Changes

Ready for feedback!
Line 1: Line 1: −
{{Under construction|This page may be incomprehensible for 48 hours. --[[User:Inkyfingers|Inkyfingers]] 15:51, 19 December 2011 (EST)}}
+
{{Under construction|Ready for feedback!.--[[User:Inkyfingers|Inkyfingers]] 02:35, 20 December 2011 (EST)}}
   −
Mint-12 successful install notes here: [[Talk:Platform Team/Guide/Sugar via Sweets#Installing Sugar via sweets - in Mint-12]]
+
==Mint-12 successful install==
==try this==
+
notes here: [[Talk:Platform Team/Guide/Sugar via Sweets#Installing Sugar via sweets - in Mint-12]]
 +
===try this===
 
:http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Community/Distributions/Sweets_Distribution
 
:http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Community/Distributions/Sweets_Distribution
 
:works fine for 11.04 Linux Mint 11  I did this and it worked but alsroot wanted me to not put it on the wiki. It installs sweets-sugar 0.94.1 [[User:Satellit]] 9 Dec 2011
 
:works fine for 11.04 Linux Mint 11  I did this and it worked but alsroot wanted me to not put it on the wiki. It installs sweets-sugar 0.94.1 [[User:Satellit]] 9 Dec 2011
 
== Exploring extra documentation ==
 
== Exploring extra documentation ==
I propose to paste below: [[Platform_Team/Guide/Sweets_Usage]]] ...
+
Expanding central section of [[Platform_Team/Guide/Sweets_Usage]]] ...
   −
Then I cut the introduction and first paragraph.
   
=== Aim of this paper ===
 
=== Aim of this paper ===
 
'''What are the opportunities of improving documentation for users at a certain point, after install and before successful launch?'''
 
'''What are the opportunities of improving documentation for users at a certain point, after install and before successful launch?'''
Line 26: Line 26:  
''Alternatively, {{Code|sweets}} might be run from the [[Platform_Team/Guide/Sweets_Packaging#Run_Sweets_from_sources|sources]].''
 
''Alternatively, {{Code|sweets}} might be run from the [[Platform_Team/Guide/Sweets_Packaging#Run_Sweets_from_sources|sources]].''
   −
:Issue 2. This idea needs dealing with at an appropriate level. Is this an alternative for our reader? Under what conditions would the reader start on this method? Or is it a "more advanced method"?
+
:Issue 2. This idea needs dealing with at an appropriate level. Is this an alternative for our reader? Under what conditions would the reader start on this method?
 
=== Upgrade ===
 
=== Upgrade ===
  
687

edits