Talk:Features/Terminal Sharing: Difference between revisions

Eben (talk | contribs)
Created page with 'This sounds quite fun and useful. Is there a reason this couldn't be integrated with the Terminal activity itself, with these features enabled when the activity is shared? -~~~~'
 
Erikos (talk | contribs)
Feature Acceptance: new section
Line 1: Line 1:
This sounds quite fun and useful. Is there a reason this couldn't be integrated with the Terminal activity itself, with these features enabled when the activity is shared? -[[User:Eben|Eben]] 02:04, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
This sounds quite fun and useful. Is there a reason this couldn't be integrated with the Terminal activity itself, with these features enabled when the activity is shared? -[[User:Eben|Eben]] 02:04, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
== Feature Acceptance ==
Hi Benjamin,
what would be the downside of packing the needed packages inside the activity? I guess one criteria for adding to the platform is: is this worthy for several activities?
Return to "Features/Terminal Sharing" page.