Changes

Taxonomy (view source)

916 bytes removed , 13:38, 24 May 2008

moving initial discussion to discussion page

Line 1: Line 1: −

~~Benjamin M. Schwartz has proposed a taxonomy for the various Sugar components to remedy an ongoing naming problem.~~

−

~~"I think Sugar has a naming problem. There are a lot of different digital~~

−

~~objects being produced by this project, and referring to all of them as~~

−

~~Sugar is becoming increasingly confusing. For example, the discussion~~

−

~~about "Sugar on Windows" has been all but incomprehensible, because each~~

−

~~author means something entirely different by the term "Sugar". Similarly,~~

−

~~the recent proposals for "inclusion in Sugar" are extremely confusing,~~

−

~~since these components will not be required to run Sugar.~~

−

~~"To resolve this, I am going to attempt to list a number of important,~~

−

~~distinct digital objects that this work has produced. I will also~~

−

~~introduce cutesy codenames. I hope that the Sugar developers will adopt a~~

−

~~clear set of distinct names, and I do not care if they choose these names~~

−

~~or other names."~~

−

==Sweet: The abstract design of the interface==

10,579

edits