Changes

How [[Activity Team/Zero Sugar|Zero Sugar]] could be useful on examples.

How [[Activity Team/Zero Sugar|Zero Sugar]] could be useful on examples.

== What activity instance to prefer, natively packaged or directly from developer? ==

== Natively packaged or directly from developer activities? ==

Zero Sugar could help with optimizing developer-to-distributor-to-user model. For example:

Zero Sugar could help with optimizing developer-to-distributor-to-user model. For example:

* developer lets 0sugar create packages for major GNU/Linux distribution on OBS

* developer lets 0sugar create packages for major GNU/Linux distribution on OBS

* distributors, either using native OBS features (like links and branches) create their own compilations of activities on OBS or just attach/copy OBS packages, compose repositories with activities for end users

* distributors, either using native OBS features (like links and branches) create their own compilations of activities on OBS or just attach/copy OBS packages, compose repositories with activities for end users

* on end users side, sugar will understand that there are packaged and direct activity instances, user by setting policy can prefer only packaged versions

* on end users side, sugar will understand that there are packaged and direct activity instances

* user(or distributor), by setting policy, can prefer only packaged versions