Talk:Sugar Labs/Getting Involved
< Talk:Sugar Labs
Revision as of 19:17, 23 February 2010 by Page move vandal (talk | contribs) (moved Talk:Sugar Labs/Getting Involved to Talk:Walter is a wanker 4: Walter is a wanker)
Questions
Is the content writer section referring to the wiki? cwhii
- Yes, I saw this section yesterday and I'm fairly certain that was the intent. You'll notice that the associated teams are the Doc, Wiki, and Marketing teams. Ridderman 16:55, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Then what about content that is to be included in the product rather than promotional and support content? User:cwhii 2-Feb-2009
Suggestions
Gary -- this is some really nice work but there are a couple of things which would make it substantially better:
- Clicking on the images should take me to a nice description of the roles, not to the Image pages themselves.
- Oh man, tell me about it. Wikis are designed for copyright reasons to make this as tough as possible on image content. The wiki needs extra plug-ins or custom hacks to make this work properly. I did get one working case after about 3hrs of testing, but it meant images would be hard linked (so the page would need to be manually updated if any get changed), and generate nasty 3 line URL mouse overs (on my browser at least). Best case I can think of is to convince someone to install the custom Image Map plug-in, which has a fair chance of working without breaking the table alignment. I notice fedora made a separate page on their regular web-site [1] just to get this behaviour. --Garycmartin 21:28, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Say I want to meet some people from role X. How do I do that?
- Thanks, good idea, each team should list its members. Perhaps the semantic wiki plug-in is worth installing for this (Mel backed off asking for it re: test case content/results). Members should at least make a User wiki page for themselves, a little semantic wiki could then auto generate lists for each team where ever needed. --Garycmartin 21:28, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
--Michael Stone 19:18, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Countering systemic bias
I'd like to see a project dedicated to identifying systemic bias in the community, and doing specific things to resolve gaps. +sj + 21:09, 17 May 2009 (UTC)