Changes

Line 8: Line 8:  
* ''license'' activity.info field value has short names that conform fedora good licences lists: [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses software], [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses_2 documentation] and [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses_3 content].
 
* ''license'' activity.info field value has short names that conform fedora good licences lists: [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses software], [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses_2 documentation] and [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses_3 content].
   −
== Additional technical policy for editors ==
+
== Technical policy ==
    
* Check that activity runs on declared Sugar Platforms.<br>Major sugar environments are [[Development Team/Packaging]]
 
* Check that activity runs on declared Sugar Platforms.<br>Major sugar environments are [[Development Team/Packaging]]
Line 15: Line 15:  
** x86_64 architecture (looks like we have x86_64 only for SP-0.84+)
 
** x86_64 architecture (looks like we have x86_64 only for SP-0.84+)
 
* If activity entirely(not just minor glitches like screen resolution) depends on hardware/software properties of particular environment(XO for example), this activity can not be pushed to the public and should be left in [[Glossary#Experimental_activity|Experimental]] stage. In that case editors could collect these activities in collections e.g. "Experimental XO activities" until they are fixed to run in common environment which satisfy Sugar Platform specification.
 
* If activity entirely(not just minor glitches like screen resolution) depends on hardware/software properties of particular environment(XO for example), this activity can not be pushed to the public and should be left in [[Glossary#Experimental_activity|Experimental]] stage. In that case editors could collect these activities in collections e.g. "Experimental XO activities" until they are fixed to run in common environment which satisfy Sugar Platform specification.
 +
* Check it there is a component for activity on bugs.sugarlabs.org, if not, ask uploader about maintainer and create(request for creation) one
 
* For all bugs that were found during review
 
* For all bugs that were found during review
 
** create tickets on http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ for component ActivityTeam
 
** create tickets on http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ for component ActivityTeam