Decision panels/SOAS/Report: Difference between revisions

Line 153:

Sugar releases?"

|-

!width="20%"| Yes

!width="30%"| Yes

!width="20%"| No

!width="30%"| No

~~!width="20%"| Defer~~

!width="20%"| Invalid

!width="10%"| Defer

! Undecided

|-

Line 170:

# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000154.html Tabitha Roder]

# Caryl Bigenho

|

|

# Samuel Klein

~~| ~~

|

# Faisal Khan

Line 183:

|+ Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"

|-

!width="20%"| Yes

!width="30%"| Yes

!width="20%"| No

!width="30%"| No

~~!width="20%"| Defer~~

!width="20%"| Invalid

!width="10%"| Defer

! Undecided

|-

Line 195:

# Luke Faraone

# Sebastian Dziallas

# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000289.html Benjamin M. Schwartz] - SL should make ~~personalized~~, not blanket, endorsements

# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000289.html Benjamin M. Schwartz] - SL should make specific, not blanket endorsements

# Sean Daly - SL should make only context-specific endorsements

|

# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]

|

# Samuel Klein - SL should support effective distros more than ineffective ones.

|

~~| ~~

~~# Samuel Klein - SL should endorse effective distros while encouraging incomplete ones to improve.~~

|

# Bill Bogstad

# Faisal Khan

# Daniel Drake

~~# Sean Daly~~

|}

Line 215:

!width="20%"| Yes

!width="20%"| No

~~!width="20%"| Defer~~

!width="20%"| Invalid

!width="10%"| Defer

! Undecided

|-

|

# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000045.html Sean Daly] ~~More specifically,~~ SL should reserve the right to determine which distro to associate with ~~"Sugar on a Stick"~~, today Fedora, but possibly another ~~in future~~. ~~To avoid disorganization, I propose that this choice be formalized, perhaps with annually scheduled SLOBs decisions, or sooner under certain conditions~~

# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000045.html Sean Daly] <small>SL should reserve the right to determine which distro to associate with SOAS, today Fedora, but possibly another later.</small>

# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]

# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000154.html Tabitha Roder]

Line 229:

# Caryl Bigenho

# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000289.html Benjamin M. Schwartz] - use a more specific name

|

# Samuel Klein - Too specific. Avoid being confusing; SOAS could still refer to a branded line of 'sticks'.

|

~~| ~~

~~# Samuel Klein - Too specific. There is consensus that the SL community should avoid being confusing. SOAS could still refer to a line of 'sticks'.~~

|

# Bill Bogstad

@@ Line 153: / Line 153: @@
 Sugar releases?"
 |-
-!width="20%"| Yes
+!width="30%"| Yes
-!width="20%"| No
+!width="30%"| No
-!width="20%"| Defer
 !width="20%"| Invalid
+!width="10%"| Defer
 ! Undecided
 |-
@@ Line 170: / Line 170: @@
 # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000154.html Tabitha Roder]
 # Caryl Bigenho
+| <!-- invalid question -->
 | <!-- defer -->
 # Samuel Klein
-| <!-- invalid question -->
 | <!-- undecided -->
 # Faisal Khan
@@ Line 183: / Line 183: @@
 |+ Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"
 |-
-!width="20%"| Yes
+!width="30%"| Yes
-!width="20%"| No
+!width="30%"| No
-!width="20%"| Defer
 !width="20%"| Invalid
+!width="10%"| Defer
 ! Undecided
 |-
@@ Line 195: / Line 195: @@
 # Luke Faraone
 # Sebastian Dziallas
-# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000289.html Benjamin M. Schwartz] - SL should make personalized, not blanket, endorsements
+# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000289.html Benjamin M. Schwartz] - SL should make specific, not blanket endorsements
+# Sean Daly - SL should make only context-specific endorsements
 | <!-- no -->
 # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]
+| <!-- invalid question -->
+# Samuel Klein - SL should support effective distros more than ineffective ones.
 | <!-- defer -->
-| <!-- invalid question -->
-# Samuel Klein - SL should endorse effective distros while encouraging incomplete ones to improve.
 | <!-- undecided -->
 # Bill Bogstad
 # Faisal Khan
 # Daniel Drake
-# Sean Daly
 |}
@@ Line 215: / Line 215: @@
 !width="20%"| Yes
 !width="20%"| No
-!width="20%"| Defer
 !width="20%"| Invalid
+!width="10%"| Defer
 ! Undecided
 |-
 | <!-- yes -->
-# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000045.html Sean Daly] More specifically, SL should reserve the right to determine which distro to associate with "Sugar on a Stick", today Fedora, but possibly another in future. To avoid disorganization, I propose that this choice be formalized, perhaps with annually scheduled SLOBs decisions, or sooner under certain conditions
+# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000045.html Sean Daly] <small>SL should reserve the right to determine which distro to associate with SOAS, today Fedora, but possibly another later.</small>
 # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000149.html Abhishek Indoria]
 # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000154.html Tabitha Roder]
@@ Line 229: / Line 229: @@
 # Caryl Bigenho
 # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000289.html Benjamin M. Schwartz] - use a more specific name
+| <!-- invalid question -->
+# Samuel Klein - Too specific.  Avoid being confusing; SOAS could still refer to a branded line of 'sticks'.
 | <!-- defer -->
-| <!-- invalid question -->
-# Samuel Klein - Too specific.  There is consensus that the SL community should avoid being confusing.  SOAS could still refer to a line of 'sticks'.
 | <!-- undecided -->
 # Bill Bogstad