Talk:Trademark: Difference between revisions

(71 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)

Line 6:

::--[[User:FGrose|FGrose]] 23:18, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

==Logo==

: In paragraph 1, "(our trademark registration application for the logo is still pending)", is a separate statement, right? Sugar Labs is already registered, but the logos (colors and ~~typface~~) are pending registration, no? If so, this would be more clear as a separate sentence in the introduction, as it is currently too closely associated with the Sugar Labs name.

: In paragraph 1, "(our trademark registration application for the logo is still pending)", is a separate statement, right? Sugar Labs is already registered, but the logos (colors and typeface) are pending registration, no? If so, this would be more clear as a separate sentence in the introduction, as it is currently too closely associated with the Sugar Labs name.

::--[[User:FGrose|FGrose]] 23:45, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

::AFAIK, the logo is not registered. It seemed that the name "Sugar Labs" was enough. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 00:00, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Line 34:

** However, when distributing or selling this modified version, you '''must not''' call it Sugar on a Stick.

** When not exposing the resulting product to the public, you '''may''' still call it Sugar on a Stick, though. A deployment might adjust Sugar on a Stick for its needs and still say it deployed Sugar on a Stick, as long as the modified version is not distributed publicly.

== substantially unmodified ==

We discuss examples of "substantially unmodified" in [[Sugar Labs/Governance/Trademark|Section 2]] of the policy: "including but not limited to: the enabling or disabling of certain features by default, changes required for compatibility with a particular operating system distribution, or the inclusion of bug-fix patches." But it would be instructive to give some examples of changes that would not qualify as substantially unmodified: including but not limited to adding of non-free drivers. (We need to build consensus around this issue.) --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 20:44, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

== How to make modifications ==

There is a discussion [[Features/SoaS_customization|here]] about making a systemic process for most trivial modifications. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 20:44, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

==Sugar Trademark Policy==

Final text moved to [[Trademark]] during the May 6/7, 2010 SLOBs approval.

= Trademark case studies =

As the next step in working on the trademark, we are preparing case studies. The below text is taken from the [[Trademark case studies]] page - please [http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Trademark_case_studies&action=edit edit that page directly] to contribute.

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 ::--[[User:FGrose|FGrose]] 23:18, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 ==Logo==
-: In paragraph 1, "(our trademark registration application for the logo is still pending)", is a separate statement, right? Sugar Labs is already registered, but the logos (colors and typface) are pending registration, no?  If so, this would be more clear as a separate sentence in the introduction, as it is currently too closely associated with the Sugar Labs name.
+: In paragraph 1, "(our trademark registration application for the logo is still pending)", is a separate statement, right? Sugar Labs is already registered, but the logos (colors and typeface) are pending registration, no?  If so, this would be more clear as a separate sentence in the introduction, as it is currently too closely associated with the Sugar Labs name.
 ::--[[User:FGrose|FGrose]] 23:45, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 ::AFAIK, the logo is not registered. It seemed that the name "Sugar Labs" was enough. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 00:00, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
@@ Line 34: / Line 34: @@
 ** However, when distributing or selling this modified version, you '''must not''' call it Sugar on a Stick.
 ** When not exposing the resulting product to the public, you '''may''' still call it Sugar on a Stick, though. A deployment might adjust Sugar on a Stick for its needs and still say it deployed Sugar on a Stick, as long as the modified version is not distributed publicly.
+== substantially unmodified ==
+We discuss examples of "substantially unmodified" in [[Sugar Labs/Governance/Trademark|Section 2]] of the policy: "including but not limited to: the enabling or disabling of certain features by default, changes required for compatibility with a particular operating system distribution, or the inclusion of bug-fix patches." But it would be instructive to give some examples of changes that would not qualify as substantially unmodified: including but not limited to adding of non-free drivers. (We need to build consensus around this issue.) --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 20:44, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
+== How to make modifications ==
+There is a discussion [[Features/SoaS_customization|here]] about making a systemic process for most trivial modifications. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 20:44, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
+==Sugar Trademark Policy==
+Final text moved to [[Trademark]] during the May 6/7, 2010 SLOBs approval.
+= Trademark case studies =
+As the next step in working on the trademark, we are preparing case studies. The below text is taken from the [[Trademark case studies]] page - please [http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Trademark_case_studies&action=edit edit that page directly] to contribute.
+{{:Trademark case studies}}