Decision panels/SOAS/Report: Difference between revisions

Line 21:

;Question 1: "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?"

;Answer: ~~There is no consensus on this yet. A plurality of people with definite opinions say~~ ''yes''. There has been some discussion about what is involved in 'being a GNU/Linux distributor' and what the risks and benefits would be; specifics have been suggested but not clearly enumerated, making consensus building harder. [[#Question_1|TBD - see below for opinions]]

;Answer: Consensus trending towards ''yes''. There has been some discussion about what is involved in 'being a GNU/Linux distributor' and what the risks and benefits would be; specifics have been suggested but not clearly enumerated, making consensus building harder. [[#Question_1|TBD - see below for opinions]]

;Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"

Line 27:

;Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"

;Answer: ~~Consensus is trending towards '~~''yes''', SL should ask its community to avoid using 'Sugar on a Stick' in a confusing way. [[#Question_3|TBD - see below for opinions]]

;Answer: A plurality of people with definite opinions say ''yes'', SL should ask its community to avoid using 'Sugar on a Stick' in a confusing way. There is consensus that whatever name is used for common distributions should not be used in a confusing way, but disagreement over whether SOAS should refer to a specific distribution or a broad class of them. [[#Question_3|TBD - see below for opinions]]

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 ;Question 1: "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?"
-;Answer: There is no consensus on this yet.  A plurality of people with definite opinions say ''yes''.  There has been some discussion about what is involved in 'being a GNU/Linux distributor' and what the risks and benefits would be; specifics have been suggested but not clearly enumerated, making consensus building harder. [[#Question_1|TBD - see below for opinions]]
+;Answer: Consensus trending towards ''yes''.   There has been some discussion about what is involved in 'being a GNU/Linux distributor' and what the risks and benefits would be; specifics have been suggested but not clearly enumerated, making consensus building harder. [[#Question_1|TBD - see below for opinions]]
 ;Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"
@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 ;Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"
-;Answer:  Consensus is trending towards '''yes''', SL should ask its community to avoid using 'Sugar on a Stick' in a confusing way.   [[#Question_3|TBD - see below for opinions]]
+;Answer:  A plurality of people with definite opinions say ''yes'', SL should ask its community to avoid using 'Sugar on a Stick' in a confusing way.  There is consensus that whatever name is used for common distributions should not be used in a confusing way, but disagreement over whether SOAS should refer to a specific distribution or a broad class of them.   [[#Question_3|TBD - see below for opinions]]