10,579
edits
Changes
mLine 7:
Line 7: − + − + − + − + − + − + − + − + − +
small bits of wordsmithing
A local Sugar Lab would:
A local Sugar Lab would:
* Adapt the technology and pedagogy to an area's culture and resources (e.g, developing activities and content specific to the region)
* Adapt the technology and pedagogy to an area's culture and resources (e.g, developing activities and content specific to a region)
* Help translate Sugar to the local language(s)
* Help translate Sugar to the local language(s)
* Support sugar deployments in area schools
* Support Sugar deployments in area schools
* Create a local community devoted to the Sugar Labs principles, making Sugar more open and sustainable
* Create a local community devoted to the Sugar Labs principles, making Sugar more open and sustainable
* Provide for communication,between the local communities and the global Sugar Labs community
* Provide for communication,between the local communities and the global Sugar Labs community
* Develop Local contents and software that can be used not only for local purposes but also for the overall community,
* Develop Local content and software that can be used not only for local purposes but also for the overall community
A distributed project—we chose to name Sugar Labs, plural deliberately—where there is a local sense of ownership and associated entrepreneurship feels like the right course for us as an organization. Sugar Labs "central" is the community itself, which would be responsible for setting clear goals and maintaining any necessary infrastructure needed by the project as a whole, while the regional labs would use the own means to make Sugar relevant to their local communities. But what is the "business model" for a successful Sugar Lab? It seems that some necessary conditions for success would be:
A distributed project—we chose to name Sugar Labs, plural deliberately—where there is a local sense of ownership and associated entrepreneurship feels like the right course for us as an organization. Sugar Labs "central" is the community itself, which would be responsible for setting clear goals and maintaining any necessary infrastructure needed by the project as a whole, while the regional labs would use the own means to make Sugar relevant to their local communities. But what is the "business model" for a successful Sugar Lab? It seems that some necessary conditions for success would be:
* A university connection as a local human resource.
* A university connection as a local human resource
* A local pilot user group to learn from
* A local pilot user group from which to learn
* A local passion or sub-goal that provides a rational for the work.
* A local passion or sub-goal that provides a rational for the work
* A two way and straight-forward communication with the overall Sugar Labs community
* Bi-directional communication with the global Sugar community and other Sugar Labs
* Have an sustainable and well defined entrepreneurship model.
* A sustainable and well-defined entrepreneurship model
* Good outreach and publicity relations with local free software communities, companies and industry and even with other sugar labs
* A program to reach out to local free-software community and local industry
What are other considerations? And are these initial "conditions" correct? Your input would be of great value to our efforts. Please join the discussion.
What are other considerations? And are these initial "conditions" correct? Your input would be of great value to our efforts. Please join the discussion.