Changes

m
no edit summary
Line 49: Line 49:  
Yes—provided it is clear which is our software and which is by others.
 
Yes—provided it is clear which is our software and which is by others.
   −
(Sean) This can't be Sugar on a Stick, but it is a fine candidate for the labelling program.
+
(Sean) This can't be Sugar on a Stick, but it is a fine candidate for the labeling program.
    
==== What should the policy be? ====
 
==== What should the policy be? ====
 
You can call it Sugar if it is Sugar but you you must not put our name on stuff we didn't make.
 
You can call it Sugar if it is Sugar but you you must not put our name on stuff we didn't make.
   −
(Sean) The above is ambiguous, unfortunately. However, the labelling program should cover this case.
+
(Sean) The above is ambiguous, unfortunately. However, the labeling program should cover this case.
    
=== Sugar on a Stick with modified stuff ===
 
=== Sugar on a Stick with modified stuff ===
Line 64: Line 64:  
No. It isn't our version of the software.
 
No. It isn't our version of the software.
   −
(Sean) This can't be Sugar on a Stick, but could be a candidate for the labelling program.
+
(Sean) This can't be Sugar on a Stick, but could be a candidate for the labeling program.
    
==== What should the policy be? ====
 
==== What should the policy be? ====
Line 99: Line 99:  
More stuff goes here.
 
More stuff goes here.
   −
(Sean) complain to our MEPs that Eastern European beet sugar roundtrips through the Netherlands by truck to win EU subsidies, adding to pollution too.
+
(Sean) complain to our MEPs that Eastern European beet sugar round trips through the Netherlands by truck to win EU subsidies, adding to pollution too.
    
=== Look and Feel ===
 
=== Look and Feel ===
Line 124: Line 124:  
==== What should the policy be? ====
 
==== What should the policy be? ====
   −
(Sean) This is a perfect candidate for the labelling program, once the name problem is sorted out. We wish to encourage this case!
+
(Sean) This is a perfect candidate for the labeling program, once the name problem is sorted out. We wish to encourage this case!
 
      
=== Intel Classmate partner OEM ===
 
=== Intel Classmate partner OEM ===
Line 137: Line 136:  
==== What should the policy be? ====
 
==== What should the policy be? ====
   −
(Sean) A perfect candidate for the labelling program.
+
(Sean) A perfect candidate for the labeling program.
 
      
=== Sugar on a bootable USB stick as part of a Educational Suite ===
 
=== Sugar on a bootable USB stick as part of a Educational Suite ===
Line 155: Line 153:     
Can they use "SugarLabs" in label?
 
Can they use "SugarLabs" in label?
      
examples: openSUSE-Edu-li-f-e or Fedora-12-i686-Live-Edu  
 
examples: openSUSE-Edu-li-f-e or Fedora-12-i686-Live-Edu