User:Inkyfingers/Testing Sweets: Difference between revisions

(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)

Line 75:

Another's '''name''' (alternate usage ''<SWEET>'') is dextrose/sugar.

*look at : [[Talk:Platform_Team/Guide/Sugar_via_Sweets#Notes_on_how_to_start_0.88_or_0.94| How to start 0.88 or 0.94 Sweets Sugar]]--[[User:Satellit|Satellit]] 15:42, 21 December 2011 (EST)

<s>look at : [[Talk:Platform_Team/Guide/Sugar_via_Sweets#Notes_on_how_to_start_0.88_or_0.94| How to start 0.88 or 0.94 Sweets Sugar]]--[[User:Satellit|Satellit]] 15:42, 21 December 2011 (EST). Thanks, added in next paragraph.</s>

: These lines aim to draw attention a perceived difficulty in nomenclature. Improved wording welcome.

Line 94:

Line 95:

sweets -S dextrose/sugar:emulator

~~: adding~~ -S ( = --force-suggested) force using suggested dependencies

To explain,

we add an option, -S ( = --force-suggested) to force, using suggested dependencies

Hopefully one of those commands opened Sugar for you.

Line 104:

Line 107:

sweets -S sdk/sugar:emulator

we can also add an option to the emulator, for example,

sweets sdk/sugar:emulator -f

will ask the emulator to open, full screen.

'''If you have Sugar running - Explore'''

Line 120:

Line 128:

the command {{Code|sweets -R sdk/sugar:emulator}} invoked a massive download of packages - @alsroot what changed?

: Snip from IRC #sugar-newbies, [21:25] <alsroot> the sweet "base/x11-libs" had a bug that was found in mint

'''What would an experienced user do next?'''

I think it is worth discussing, and I am not sure about this, some investigatory commands gave misleading answers, I feel because the whole toolbox was not present.

~~Eg {{code|sweets -S --logfile=five sdk/sugar}} produces ~/five, but the contents = 0 bytes.~~

Have I drawn the wrong conclusion?

@@ Line 75: / Line 75: @@
 Another's '''name''' (alternate usage ''<SWEET>'') is dextrose/sugar.
-*look at :  [[Talk:Platform_Team/Guide/Sugar_via_Sweets#Notes_on_how_to_start_0.88_or_0.94| How to start 0.88 or 0.94 Sweets Sugar]]--[[User:Satellit|Satellit]] 15:42, 21 December 2011 (EST)
+<s>look at :  [[Talk:Platform_Team/Guide/Sugar_via_Sweets#Notes_on_how_to_start_0.88_or_0.94| How to start 0.88 or 0.94 Sweets Sugar]]--[[User:Satellit|Satellit]] 15:42, 21 December 2011 (EST). Thanks, added in next paragraph.</s>
 : These lines aim to draw attention a perceived difficulty in nomenclature. Improved wording welcome.
@@ Line 94: / Line 95: @@
   sweets -S dextrose/sugar:emulator
-: adding -S ( = --force-suggested) force using suggested dependencies
+To explain,
+we add an option, -S ( = --force-suggested) to force, using suggested dependencies
 Hopefully one of those commands opened Sugar for you.
@@ Line 104: / Line 107: @@
   sweets -S sdk/sugar:emulator
+we can also add an option to the emulator, for example,
+ sweets sdk/sugar:emulator -f
+will ask the emulator to open, full screen.
 '''If you have Sugar running - Explore'''
@@ Line 120: / Line 128: @@
 the command {{Code|sweets -R sdk/sugar:emulator}} invoked a massive download of packages -  @alsroot what changed?
+: Snip from IRC #sugar-newbies, [21:25] <alsroot> the sweet "base/x11-libs" had a bug that was found in mint
 '''What would an experienced user do next?'''
 I think it is worth discussing, and I am not sure about this, some investigatory commands gave misleading answers, I feel because the whole toolbox was not present.
-Eg {{code|sweets -S --logfile=five sdk/sugar}} produces ~/five, but the contents = 0 bytes.
 Have I drawn the wrong conclusion?