Difference between revisions of "Marketing Team/Events/FUDCon Brno 2008/Notes"
< Marketing Team | Events | FUDCon Brno 2008
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ChristophD (talk | contribs) (created) |
m (moved Walter is a wanker 12/Events/FUDCon Brno 2008/Notes to Marketing Team/Events/FUDCon Brno 2008/Notes over redirect: revert) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Hope to post readable notes from our discussions at FUDCon here by the evening of Sept. 10. Please poke me if I dont! | + | ==Comments== |
| + | |||
| + | Hope to post readable notes from our discussions at FUDCon here by the | ||
| + | evening of Sept. 10. Please poke me if I dont! | ||
[[User:ChristophD|ChristophD]] 19:05, 9 September 2008 (UTC) | [[User:ChristophD|ChristophD]] 19:05, 9 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Please leave comments here or (better) relay them to the IAEP mailing-list. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:ChristophD|ChristophD]] 00:27, 11 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Notes== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===Telling stories=== | ||
| + | '''telling awesome stories to demonstrate the possibilities enabled by Sugar''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Pentagram's help in designing the interface | ||
| + | * feedback process (once it's actually done) | ||
| + | * Sugar as a ''playground for innovation and experimentation'' (an inspiring comment Tomeu made during Q&A) | ||
| + | * two committees we should consider adding: | ||
| + | ** propaganda (ChristophD has been suggested for that role) | ||
| + | ** outreach | ||
| + | *** university/students liason | ||
| + | *** educators | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===TO-DOs=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * '''find logo''' | ||
| + | * '''finding out who owns the rights to "Sugar" and "Sugar Labs"''' => we have to own the Sugar Labs brand and related entities | ||
| + | * '''have an organizational roadmap, not just a software roadmap''' | ||
| + | * set up feedback process | ||
| + | * make sure to follow-up on projects | ||
| + | * clean up wiki | ||
| + | * next release in 6-months should have the biggest holes fixed | ||
| + | * get an extra or two developers working on Sugar for 4 to 6 months | ||
| + | * testing: outsource it to organizations (ChristophD will talk to people at universities in Graz, Austria on September 21/22 so let's see what happens); requires strong leadership (!); Gnome bug-days as an example; push for automated testing | ||
| + | * emphasis on the importance of responding to bug-reports, even though we don't necessarily have to fix them | ||
| + | * understanding how community works -> make it better at Sugar Labs (find quick wins, proof-points) | ||
| + | * GdK: "simplify and amplify" | ||
| + | * responsibilities | ||
| + | * Sugar Labs Ambassadors (?) | ||
| + | * weekly updates to walter, but also try to spread to more publications (e.g. Sugar ported to Beagle board @ linuxdevices.com) | ||
| + | * focus on work planned for next week | ||
| + | * @IAEP: media liason to spread the story | ||
| + | * engage community via IAEP and Sugar to harness people | ||
| + | * IRC: weekly Sugar Labs meeting, infrequent Board meetings for high-level and sensitive issues such as business, hiring, etc., board meetings open to everyone - patches welcome, candidates have to keep motivated; not only board members can run committees but board holds people accountable | ||
| + | * set up Ministry of Propaganda / Outreach / Truth | ||
| + | * IRL meetings: e.g. FUDCon Boston | ||
Latest revision as of 19:10, 24 February 2010
Comments
Hope to post readable notes from our discussions at FUDCon here by the evening of Sept. 10. Please poke me if I dont!
ChristophD 19:05, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Please leave comments here or (better) relay them to the IAEP mailing-list.
ChristophD 00:27, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Notes
Telling stories
telling awesome stories to demonstrate the possibilities enabled by Sugar
- Pentagram's help in designing the interface
- feedback process (once it's actually done)
- Sugar as a playground for innovation and experimentation (an inspiring comment Tomeu made during Q&A)
- two committees we should consider adding:
- propaganda (ChristophD has been suggested for that role)
- outreach
- university/students liason
- educators
TO-DOs
- find logo
- finding out who owns the rights to "Sugar" and "Sugar Labs" => we have to own the Sugar Labs brand and related entities
- have an organizational roadmap, not just a software roadmap
- set up feedback process
- make sure to follow-up on projects
- clean up wiki
- next release in 6-months should have the biggest holes fixed
- get an extra or two developers working on Sugar for 4 to 6 months
- testing: outsource it to organizations (ChristophD will talk to people at universities in Graz, Austria on September 21/22 so let's see what happens); requires strong leadership (!); Gnome bug-days as an example; push for automated testing
- emphasis on the importance of responding to bug-reports, even though we don't necessarily have to fix them
- understanding how community works -> make it better at Sugar Labs (find quick wins, proof-points)
- GdK: "simplify and amplify"
- responsibilities
- Sugar Labs Ambassadors (?)
- weekly updates to walter, but also try to spread to more publications (e.g. Sugar ported to Beagle board @ linuxdevices.com)
- focus on work planned for next week
- @IAEP: media liason to spread the story
- engage community via IAEP and Sugar to harness people
- IRC: weekly Sugar Labs meeting, infrequent Board meetings for high-level and sensitive issues such as business, hiring, etc., board meetings open to everyone - patches welcome, candidates have to keep motivated; not only board members can run committees but board holds people accountable
- set up Ministry of Propaganda / Outreach / Truth
- IRL meetings: e.g. FUDCon Boston