10,579
edits
Changes
Oversight Board/2009/Meeting Minutes-2009-12-11 (view source)
Revision as of 11:43, 11 December 2009
, 11:43, 11 December 2009Created page with 'In attendance: SLOB members: walter, tomeu, cjb. SeanDaly, mchua, Canoeberry, bernie Some community members (including alsroot) attended the meeting. == Agenda == # Non-FOSS c…'
In attendance:
SLOB members: walter, tomeu, cjb. SeanDaly, mchua, Canoeberry, bernie
Some community members (including alsroot) attended the meeting.
== Agenda ==
# Non-FOSS content
# SoaS DP
# Trademark policy
=== Non-FOSS content ===
'''MOTION 1:''' adopt http://opensource.org/docs/osd as a set of guidelines for what is permitted on ASLO, for both software and content, and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses's opinions on specific licenses where applicable, and always asking the SFC for advice when a particular license is under question.
Motion passes (6 for; 0 against; 1 abstain)
'''ACTION:''' Walter will inform the community
'''ACTION:''' Alsroot will update ASLO policy pages
=== SoaS DP ===
We praised the work done by the SoaS DP even though they did not submit a final report to the oversight board by its deadline. We discussed Q1 and Q2. (Q3 will be discussed at the next meeting.)
'''MOTION 2:''' Question 1: Yes, SL is and should be a GNU/Linux distributor.
Motion failed (3 for; 3 against; 1 abstain)
'''MOTION 3:''' SL wishes to spread the use of Sugar and consequently works with GNU/Linux distros to produce and offer downloadable versions. This work can include helping to promote distros, and hosting them.
Motion passed (6 for; 0 against; 1 abstain)
'''MOTION 4:''' "Question 2: SL should not be completely neutral about promoting distros, but it should only choose to more strongly promote a distro based on technical merit and maintainer activity, and should publish the criteria it uses for making that decision. Furthermore, SL should be neutral about providing infrastructure resources (hosting, etc) to distros."
Motion passed (4 for; 1 against; 1 abstain; 1 vote yet to be counted)
An amendment to Motion 4 has been proposed and will be discussed at the next meeting.
=== Trademark policy ===
To be continued next time.
== Next meeting ==
Friday, 18 December 2009 15:00 UTC
== Log ==
[[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Log-2009-12-11|Meeting Log]]
[[Category:Oversight board]]
[[Category:Meetings]]
[[Category:Meeting minutes]]
[[Category:Decision panels]]
SLOB members: walter, tomeu, cjb. SeanDaly, mchua, Canoeberry, bernie
Some community members (including alsroot) attended the meeting.
== Agenda ==
# Non-FOSS content
# SoaS DP
# Trademark policy
=== Non-FOSS content ===
'''MOTION 1:''' adopt http://opensource.org/docs/osd as a set of guidelines for what is permitted on ASLO, for both software and content, and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses's opinions on specific licenses where applicable, and always asking the SFC for advice when a particular license is under question.
Motion passes (6 for; 0 against; 1 abstain)
'''ACTION:''' Walter will inform the community
'''ACTION:''' Alsroot will update ASLO policy pages
=== SoaS DP ===
We praised the work done by the SoaS DP even though they did not submit a final report to the oversight board by its deadline. We discussed Q1 and Q2. (Q3 will be discussed at the next meeting.)
'''MOTION 2:''' Question 1: Yes, SL is and should be a GNU/Linux distributor.
Motion failed (3 for; 3 against; 1 abstain)
'''MOTION 3:''' SL wishes to spread the use of Sugar and consequently works with GNU/Linux distros to produce and offer downloadable versions. This work can include helping to promote distros, and hosting them.
Motion passed (6 for; 0 against; 1 abstain)
'''MOTION 4:''' "Question 2: SL should not be completely neutral about promoting distros, but it should only choose to more strongly promote a distro based on technical merit and maintainer activity, and should publish the criteria it uses for making that decision. Furthermore, SL should be neutral about providing infrastructure resources (hosting, etc) to distros."
Motion passed (4 for; 1 against; 1 abstain; 1 vote yet to be counted)
An amendment to Motion 4 has been proposed and will be discussed at the next meeting.
=== Trademark policy ===
To be continued next time.
== Next meeting ==
Friday, 18 December 2009 15:00 UTC
== Log ==
[[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Log-2009-12-11|Meeting Log]]
[[Category:Oversight board]]
[[Category:Meetings]]
[[Category:Meeting minutes]]
[[Category:Decision panels]]