190
edits
Changes
Talk:Oversight Board/2017-2019-candidates (view source)
Revision as of 20:07, 15 September 2017
, 20:07, 15 September 2017no edit summary
:Another "properly presented" requirement? --[[User:Walter|Walter]] ([[User talk:Walter|talk]]) 20:26, 31 August 2017 (EDT)
:Another "properly presented" requirement? --[[User:Walter|Walter]] ([[User talk:Walter|talk]]) 20:26, 31 August 2017 (EDT)
:Thank you for your clarification. While I appreciate your input, I do think it is appropriate to quote people from whom I have drawn inspiration regarding the development of and sustaining of Sugar, so I will risk leaving my statement as is. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] ([[User talk:Walter|talk]]) 07:19, 7 September 2017 (EDT)
:Thank you for your clarification. While I appreciate your input, I do think it is appropriate to quote people from whom I have drawn inspiration regarding the development of and sustaining of Sugar, so I will risk leaving my statement as is. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] ([[User talk:Walter|talk]]) 07:19, 7 September 2017 (EDT)
As a candidate who read the instructions and wrote within the limit, I think it is disrespectful of other candidates to bypass this requirement, even if you don't agree with it. There are plenty of venues for expression of your opinion, but it is fair to voters to have a summary in one location.
[[User:Sebastian|Sebastian]] ([[User talk:Sebastian|talk]]) 21:07, 15 September 2017 (EDT)