Decision panels/SOAS: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 [[category:decision panels]]
-===Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases? ===
+<b>Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?</b>
-===Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another? ===
-===Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution? ===
-===Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question: "Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution? ===
+<b>Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another? </b>
+<b>Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution? </b>
+<b>Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question: "Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution? </b>
+<b>Potential naming conventions: </b>
+* Sugar4CD/PC/F11 (Sugar, version 4, made for liveCD, runs on PCs, Fedora11 based) - example from Caryl Bigenho <cbigenho@hotmail.com>