10,579
edits
Changes
Oversight Board/2009/Meeting Minutes-2009-12-18 (view source)
Revision as of 12:32, 18 December 2009
, 12:32, 18 December 2009Created page with 'In attendance: SLOB members: walter, tomeu, cjb. SeanDaly, mchua, Canoeberry, bernie Some community members (including satellit, sdziallas, karenesq) attended the meeting. == …'
In attendance:
SLOB members: walter, tomeu, cjb. SeanDaly, mchua, Canoeberry, bernie
Some community members (including satellit, sdziallas, karenesq) attended the meeting.
== Agenda ==
# Revisit Motion 4 from last week
# Resolve outstanding Sugar on a Stick decision (Q3)
# Further discussion of policy for using Sugar trademark
# Guidelines re transactions with the SFC
# Infrastructure proposal
=== Revisit Motion 4 from last week ===
[[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-12-11#SoaS_DP|Motion 4 from last week]] in regard to [[Decision_panels/SOAS#Q2:_distro_endorsement_v._neutrality|Q2: distro endorsement v. neutrality]]
As discussed in [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-December/009553.html email] after last week's meeting:
'''MOTION 1:''' Q2: Sugar Labs encourages all GNU/Linux distributions to package and distribute Sugar, and if possible will assist with hosting and infrastructure. SL Marketing may strategically decide to focus resources towards specific distributions in the interest of promoting Sugar more effectively.
Motion passes (7 for; 0 against)
=== Resolve outstanding Sugar on a Stick decision (Q3) ===
[[Decision_panels/SOAS#Q3:_SoaS_name|SoaS DP Q3: SoaS name]]
'''MOTION 2:''' Yes, "Sugar on a Stick" should be reserved by Sugar Labs for use
by the SoaS-Fedora distribution so that Sugar can be marketed
effectively, until such time when a trademark policy, agreement, and
process is put in place: SoaS will be the first project to go through
that process.
Being voted on in [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-December/009630.html email]
=== Further discussion of policy for using Sugar trademark ===
Lots of good discussion and we are close to some motions. To be continued.
=== Guidelines re transactions with the SFC ===
Walter pointed to [[]] but we did not discuss the guidelines. To be continued.
=== Infrastructure proposal ===
We did not discuss Bernie's infrastructure proposal.
== Next meeting ==
Wednesday, 23 December 2009 15:00 UTC
== Log ==
[[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Log-2009-12-18|Meeting Log]]
[[Category:Oversight board]]
[[Category:Meetings]]
[[Category:Meeting minutes]]
[[Category:Decision panels]]
SLOB members: walter, tomeu, cjb. SeanDaly, mchua, Canoeberry, bernie
Some community members (including satellit, sdziallas, karenesq) attended the meeting.
== Agenda ==
# Revisit Motion 4 from last week
# Resolve outstanding Sugar on a Stick decision (Q3)
# Further discussion of policy for using Sugar trademark
# Guidelines re transactions with the SFC
# Infrastructure proposal
=== Revisit Motion 4 from last week ===
[[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-12-11#SoaS_DP|Motion 4 from last week]] in regard to [[Decision_panels/SOAS#Q2:_distro_endorsement_v._neutrality|Q2: distro endorsement v. neutrality]]
As discussed in [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-December/009553.html email] after last week's meeting:
'''MOTION 1:''' Q2: Sugar Labs encourages all GNU/Linux distributions to package and distribute Sugar, and if possible will assist with hosting and infrastructure. SL Marketing may strategically decide to focus resources towards specific distributions in the interest of promoting Sugar more effectively.
Motion passes (7 for; 0 against)
=== Resolve outstanding Sugar on a Stick decision (Q3) ===
[[Decision_panels/SOAS#Q3:_SoaS_name|SoaS DP Q3: SoaS name]]
'''MOTION 2:''' Yes, "Sugar on a Stick" should be reserved by Sugar Labs for use
by the SoaS-Fedora distribution so that Sugar can be marketed
effectively, until such time when a trademark policy, agreement, and
process is put in place: SoaS will be the first project to go through
that process.
Being voted on in [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-December/009630.html email]
=== Further discussion of policy for using Sugar trademark ===
Lots of good discussion and we are close to some motions. To be continued.
=== Guidelines re transactions with the SFC ===
Walter pointed to [[]] but we did not discuss the guidelines. To be continued.
=== Infrastructure proposal ===
We did not discuss Bernie's infrastructure proposal.
== Next meeting ==
Wednesday, 23 December 2009 15:00 UTC
== Log ==
[[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Log-2009-12-18|Meeting Log]]
[[Category:Oversight board]]
[[Category:Meetings]]
[[Category:Meeting minutes]]
[[Category:Decision panels]]