Difference between revisions of "Karma:Meeting 21 Sep 2009"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by KachachanC (talk) to last revision by BryanWB) |
|||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
# status of Subzero's Thesis | # status of Subzero's Thesis | ||
| − | # The OLE Nepal devs want subzero to create the "Capacity" lesson in Karma. What does subzero think? | + | # The OLE Nepal devs want subzero to create the "Capacity" lesson in Karma. What does subzero think? -- He will have to play with it more to understand the scope of work |
# Pflores visit to Nepal and encouraging Uruguay to use Karma | # Pflores visit to Nepal and encouraging Uruguay to use Karma | ||
# git Stuff | # git Stuff | ||
## Briefly discuss benefits of branching in git vs. creating temporary files like index1.html | ## Briefly discuss benefits of branching in git vs. creating temporary files like index1.html | ||
## power of .gitignore and why we should use it | ## power of .gitignore and why we should use it | ||
| + | ## Bryan needs admin rights to Karma repo | ||
# KCD's return to Austria, how does he want to stay involved? | # KCD's return to Austria, how does he want to stay involved? | ||
# SVG - what are our options? | # SVG - what are our options? | ||
| − | ## raphaeljs? | + | ## different libs |
| − | ## SVGWeb | + | ### raphaeljs? |
| − | ## jquerySVG? | + | ### <strike>SVGWeb</strike> SVG Web is just for cross-browser rendering of SVG |
| + | ### SVGKit (http://svgkit.sourceforge.net/) | ||
| + | ### jquerySVG? | ||
| + | ### dojox.gfx | ||
| + | ## Criteria for Evaluating libraries | ||
| + | ### library download size | ||
| + | ### strength of community behind lib | ||
| + | ### Ease of use | ||
| + | ### Any conflicts using together w/ jquery.karma.js | ||
| + | ## Decisions | ||
| + | ### We will test both dojox.gfx and raphaeljs | ||
| + | ### We will meet 21:15 UTC Wednesday to decide which to use | ||
| + | ### We will keep the chosen svg library separate from Karma and not integrate it | ||
| + | ### Bryan will attempt to reimplement adding_up using the chosen svg library | ||
| + | ### We will refactor Karma according to the SVG library chosen and this will take precedence over the other goals for release 0.2 | ||
| + | |||
| + | The below Meeting Items are shelved awaiting a decision on SVG | ||
| + | ------- | ||
# i18n - progress? | # i18n - progress? | ||
# Review [http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Karma#0.2_.22Gatito.22roadmap for 0.2], are we on track? | # Review [http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Karma#0.2_.22Gatito.22roadmap for 0.2], are we on track? | ||
| Line 18: | Line 36: | ||
## narwhal's method of managing modules and compiling all your project's dependencies into a single file is really sweet | ## narwhal's method of managing modules and compiling all your project's dependencies into a single file is really sweet | ||
# Update on Vaibhaw -- will be working on Karma full-time most likely starting this week | # Update on Vaibhaw -- will be working on Karma full-time most likely starting this week | ||
| + | # Make sure everyone is clear why we should use only js 1.6 and what we can use from it -- filter(), map(), forEach() | ||
| + | # Goals for this week | ||
| + | ## i18n demo working | ||
| + | ### parser script | ||
| + | ### pass unmadindu's sample tests | ||
| + | ## Narwhal | ||
| + | ### Get narwhal working in browser | ||
| + | ### Figure out how to build a package that contains all the dependencies for a project | ||
| + | ## Clean up chakra so all 3 stages look nice | ||
| + | ## Select an SVG library to work w/ or copy | ||
Latest revision as of 20:39, 19 December 2016
- status of Subzero's Thesis
- The OLE Nepal devs want subzero to create the "Capacity" lesson in Karma. What does subzero think? -- He will have to play with it more to understand the scope of work
- Pflores visit to Nepal and encouraging Uruguay to use Karma
- git Stuff
- Briefly discuss benefits of branching in git vs. creating temporary files like index1.html
- power of .gitignore and why we should use it
- Bryan needs admin rights to Karma repo
- KCD's return to Austria, how does he want to stay involved?
- SVG - what are our options?
- different libs
- raphaeljs?
SVGWebSVG Web is just for cross-browser rendering of SVG- SVGKit (http://svgkit.sourceforge.net/)
- jquerySVG?
- dojox.gfx
- Criteria for Evaluating libraries
- library download size
- strength of community behind lib
- Ease of use
- Any conflicts using together w/ jquery.karma.js
- Decisions
- We will test both dojox.gfx and raphaeljs
- We will meet 21:15 UTC Wednesday to decide which to use
- We will keep the chosen svg library separate from Karma and not integrate it
- Bryan will attempt to reimplement adding_up using the chosen svg library
- We will refactor Karma according to the SVG library chosen and this will take precedence over the other goals for release 0.2
- different libs
The below Meeting Items are shelved awaiting a decision on SVG
- i18n - progress?
- Review for 0.2, are we on track?
- mpavel looking for more things to work on, what should we ask him to do?
- Narwhal and packaging
- Talk about how narwhal handles packaging
- Should we make karma a narwhal package?
- narwhal's method of managing modules and compiling all your project's dependencies into a single file is really sweet
- Update on Vaibhaw -- will be working on Karma full-time most likely starting this week
- Make sure everyone is clear why we should use only js 1.6 and what we can use from it -- filter(), map(), forEach()
- Goals for this week
- i18n demo working
- parser script
- pass unmadindu's sample tests
- Narwhal
- Get narwhal working in browser
- Figure out how to build a package that contains all the dependencies for a project
- Clean up chakra so all 3 stages look nice
- Select an SVG library to work w/ or copy
- i18n demo working