687
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 75:
Line 75: + + Line 93:
Line 95: − : adding -S forces ... wording is not to hand.+ + + Line 103:
Line 107: + + + + + Line 119:
Line 128: + + − '''What would an experienced user do next?'''+ + + − I think it is worth discussing, and I am not sure about this, in this situation (in my experience) many investigatory commands gave misleading answers, I feel because the whole toolbox was not present. Have I drawn the wrong conclusion?+ + +
User:Inkyfingers/Testing Sweets (view source)
Revision as of 03:22, 22 December 2011
, 03:22, 22 December 2011the sweet "base/x11-libs" had a bug that was found in mint
Another's '''name''' (alternate usage ''<SWEET>'') is dextrose/sugar.
Another's '''name''' (alternate usage ''<SWEET>'') is dextrose/sugar.
<s>look at : [[Talk:Platform_Team/Guide/Sugar_via_Sweets#Notes_on_how_to_start_0.88_or_0.94| How to start 0.88 or 0.94 Sweets Sugar]]--[[User:Satellit|Satellit]] 15:42, 21 December 2011 (EST). Thanks, added in next paragraph.</s>
: These lines aim to draw attention a perceived difficulty in nomenclature. Improved wording welcome.
: These lines aim to draw attention a perceived difficulty in nomenclature. Improved wording welcome.
sweets -S dextrose/sugar:emulator
sweets -S dextrose/sugar:emulator
To explain,
we add an option, -S ( = --force-suggested) to force, using suggested dependencies
Hopefully one of those commands opened Sugar for you.
Hopefully one of those commands opened Sugar for you.
sweets -S sdk/sugar:emulator
sweets -S sdk/sugar:emulator
we can also add an option to the emulator, for example,
sweets sdk/sugar:emulator -f
will ask the emulator to open, full screen.
'''If you have Sugar running - Explore'''
'''If you have Sugar running - Explore'''
the command {{Code|sweets -R sdk/sugar:emulator}} invoked a massive download of packages - @alsroot what changed?
the command {{Code|sweets -R sdk/sugar:emulator}} invoked a massive download of packages - @alsroot what changed?
: Snip from IRC #sugar-newbies, [21:25] <alsroot> the sweet "base/x11-libs" had a bug that was found in mint
'''What would an experienced user do next?'''
I think it is worth discussing, and I am not sure about this, some investigatory commands gave misleading answers, I feel because the whole toolbox was not present.
Have I drawn the wrong conclusion?
A question regarding -R option. Would the -R option eg:
sweets -R sdk/sugar:emulator
be superfluous straight after {{code|sweets upgrade}}?
I am currently in the above described situation with Sweets on Debian Wheezy. What is suggested here, I will test there.
I am currently in the above described situation with Sweets on Debian Wheezy. What is suggested here, I will test there.