Changes

106 bytes added ,  21:49, 12 January 2010
History request
Line 2: Line 2:     
This is a discussion on the name "Sugar" and potential alternatives. There are currently no active initiatives to rebrand. Note that re-branding would be a very difficult, costly, and extended process - however, if you believe it to be worthwhile, go for it and start mapping out and proposing a gameplan on how and why to do so. Please add to the discussion on this page if you have ideas/are interested.
 
This is a discussion on the name "Sugar" and potential alternatives. There are currently no active initiatives to rebrand. Note that re-branding would be a very difficult, costly, and extended process - however, if you believe it to be worthwhile, go for it and start mapping out and proposing a gameplan on how and why to do so. Please add to the discussion on this page if you have ideas/are interested.
 +
 +
== History ==
 +
 +
Please explain here how the name "Sugar" emerged and how the decision to use it was made.
    
== Downsides to current name ==
 
== Downsides to current name ==
37

edits