Marketing Team/Events/MiniCamp Paris 2009/Christoph's Notes: Difference between revisions

ChristophD (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(24 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Here's a list of notes from the various sessions I attended here at [[Sugar Camp Paris 2009]].
{{TOCright}}
Here's a list of notes from the various sessions and discussions I attended here at [[../]].


== School Server ==
== Sessions ==
 
=== School Server ===


* XS-0.6 is looking sweet;-)
* XS-0.6 is looking sweet;-)
* timeframe for 0.6: July (?)
* timeframe for 0.6: July (?)
* bootable SD card to turn an (unlocked) XO into an XS
* bootable SD card to turn an (unlocked) XO into an XS
*  
* improved ejabberd setup


== GCompris ==
=== GCompris ===


* need a maintainer for the Sugar branch (!)
* need a maintainer for the Sugar branch (!)
* GCompris admin interface and student progress => something we need for '''all''' Sugar activities
* GCompris admin interface and student progress => something we need for '''all''' Sugar activities
=== OLPC Quebeque ===
* get template of 'in-school-use document'
=== Sugar 0.86 ===
* '''information subject of change so take it with a grain of salt and await details and confirmation from the actual development team'''
* estimated release: end of September, to coincide with...
** GNOME 2.28 (final release: Sept. 23)
** Fedora 12 release (final freeze: Sept. 22, final release: Nov 3rd)
* considerations about how to include the artefacts produced by the Google Summer of Code projects (=>'''communicate with GSoC students and mentors''')
* focus on bug fixes
** clean up and consolidation of Trac
* switch from Matchbox to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metacity Metacity]
* toolbars: [http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Design_Team/Designs/Toolbars redesign of default view]
* experimentation with new features (mostly in terms of designs and concepts, not necessarily implemented in Sugar-core code)
** Group view
** reward system
** audio subsystem
* general discussion on the question of what features are important (input from deployments and pilot sites is badly needed)
== Random Discussions ==
* '''How can European grassroots initiate and run successful Sugar pilot?'''
* frameworks, frameworks, frameworks
* Uruguay contact (Italian students)
* improve research angle, collect related information and contacts from around the world
== Organization of similar future events ==
=== General thoughts ===
* 2 Sugar focused days as minimum (4 days as a maximum)
* WiFi needs to be available '''all the time'''
* location should have one large room to assemble everyone, smaller seperate spaces to get work done
* food and drinks should be available (Lebanese food prefered;-)
* don't put too much strain on one person (e.g. Sean during Sugar Camp Paris 2009)
* make it possible for remote contributors to attend during the event
=== Pre-Event ===
* announce meeting date and location in due time
* find sponsorship for event
* find suitable location for meetups
* find accomodation for attending people (Urban Camping)
* announce rough agenda in due time
=== During Event ===
* introductory round at the beginning of the day (esp. when new people are present)
* announce how remote contributors can attend during the event
** preferably organize a certain time-slot (e.g. mid-day and/or at the end of the day)
* end with what people liked and didn't like
=== Post-Event ===
* follow up on what was discussed
* make summaries of what was discussed available to the larger community