Changes

699 bytes added ,  17:27, 28 September 2009
→‎Side notes: Trisequel details
Line 120: Line 120:     
*3.) There are "full installs"(real file structure-not a live system) of: Sugar, Sugar+Gnome, Sugar+KDE on larger(4GB+) USB Sticks which are available for download [[http://people.sugarlabs.org/Tgillard/]]in compressed form that can be written to a bootable USB/SD with a dd command in several minutes.
 
*3.) There are "full installs"(real file structure-not a live system) of: Sugar, Sugar+Gnome, Sugar+KDE on larger(4GB+) USB Sticks which are available for download [[http://people.sugarlabs.org/Tgillard/]]in compressed form that can be written to a bootable USB/SD with a dd command in several minutes.
 +
 +
 +
Added Notes:
 +
from Soas lists:
 +
Rubén Rodríguez Pérez
 +
* Trisquel-Edu (Live USB)
 +
* Trisquel-Sugar (Announced 09/28/2009)
 +
 +
I will further explain the differences:
 +
 +
We are including the Sugar packages in both our 2.2 LTS version (where
 +
you can find the Trisquel Edu edition), and in our new 3.0 STS version.
 +
All our live Sugar images will be based on the STS one, as it will
 +
provide better hardware support.
 +
 +
Trisquel Edu, which is a GNOME based educational system, can run Sugar
 +
as an alternate environment, or serve it via LTSP. The Edu edition (like
 +
the Pro one) is only available in the 2.2 LTS version of the distro. It
 +
will be the recommended version for large Sugar-on-Trisquel deployments.
 +
    
Are these also Soas? Or something different and does it matter that much, as long as they are allowing wider distribution and use of SUGAR?
 
Are these also Soas? Or something different and does it matter that much, as long as they are allowing wider distribution and use of SUGAR?
12,355

edits