Difference between revisions of "Talk:Push-to-talk"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: This proposal would be great, but it is really lacking in planned architecture details. I can't even tell whether you are proposing a single activity or an addition to sugar; how you'd rea...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This proposal would be great, but it is really lacking in planned architecture details. I can't even tell whether you are proposing a single activity or an addition to sugar; how you'd react to a weak connection; how many people could join a conversation; whether both sides could talk at once; let alone what you think it would take to accomplish whatever it is you plan. Please look at the other proposals and expand yours to better match the more-complete ones. [[User:Homunq|Homunq]] 00:33, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | This proposal would be great, but it is really lacking in planned architecture details. I can't even tell whether you are proposing a single activity or an addition to sugar; how you'd react to a weak connection; how many people could join a conversation; whether both sides could talk at once; let alone what you think it would take to accomplish whatever it is you plan. Please look at the other proposals and expand yours to better match the more-complete ones. [[User:Homunq|Homunq]] 00:33, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | The vision of the project is great. Collaboration is the key. I would love to see the project being pursued irrespective of whether it gets selected in GSoC'09. [[User:manusheel|Manu]] | ||
Latest revision as of 12:58, 3 April 2009
This proposal would be great, but it is really lacking in planned architecture details. I can't even tell whether you are proposing a single activity or an addition to sugar; how you'd react to a weak connection; how many people could join a conversation; whether both sides could talk at once; let alone what you think it would take to accomplish whatever it is you plan. Please look at the other proposals and expand yours to better match the more-complete ones. Homunq 00:33, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
The vision of the project is great. Collaboration is the key. I would love to see the project being pursued irrespective of whether it gets selected in GSoC'09. Manu