Oversight Board/Minutes

Hi All.

Nice forum.happy to be here and hope to be more involved.

thanks, Mickael

<a href=http://forums.vogue.com.au/member.php?u=82990>äëøåéåú</a> <a href=http://www.fxp.co.il/member.php?u=254061>ñèåöéí, äëøåéåú çéìåôé æåâåú</a>

When and where

• to be determined (probably on the order of 1–2 times per month
• Friday
• 17.00 (UTC)
• irc.freenode.net, #sugar-meeting

To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run:

date -d '[current date] [time] UTC' 
date -d '2008-06-03 17:00 UTC'

Who

The meeting is mainly targeted to Sugar Oversight Board, but everyone interested is welcome to join. It's primary purpose is to discuss general issues related to Sugar and the Sugar community; however, it is not intended as a replacement for the weekly developer meetings.

How to add topics

You can add the topics that you want to discuss during the week to the topics section for the meeting. They will be collected during the week and send out in the meeting announcement on _____. A reminder to add topics will be sent out _____.

Meetings

Friday July 18 2008 - 17.00 (UTC)

Logs

Sugar Labs/OversightBoard/Log-2008-07-18

Attending

marcopg, walter, erikos, cjb, cjl, dfarning, tomeu, bemasc, erikg

Topics

Topic

Sugar Labs status

• SF Conservancy SFC-SugarLabs Agreement

We await feedback from the SFC and OLPC, but there was consensus that it is an adequate expression of the needs of Sugar Labs.

• Membership

There was consensus that we have made sufficient outreach to the community that the initial list is a fair representation of Sugar Labs; we look forward to having the Membership Committee take it from here.

• • http://selectricity.org/

There was consensus that Walter would put together a strawman election process based upon the Selectricity tool. We are targeting an August election.

• Committees

There was consensus that we begin with just Oversight and Members committees.

• Image
  • Image:Luca-logo-5wb4.png

We agreed for the need to solict more feedback in rhe wiki for the design direction being proposed by Luca.

• Budget/Funding
  • Trademarks

We agreed that further discussions with the SFLA about the merits of trademark protection is needed.

• • Conferences
    • Linux [1]

We agreed on the desirability of Sugar Labs participation at conferences around the world, but hope to meet the need by utilizing locals to whatever extent possible. We also discussed the desireability to have a meeting of Sugar Labs developers a couple of times per year. We discussed the possibility of an on-line meeting that leverages resources above and beyond IRC.

• • • Education [2]

We agreed on the necessity of Sugar Labs participation in the learning community, but don't yet have a good handle on the best and most efficient means of accomplishing this.

• • Infrastructure

We briefly reviewed the current situation and will solicit a report from the ad hoc infrastructure committee for next week's continuation of the discussion.

• • Staff

We adjourned after agreeing to reconvene on the 25 July.

Friday 1 August 2008 - 17.00 (UTC)

Topics

Topic

Administrative

• Review minutes from last meeting
• Set next meeting date

Topic

Infrastructure status

• Hardware
• Hosting
• etc.

Topic

Key issues

• Engineering
  • Stability
  • QA
  • Updates
  • growing the community of contributors
• Learning
  • Outreach
  • Feedback
  • growing the community of contributors