Oversight Board/Meeting Minutes-2012-05-30: Difference between revisions

(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)

Line 10:

=== Local Labs ===

We discussed a motion by Walter to modify the [[Trademark]] and [[Local Labs]] pages in the wiki as per the recommendation of the SFC. See below. The motion was seconded and ~~we began~~ a vote~~. We await further votes by email~~.

We discussed a motion by Walter to modify the [[Trademark]] and [[Local Labs]] pages in the wiki as per the recommendation of the SFC. See below. The motion was seconded and passed by a vote of 5 for and 2 against.

Specifically:

Line 23:

The popularity of the Sugar platform has inspired numerous unaffiliated volunteers, developers, and deployment specialists to use Sugar and educate others on how to use Sugar. We affectionately refer to these user communities as "Local Labs," and allow them to refer to themselves as Sugar Labs <Region Name> without written permission. For a partial listing of Sugar Labs Local Labs, see http://......."

==== 2. Updates to the Local Lab wiki ([[Local_Labs]]) ====

Line 63:

Line 62:

"To consult with Tony if the text 'Sugar Labs Local Labs are not officially endorsed by or affiliated with the Software Freedom Conservancy.' would work equally as well and if so, to use it" ?

Walter has consulted with Tony, [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2012-May/015313.html who responded ~~in the negative~~].

Walter has consulted with Tony, [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2012-May/015313.html who responded "I can't approve this edit."].

== Log ==

http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2012-05-30T21:08:10

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 === Local Labs ===
-We discussed a motion by Walter to modify the [[Trademark]] and [[Local Labs]] pages in the wiki as per the recommendation of the SFC. See below. The motion was seconded and we began a vote. We await further votes by email.
+We discussed a motion by Walter to modify the [[Trademark]] and [[Local Labs]] pages in the wiki as per the recommendation of the SFC. See below. The motion was seconded and passed by a vote of 5 for and 2 against.
 Specifically:
@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 The popularity of the Sugar platform has inspired numerous unaffiliated volunteers, developers, and deployment specialists to use Sugar and educate others on how to use Sugar. We affectionately refer to these user communities as "Local Labs," and allow them to refer to themselves as Sugar Labs <Region Name> without written permission. For a partial listing of Sugar Labs Local Labs, see http://......."
 ==== 2. Updates to the Local Lab wiki ([[Local_Labs]]) ====
@@ Line 63: / Line 62: @@
 "To consult with Tony if the text 'Sugar Labs Local Labs are not officially endorsed by or affiliated with the Software Freedom Conservancy.' would work equally as well and if so, to use it" ?
-Walter has consulted with Tony, [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2012-May/015313.html who responded in the negative].
+Walter has consulted with Tony, [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2012-May/015313.html who responded "I can't approve this edit."].
 == Log ==
 http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2012-05-30T21:08:10