Changes

no edit summary
Line 170: Line 170:  
but that is a private member. Then we need to look if we add a method to set the it,  
 
but that is a private member. Then we need to look if we add a method to set the it,  
 
or change the api to make the first container (where is the menu today) useful for other type of widgets.
 
or change the api to make the first container (where is the menu today) useful for other type of widgets.
  −
=== Can't call gdk_window_set_user_data() ===
  −
  −
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/python-hackers-list/2011-September/msg00006.html
      
=== A handful of NMClient issues ===
 
=== A handful of NMClient issues ===
    
See http://mail.gnome.org/archives/python-hackers-list/2011-August/msg00003.html and the other posts in the thread. Some problems resolved, some probably still pending.
 
See http://mail.gnome.org/archives/python-hackers-list/2011-August/msg00003.html and the other posts in the thread. Some problems resolved, some probably still pending.
 +
    
==Done==
 
==Done==
 +
 +
=== Can't call gdk_window_set_user_data() ===
 +
In the latest implementation we don't use set_user_data anymore AFAIK.
 +
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/python-hackers-list/2011-September/msg00006.html
 +
    
=== do_forall not working in pygobject ===
 
=== do_forall not working in pygobject ===
3,267

edits