Changes

Line 27: Line 27:  
* reuse existed ''activity_version'' field as a major part of dotted version and new field for minor part<br><0.88 user will see only ''activity_version'' and >=0.88 ''activity_version''.''new_field'' version<br>in that case we don't break existed versioning line e.g. Browse-104 will be Browse-104(even after adding new version w/ incremented ''new_field'' value) for all sugars(but >=0.88 users will see incremented part)
 
* reuse existed ''activity_version'' field as a major part of dotted version and new field for minor part<br><0.88 user will see only ''activity_version'' and >=0.88 ''activity_version''.''new_field'' version<br>in that case we don't break existed versioning line e.g. Browse-104 will be Browse-104(even after adding new version w/ incremented ''new_field'' value) for all sugars(but >=0.88 users will see incremented part)
   −
* reuse existed ''activity_version'' field as a minor part of dotted version and new field for major part<br><0.88 user will see only ''activity_version'' and >=0.88 ''new_field''.''activity_version'' version<br>also doesn't break versioning line but could confuse >=0.88 users who upgrade theirs sugar to 0.88 and will see Browse-2.104
+
* reuse existed ''activity_version'' field as a minor part of dotted version and new field for major part<br><0.88 user will see only ''activity_version'' and >=0.88 ''new_field''.''activity_version'' version<br>also doesn't break versioning line but could confuse >=0.88 users who upgrade theirs sugar to 0.88 and will see Browse-2.105
    
== Benefit to Sugar ==
 
== Benefit to Sugar ==