Oversight Board/Meeting Minutes-2012-05-30: Difference between revisions

Line 10:

=== Local Labs ===

We discussed a motion by ~~walter~~ to modify the [[Trademark]] and [[Local Labs]] pages in the wiki as per the recommendation of the SFC. See below. The motion was seconded and we began a vote. We await further votes by email.

We discussed a motion by Walter to modify the [[Trademark]] and [[Local Labs]] pages in the wiki as per the recommendation of the SFC. See below. The motion was seconded and we began a vote. We await further votes by email.

Specifically:

Line 57:

"Sugar Labs Local Labs are not officially endorsed by or affiliated with Sugar Labs or the Software Freedom Conservancy."

~~----~~

==== Proposed modification ====

A second motion was made by ~~icarito~~, but not seconded:

A second motion was made by Icarito, but not seconded:

"To consult with ~~tony~~ if the text 'Sugar Labs Local Labs are not officially endorsed by or affiliated with the Software Freedom Conservancy.' would work equally as well and if so, to use it" ?

"To consult with Tony if the text 'Sugar Labs Local Labs are not officially endorsed by or affiliated with the Software Freedom Conservancy.' would work equally as well and if so, to use it" ?

Walter has consulted with Tony, [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2012-May/015313.html who responded in the negative].

== Log ==

http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2012-05-30T21:08:10

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 === Local Labs ===
-We discussed a motion by walter to modify the [[Trademark]] and [[Local Labs]] pages in the wiki as per the recommendation of the SFC. See below. The motion was seconded and we began a vote. We await further votes by email.
+We discussed a motion by Walter to modify the [[Trademark]] and [[Local Labs]] pages in the wiki as per the recommendation of the SFC. See below. The motion was seconded and we began a vote. We await further votes by email.
 Specifically:
@@ Line 57: / Line 57: @@
 "Sugar Labs Local Labs are not officially endorsed by or affiliated with Sugar Labs or the Software Freedom Conservancy."
-----
+==== Proposed modification ====
-A second motion was made by icarito, but not seconded:
+A second motion was made by Icarito, but not seconded:
-"To consult with tony if the text 'Sugar Labs Local Labs are not officially endorsed by or affiliated with the Software Freedom Conservancy.' would work equally as well and if so, to use it" ?
+"To consult with Tony if the text 'Sugar Labs Local Labs are not officially endorsed by or affiliated with the Software Freedom Conservancy.' would work equally as well and if so, to use it" ?
+Walter has consulted with Tony, [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2012-May/015313.html who responded in the negative].
 == Log ==
 http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2012-05-30T21:08:10