Difference between revisions of "Oversight Board/2010/Meeting Minutes-2010-01-22"

From Sugar Labs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
== Trademark ==
 
== Trademark ==
 +
 +
=== Background ===
  
 
We are working on completing and ratifying a trademark policy for the Sugar Labs marks, which are held by the SFC on behalf of SL. This policy will have to be approved by the SFLC before it becomes legally binding; once it does, it will affect the following marks when used in a Sugar Labs context:
 
We are working on completing and ratifying a trademark policy for the Sugar Labs marks, which are held by the SFC on behalf of SL. This policy will have to be approved by the SFLC before it becomes legally binding; once it does, it will affect the following marks when used in a Sugar Labs context:
Line 15: Line 17:
  
 
We currently have '''no ratified trademark policy.''' We have been using [[Sugar_Labs/Governance/Trademark]] as our guide on individual cases in the interim. The current draft of our trademark policy is available at [[Talk:Sugar_Labs/Governance/Trademark#Sugar_Trademark_Policy]].
 
We currently have '''no ratified trademark policy.''' We have been using [[Sugar_Labs/Governance/Trademark]] as our guide on individual cases in the interim. The current draft of our trademark policy is available at [[Talk:Sugar_Labs/Governance/Trademark#Sugar_Trademark_Policy]].
 +
 +
=== Discussion points ===
 +
 +
=== Motion ===
 +
 +
To be called when the discussion is over, and there is general consensus that the trademark policy draft is ready:
 +
 +
MOTION: Approve the trademark policy listed at LINK.
 +
 +
=== Followup ===
 +
 +
The following action items need to be taken by somebody.
 +
 +
* #action Clean up the wiki pages to reflect this discussion, making any redirects needed to clarify that all prior draft work has been pulled into the current, SLOBs-ratified trademark policy. Note on the policy page that the policy is pending approval by the SFLC.
 +
* #action Notify the community of the trademark ratification via the usual means (iaep with a [SLOBs] tag, Planet).
 +
* #action Forward the trademark policy to the SFLC for approval; check in on progress next week.
  
 
== Future issues to address ==
 
== Future issues to address ==
  
 
None immediately, as of now - [[Oversight_Board/Minutes]] may provide some inspiration. Please add topics to the list if they come up.
 
None immediately, as of now - [[Oversight_Board/Minutes]] may provide some inspiration. Please add topics to the list if they come up.

Revision as of 08:23, 20 January 2010

Finances

Infrastructure

Trademark

Background

We are working on completing and ratifying a trademark policy for the Sugar Labs marks, which are held by the SFC on behalf of SL. This policy will have to be approved by the SFLC before it becomes legally binding; once it does, it will affect the following marks when used in a Sugar Labs context:

  • Sugar Labs (trademark registered)
  • Sugar on a Stick (trademark in the process of being registered)
  • Sugar Labs Partner
  • Sugar Ready
  • Sugar Learning Platform
  • Sugar

We currently have no ratified trademark policy. We have been using Sugar_Labs/Governance/Trademark as our guide on individual cases in the interim. The current draft of our trademark policy is available at Talk:Sugar_Labs/Governance/Trademark#Sugar_Trademark_Policy.

Discussion points

Motion

To be called when the discussion is over, and there is general consensus that the trademark policy draft is ready:

MOTION: Approve the trademark policy listed at LINK.

Followup

The following action items need to be taken by somebody.

  • #action Clean up the wiki pages to reflect this discussion, making any redirects needed to clarify that all prior draft work has been pulled into the current, SLOBs-ratified trademark policy. Note on the policy page that the policy is pending approval by the SFLC.
  • #action Notify the community of the trademark ratification via the usual means (iaep with a [SLOBs] tag, Planet).
  • #action Forward the trademark policy to the SFLC for approval; check in on progress next week.

Future issues to address

None immediately, as of now - Oversight_Board/Minutes may provide some inspiration. Please add topics to the list if they come up.