Difference between revisions of "Oversight Board/2009/Meeting Minutes-2009-12-18"
m (moved Oversight Board/Meeting Minutes-2009-12-18 to Oversight Board/2009/Meeting Minutes-2009-12-18) |
|||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
Voted on in [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-December/009630.html email] | Voted on in [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-December/009630.html email] | ||
| − | Motion | + | Motion passes (5 for; 2 votes not yet tallied) |
=== Further discussion of policy for using Sugar trademark === | === Further discussion of policy for using Sugar trademark === | ||
Lots of good discussion and we are close to some motions. To be continued. | Lots of good discussion and we are close to some motions. To be continued. | ||
| + | |||
| + | (One topic that needs more fleshing out is the definition of "[[Talk:Sugar_Labs/Governance/Trademark#substantially_unmodified|substantially unmodified]]" and its counterpart, "modified".) | ||
=== Guidelines re transactions with the SFC === | === Guidelines re transactions with the SFC === | ||
| Line 54: | Line 56: | ||
== Log == | == Log == | ||
| − | [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Log-2009-12-18|Meeting Log]] | + | [[Oversight_Board/2009/Meeting_Log-2009-12-18|Meeting Log]] |
[[Category:Oversight board]] | [[Category:Oversight board]] | ||
| − | |||
[[Category:Meeting minutes]] | [[Category:Meeting minutes]] | ||
[[Category:Decision panels]] | [[Category:Decision panels]] | ||
Latest revision as of 23:28, 1 March 2011
In attendance:
SLOB members: walter, tomeu, cjb. SeanDaly, mchua, Canoeberry, bernie
Some community members (including satellit, sdziallas, karenesq) attended the meeting.
Agenda
- Revisit Motion 4 from last week
- Resolve outstanding Sugar on a Stick decision (Q3)
- Further discussion of policy for using Sugar trademark
- Guidelines re transactions with the SFC
- Infrastructure proposal
Revisit Motion 4 from last week
Motion 4 from last week in regard to Q2: distro endorsement v. neutrality
As discussed in email after last week's meeting:
MOTION 1: Q2: Sugar Labs encourages all GNU/Linux distributions to package and distribute Sugar, and if possible will assist with hosting and infrastructure. SL Marketing may strategically decide to focus resources towards specific distributions in the interest of promoting Sugar more effectively.
Motion passes (7 for; 0 against)
Resolve outstanding Sugar on a Stick decision (Q3)
MOTION 2: Yes, "Sugar on a Stick" should be reserved by Sugar Labs for use by the SoaS-Fedora distribution so that Sugar can be marketed effectively, until such time when a trademark policy, agreement, and process is put in place: SoaS will be the first project to go through that process.
Voted on in email
Motion passes (5 for; 2 votes not yet tallied)
Further discussion of policy for using Sugar trademark
Lots of good discussion and we are close to some motions. To be continued.
(One topic that needs more fleshing out is the definition of "substantially unmodified" and its counterpart, "modified".)
Guidelines re transactions with the SFC
Walter pointed to Sugar_Labs/Governance/Transactions but we did not discuss the guidelines. To be continued.
Infrastructure proposal
We did not discuss Bernie's infrastructure proposal.
Next meeting
Wednesday, 23 December 2009 15:00 UTC