: yup

:'''cjb''' ahh

−

when is that scheduled for?

+

:when is that scheduled for?

:'''tomeu''' mchua: right, so no big deal, right?

:'''mchua''' tomeu: right, no big deal at all.

Line 250: Line 249:

:'''tomeu''' walterbender: sounds good to discuss how would sugar 1.0 would look like

:'''CanoeBerry''' INVITE: Will anybody here be joining Gerald Ardito & I our OLPC/Sugar/Haiti Creole Dinner Saturday NYC 5:30? Co-hosted with NYC's Haiti Crisis Camp. Please let me know!

−

http://kombitrestaurant.com

+

:http://kombitrestaurant.com

:'''tomeu''' I can see RHEL being a big deal for us if whatever version we had in the corresponding fedora release wasn't what we wanted in a stable distro

:'''SeanDaly''' might make more sense to imagine a major deployment as being the v1.0

Line 258: Line 257:

:'''SeanDaly''' with QA resources to match

:'''tomeu''' but maybe we don't need to worry so much right now

−

walterbender: makes sense

+

:walterbender: makes sense

−

SeanDaly: yeah, very important

+

:SeanDaly: yeah, very important

:'''cjb''' mchua: ok. but we don't have to do anything special for it other than getting our packages working well in Fedora, I'm guessing

:'''walterbender''' so I will take it off the list of goals for 2010

Line 269: Line 268:

:'''SeanDaly''' How does Sugar run on that distro?

:'''mchua''' cjb: and the step after that is "now that they're packaged (in EPEL) for RHEL, let's QA the living daylights out of it" which is an open question re: resources imo.

−

...but comes along much later. perhaps even next year.

+

:...but comes along much later. perhaps even next year.

:'''walterbender''' new wording: Define Sugar 1.0 so that we can begin partnering with long-term stable distros, such as RHEL

:'''tomeu''' cjb: not impossible for alsroot ;)

Line 278: Line 277:

:'''tomeu''' heh

:'''cjb''' looks like we have 2 mins, folks

−

anything else?

+

:anything else?

−

lfaraone, walterbender: did the WMF servers arrive?

+

:lfaraone, walterbender: did the WMF servers arrive?

:'''walterbender''' mchua: well, we need to talk about where we think we'll be at 1.0 in more concrete terms...

:'''tomeu''' mchua: stating what we want sugar 1.0 look like?

Line 289: Line 288:

:'''lfaraone''' cjb: they were supposed to ship wed, so we're looking at mon/tues

:'''SeanDaly''' I see 2 key goals for SL in 2010:

−

1) fundraising

+

:1) fundraising

−

2) a website with the Sugar interface so anyone can try online

+

:2) a website with the Sugar interface so anyone can try online

:'''walterbender''' could we take it as an action for everyone to review the goals list and make changes?

:'''tomeu''' walterbender: +1

Line 301: Line 300:

:'''mchua''' walterbender: more concrete terms for what, though? design, technical specs, deployability, features, activities, mechanisms-of-participation... ? what's the scope?

:'''walterbender''' OK... time is about up.

−

I am traveling next week and may or may not be able to get on line. Shall we plan to meet again in two weeks?

+

:I am traveling next week and may or may not be able to get on line. Shall we plan to meet again in two weeks?

:'''mchua''' worksforme.

:'''SeanDaly''' walterbender: in CSS and running on the iPad :D

Line 313: Line 312:

:'''walterbender''' cjb: by all means, please contact her

:'''cjb''' just to see whether she has any preference on how enforceable they are

−

thanks

+

:thanks

:'''walterbender''' OK.

:'''CanoeBerry''' ANNC: deployment presentation this Sunday 12 Noon @ OLPC by Vietnam Volunteer Nancie Severs.

:'''SeanDaly''' cjb: you mean if they can possibly work ;-) sure

−

* mchua has a SoaS pilot to start up, will be mildly hosed next week.

+

* mchua:has a SoaS pilot to start up, will be mildly hosed next week.

:'''walterbender''' thanks everyone.

:'''cjb''' SeanDaly: yeah :)

Line 323: Line 322:

:'''walterbender''' #endmeeting

:'''meeting''' Meeting finished at 12:06.

−

Logs available at http://me.etin.gs/sugar-meeting/

+

:Logs available at http://me.etin.gs/sugar-meeting/

:'''walterbender''' CanoeBerry: cannot join you in NYC :(

:'''CanoeBerry''' RSVP Required: Write holt @ laptop . org

−

OK, Sunday's meeting is Boston, can you make it?

+

:OK, Sunday's meeting is Boston, can you make it?

−

12 Noon @ OLPC

+

:12 Noon @ OLPC

:'''SeanDaly''' cjb: keep in mind enforceability not the only criteria - we need to be in contact with our deployments to grow ecosystem & get feedback

:'''walterbender''' mchua: re your third goal, we have the offer of Miami. We need to decide when.

Walter

Bureaucrats, Administrators

10,579

edits

Changes

Oversight Board/2010/Meeting Log-2010-02-05 (view source)

Revision as of 12:13, 5 February 2010

Navigation menu

Search