Decision panels/SOAS: Difference between revisions

Line 66:

Question 1: "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?"

Answer: ~~''unresolved''~~

Answer: No, not now. SL is not now a full-service GNU/Linux distributor but 1) many contributors volunteer to help with individual tasks thereof; and 2) an official plan is part of a number of SugarLabs' members plans.

~~~~

Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"

Answer: ~~''unresolved''~~

Answer: No. Sugar On a Stick, the Fedora-derived distribution, will be the endorsed distribution.

~~<!--~~ No. Sugar On a Stick, the Fedora-derived distribution, will be the endorsed distribution.

~~-->~~

Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"

Answer: ~~''unresolved''~~

Answer: Yes.

~~~~

Line 115:

Line 112:

===Report on Questions 1-3===

~~These questions have not been resolved yet; a minority of panel members have weighted in so far. 05:29, 8 October 2009 (UTC)~~

====Question 1====

Line 122:

Line 119:

Question 1: "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?"

Answer:

Answer: No, not now. SL is not now a full-service GNU/Linux distributor but 1) many contributors volunteer to help with individual tasks thereof; and 2) an official plan is part of a number of SugarLabs' members plans.

====Question 2====

Line 129:

Line 127:

Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"

Answer:

Answer: No. Sugar On a Stick, the Fedora-derived distribution, will be the endorsed distribution.

====Question 3====

Line 136:

Line 135:

Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"

Answer:

Answer: Yes.

@@ Line 66: / Line 66: @@
 Question 1: "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?"
-Answer: ''unresolved''
+Answer: No, not now. SL is not now a full-service GNU/Linux distributor but 1) many contributors volunteer to help with individual tasks thereof; and 2) an official plan is part of a number of SugarLabs' members plans.
-<!-- No, not now. SL is not now a full-service GNU/Linux distributor but 1) many contributors volunteer to help with individual tasks thereof; and 2) an official plan is part of a number of SugarLabs' members plans. -->
 Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"
-Answer: ''unresolved''
+Answer: No.  Sugar On a Stick, the Fedora-derived distribution, will be the endorsed distribution.
-<!-- No.  Sugar On a Stick, the Fedora-derived distribution, will be the endorsed distribution.
--->
 Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"
-Answer: ''unresolved''
+Answer: Yes.
-<!-- Yes. -->
@@ Line 115: / Line 112: @@
 ===Report on Questions 1-3===
-These questions have not been resolved yet; a minority of panel members have weighted in so far.  05:29, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 ====Question 1====
@@ Line 122: / Line 119: @@
 Question 1: "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?"
-Answer:
+Answer: No, not now. SL is not now a full-service GNU/Linux distributor but 1) many contributors volunteer to help with individual tasks thereof; and 2) an official plan is part of a number of SugarLabs' members plans.
 ====Question 2====
@@ Line 129: / Line 127: @@
 Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"
-Answer:
+Answer: No.  Sugar On a Stick, the Fedora-derived distribution, will be the endorsed distribution.
 ====Question 3====
@@ Line 136: / Line 135: @@
 Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"
-Answer:
+Answer: Yes.