Activity Library/Devel/Roadmap: Difference between revisions
Proposal, as mailed to teh lists |
No edit summary |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Proposal / Suggestion == | <noinclude> | ||
[[Category:Activity Team]] | |||
</noinclude> | |||
== Implemented as activities.sugarlabs.org (Sugar Activities Library)== | |||
There is now http://activities.sugarlabs.org, based on the "Remora" code powering http://addons.mozilla.org. | |||
== May 2008 Proposal / Suggestion == | |||
I've been thinking about a better portal for downloading activities. I | I've been thinking about a better portal for downloading activities. I | ||
| Line 10: | Line 17: | ||
Activities should be categorised according to various properties, including: | Activities should be categorised according to various properties, including: | ||
* The usual activity metadata from activity.info | * The usual activity metadata from activity.info | ||
* Descriptions, as in | * Descriptions, as in [[olpc:Activities]] | ||
* Category, as in | * Category, as in [[olpc:Activities]] | ||
* Age ranges the activity is suitable for? (Possibly a Mature category for Doom?) | * Age ranges the activity is suitable for? (Possibly a Mature category for Doom?) | ||
:how will this be filtered to prevent misuse? [[User:Yamaplos|Yamaplos]] 18:23, 19 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
::I think site administrators would keep an eye that activities are classified appropriately. I had in mind some categories like age 6-8, 8-10 etc but perhaps that should not be determined so finely. However stuff like spreadsheets could be described with an older child type of category.--[[User:Morgs|Morgs]] 18:55, 19 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
* Competencies required: Pre-reading, reading, writing, ... | * Competencies required: Pre-reading, reading, writing, ... | ||
* Development maturity | * Development maturity | ||